CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 260Big Data and Business IntelligenceInformation Technology Governance and StrategyInnovation and Knowledge Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of information governance in big data analytics driven innovation

Open access
Mikalef, Patrick, Boura, Maria, Lekakos, George, Krogstie, John·2020·Information & Management
DOI 10.1016/j.im.2020.103361
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The age of big data analytics is now here, with companies increasingly investing in big data initiatives to foster innovation and outperform competition. Nevertheless, while researchers and practitioners started to examine the shifts that these technologies entail and their overall business value, it is still unclear whether and under what conditions they drive innovation. To address this gap, this study draws on the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm and information governance theory to explore the interplay between a firm’s big data analytics capabilities (BDACs) and their information governance practices in shaping innovation capabilities. We argue that a firm’s BDAC helps enhance two distinct types of innovative capabilities, incremental and radical capabilities, and that information governance positively moderates this relationship. To examine our research model, we analyzed survey data collected from 175 IT and business managers. Results from partial least squares structural equation modelling analysis reveal that BDACs have a positive and significant effect on both incremental and radical innovative capabilities. Our analysis also highlights the important role of information governance, as it positively moderates the relationship between BDAC’s and a firm’s radical innovative capability, while there is a nonsignificant moderating effect for incremental innovation capabilities. Finally, we examine the effect of environmental uncertainty conditions in our model and find that information governance and BDACs have amplified effects under conditions of high environmental dynamism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.im.2020.103361

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 1 Conceptual research model with hypothesized relationships.
Fig. 1 Conceptual research model with hypothesized relationships.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Estimated causal relationships of structural model.
Fig. 2 Estimated causal relationships of structural model.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 106 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kiron, 2017, Lessons from becoming a data-driven organization, MIT sloan management rev., 58
  2. Mikalef, 2017, Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda, Inf. Syst. E-business Manag., 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
Corresponding author
Mikalef, Patrick
ORCID
Venue
Information & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
57
Issue
7
Pages
103361
ISSN
0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.im.2020.103361
OpenAlex
W3049164745
Cited by
260
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 2
FWCI
32.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Information & Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Athens University of Economics and Business
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
information governance, big data analytics capability, innovation ability, incremental innovation, radical innovation, resource-based view, environmental uncertainty, environmental dynamism, moderating effect, big data analytics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review