Cited by 1,090Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchImmune Response and InflammationT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Toll-like Receptor 7 and TLR9 Dictate Autoantibody Specificity and Have Opposing Inflammatory and Regulatory Roles in a Murine Model of Lupus

Open access
Christensen, Sean R., Shupe, Jonathan, Nickerson, Kevin, Kashgarian, Michael, Flavell, Richard A., Shlomchik, Mark J.·2006·Immunity

Abstract

Antibodies (Abs) to RNA- and DNA-containing autoantigens are characteristic of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We showed previously that Toll-like receptor (TLR) 9, recognizing DNA, is required for the spontaneous generation of DNA autoantibodies, but not for the development of lupus nephritis in susceptible mice. We report that lupus-prone mice deficient in TLR7, a receptor for ssRNA, failed to generate Abs to RNA-containing antigens (Ags) such as Smith (Sm) Ag. TLR9 and TLR7 also had dramatic effects on clinical disease in lupus-prone mice. In the absence of TLR9, autoimmune disease was exacerbated, lymphocytes and plasmacytoid DCs were more activated, and serum IgG and IFN-alpha were increased. In contrast, TLR7-deficient mice had ameliorated disease, decreased lymphocyte activation, and decreased serum IgG. These findings reveal opposing inflammatory and regulatory roles for TLR7 and TLR9, despite similar tissue expression and signaling pathways. These results have important implications for TLR-directed therapy of autoimmune disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.07.013

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christensen, S. R., Shupe, J., Nickerson, K., Kashgarian, M., Flavell, R. A., & Shlomchik, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Shlomchik, Mark J.
Venue
Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
417-428
ISSN
1074-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134106169
Cited by
1,090
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 58
FWCI
44.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM07205, T32GM007205)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P01AI036529)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P01AR050256)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
TLR7, TLR9, systemic lupus erythematosus, autoantibody specificity, lupus-prone mice, lupus nephritis, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, lymphocyte activation, interferon-alpha, serum IgG, autoimmunity regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibody Specificity, Autoantibodies, Cells, Cultured, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Lymphocyte Activation, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Knockout, Mice, Inbred MRL lpr, Toll-Like Receptor 7, Toll-Like Receptor 9, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review