The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Two studies showed some effects in the opposite direction, that is, that sex differences are larger in countries with higher living conditions (Stoet & Geary, 2013, 2015).”
From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Stoet & Geary, 2015
Citations
Cites
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression
Cook, R. D. (1977) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1977.10489493 · Cited by 3,418
Emergence and Characterization of Sex Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-Analysis
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130467 · Cited by 3,234
The gender similarities hypothesis.
Hyde, J. S. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.6.581 · Cited by 3,084
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250 · Cited by 2,868
Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression
Cook, R. D. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271434 · Cited by 2,277
Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities
Halpern, D. F. (2000) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410605290 · Cited by 1,989
Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018053 · Cited by 1,630
Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis.
Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53 · Cited by 1,405
Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta-analysis.
Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0036620 · Cited by 1,337
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Jacobs, 2005, Leaks in the pipeline to math, science, and technology careers, volume 110 of New directions for child and adolescent development, chapter Mapping Leaks in the Math, 3
- Müller, 2006, Equality under the sharia?, Internationale Politik [International Politics], 61, 124
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617741719 · Cited by 1,054
“…and these educational gaps (e.g., as demonstrated by Else-Quest, Hyde, & Linn, 2010; Guiso, Monte, Sapienza, & Zingales, 2008; Hyde & Mertz, 2009; Reilly, 2012) can be difficult to determine and is not always found (Ellison & Swanson, 2010; for an in-depth discussion, see Stoet & Geary, 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSex Differences in Spatial Cognition: Advancing the Conversation
Levine, S. C., Foley, A., Lourenco, S., Ehrlich, S., & Ratliff, K. (2016) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1380 · Cited by 209
Canetto, S. S., & Chen, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.042 · Cited by 194
Stoet, G., Bailey, D. H., Moore, A. M., & Geary, D. C. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153857 · Cited by 188
Self-citationExplaining the sex difference in dyslexia
Arnett, A. B., Pennington, B. F., Peterson, R. L., Willcutt, E. G., DeFries, J. C., & Olson, R. K. (2017) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12691 · Cited by 162
“In addition, the sex difference in reading skill is found across countries with widely differing educational practices (Stoet & Geary, 2013, 2015) and across languages whose orthographies vary in transparency.”
InfluentialWierenga, L. M., Sexton, J. A., Laake, P., Giedd, J. N., Tamnes, C. K., & the Pediatric Imaging, N. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx154 · Cited by 152
Victora, C. G., Hartwig, F. P., Vidaletti, L. P., Martorell, R., Osmond, C., Richter, L., Stein, A. D., Barros, A. J. D., Adair, L. S., Barros, F. C., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02716-1 · Cited by 118
A graphically based machine learning approach to predict secondary schools performance in Tunisia
Rebai, S., Yahia, F. B., & Essid, H. (2019) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.seps.2019.06.009 · Cited by 114
Factors predicting mathematics achievement in PISA: a systematic review
Wang, X. S., Perry, L. B., Malpique, A., & Ide, T. (2023) · Large-scale Assessments in Education · doi:10.1186/s40536-023-00174-8 · Cited by 165
“Six large crossnational studies found mixed results that varied by level of national level of economic development (Anghel et al., 2020), as well as PISA cycle (Eriksson et al., 2020), measure of gender equality (Reilly, 2012), or both (Stoet & Geary, 2013, 2015; Tao & Michalopoulos, 2018).”
BackgroundKing, R. B. (2016) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.006 · Cited by 122
Pitsia, V., Biggart, A., & Karakolidis, A. (2017) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.014 · Cited by 123
“Moreover, a very recent study examining all PISA cycles from 2000 to 2009 indicated that girls outperformed boys in overall performance, including mathematics (Stoet & Geary, 2015).”
BackgroundResultWebb-Williams, J. (2018) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9592-0 · Cited by 94
Torres, L. H., Mohand, M. A.-L., & Mohamed, L. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03075 · Cited by 145
Intellectual Precocity: What Have We Learned Since Terman?
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2020) · Gifted Child Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0016986220925447 · Cited by 106
“…in mathematical versus verbal reasoning reviewed earlier have been shown to reflect robust cross-cultural educational and occupational outcomes as a function of mathematical versus verbal ability strengths (Stoet & Geary, 2015, 2018), which also mirror those previously reported (Figures 3 and 4).”
ResultTorppa, M., Vasalampi, K., Eklund, K., Sulkunen, S., & Niemi, P. (2019) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1670334 · Cited by 120
‘Being good isn’t good enough’: gender discrimination in Italian academia
Filandri, M., & Pasqua, S. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1693990 · Cited by 86
“…gender gap in education has disappeared in advanced economies over the last few decades and women are often even more highly educated and obtain better academic results than men, they are still underrepresented in all countries’ universities and research centres (OECD, 2012; Stoet and Geary, 2015).”
Torppa, M., Eklund, K., Sulkunen, S., Niemi, P., & Ahonen, T. P. S. (2017) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12103 · Cited by 102
“…for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA; Elley, 1992), the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS; e.g., Mullis, Martin, Foy, & Drucker, 2012; Mullis, Martin, Kennedy, & Foy, 2007), and the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA; Stoet & Geary, 2013, 2015).”
BackgroundSex differences in adolescents’ occupational aspirations: Variations across time and place
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261438 · Cited by 89
“This means that the more developed and gender-equal countries are a long way from closing the much-discussed gender gap in STEM and in many other relatively segregated occupations [51].”
BackgroundSelf-citationUsing assessment to individualize early mathematics instruction
Connor, C. M., Mazzocco, M. M. M., Kurz, T., Crowe, E. C., Tighe, E. L., Wood, T. S., & Morrison, F. J. (2017) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.005 · Cited by 68
Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students.
McCabe, K. O., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000239 · Cited by 72
“…are much more “tilted” (i.e., higher mathematical ability relative to verbal ability), whereas females are more balanced (Humphreys et al., 1993; Stoet & Geary, 2015, 2018).1 There are also approximately one standard deviation differences in three-dimensional spatial visualization (Hedges &…”
Tarbetsky, A. L., Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2016) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.01.002 · Cited by 77
Societal inequalities amplify gender gaps in math
Breda, T., Jouini, E., & Napp, C. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar2307 · Cited by 71
A simplified approach to measuring national gender inequality
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205349 · Cited by 64
Self-citationXiao, Y., Liu, Y., & Hu, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01646 · Cited by 71
Salikutluk, Z., & Heyne, S. (2017) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcx049 · Cited by 67
Heyder, A., van Hek, M., & Houtte, M. V. (2020) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01147-9 · Cited by 72
A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox
Herlitz, A., Hönig, I., Hedebrant, K., & Asperholm, M. (2025) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231202685 · Cited by 59
“…Bonsang et al., 2017; Dickerson et al., 2015; Else-Quest et al., 2010; Lauer et al., 2019; Lippa et al., 2010; Marks, 2008; Silverman et al., 2007; Stoet & Geary, 2013, 2015, 2018; Tao & Michalopoulos, 2018; van Hek et al., 2019; Weber et al., 2014) and six in the new analyses (R. A. Block et…”
InfluentialThe Relation Between Gender Egalitarian Values and Gender Differences in Academic Achievement
Eriksson, K., Björnstjerna, M., & Vartanova, I. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00236 · Cited by 69
Fielding, S., Tiffin, P. A., Greatrix, R., Lee, A. J., Patterson, F., Nicholson, S., & Cleland, J. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023274 · Cited by 53
“38 43–45 Finally, we also looked at male gender as females surpass males in high school examination performance in many countries including the UK.(46) 47 Whether related to this or not (the pattern of performance is different at the extremes),(48) in the UK, the proportion of male medical students is significantly lo…”
Students’ test motivation in PISA: the case of Norway
Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Kjærnsli, M. (2016) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1080/09585176.2016.1156004 · Cited by 40
“Stoet and Geary (2014) demonstrated in their study of three PISA cycles that for overall achievement across reading, mathematics, and science literacy, girls outperformed boys in 70% of participating countries.”
BackgroundThings versus People: Gender Differences in Vocational Interests and in Occupational Preferences
Kühn, A., & Wolter, S. C. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.09.003 · Cited by 55
A Cultural Psychological Model of Cross-National Variation in Gender Gaps in STEM Participation
Yalçınkaya, N. S., & Adams, G. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868320947005 · Cited by 53
“Stoet and Geary (2015) concluded that the relationship between gender equality and the gender gap in math performance was not robust, as it did not emerge in the four exams that they examined other than the PISA 2003.”
BackgroundCasey, B. M., & Ganley, C. M. (2021) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2021.100963 · Cited by 65
Dekhtyar, S., Weber, D., Helgertz, J., & Herlitz, A. (2018) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2017.11.007 · Cited by 98
“…these cognitive sex differences are often modest in magnitude (Hyde, 2016), they have been consistently reported throughout the lifespan and across geographical regions (Else-Quest, Hyde, & Linn, 2010; Lippa, Collaer, & Peters, 2010; Stoet & Geary, 2013; Stoet & Geary, 2015; Weber et al., 2014).”
Balducci, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105234 · Cited by 56
“Additionally, the results are sensitive to the inclusion of Scandinavian and gender-segregated, Muslim countries as well as gender-equal nations in which boys considerably underperform girls (Fryer and Levitt, 2010; Kane and Mertz, 2012; Stoet and Geary, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialKolomeichuk, S. N., Randler, C., Shabalina, I., Fradkova, L., & Borisenkov, M. F. (2016) · Biological Rhythm Research · doi:10.1080/09291016.2016.1207352 · Cited by 48
Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., & Hu, X. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09872-3 · Cited by 50
“However, this pattern disappears when using other cycles of PISA data (e.g., Stoet & Geary, 2015, 2018; Stoet et al., 2016).”
Huang, F., Peng, D., & Teo, T. P. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70041 · Cited by 45
Yu, J., & McLellan, R. (2018) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.010 · Cited by 49
Giofrè, D., Cornoldi, C., Martini, Á., & Toffalini, E. (2020) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101467 · Cited by 49
“Recent evidence also has shown that there are more males than females with relative advantages in mathematics (i.e., their math achievement larger than their reading achievement), which results in a bias toward STEM fields (Stoet & Geary, 2015, 2018).”
BackgroundUnderstanding the gender gap in school performance among low-income children
Kingdon, D., Serbin, L. A., & Stack, D. M. (2016) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/0165025416631836 · Cited by 45
“Although large-scale, international studies have documented consistent differences in the academic performance of males and females (Stoet & Geary, 2013, 2015; Voyer & Voyer, 2014), little is known about the factors that produce these differences, especially among low-income samples who have the…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMultilevel Models of the Relationship Between Music Achievement and Reading and Math Achievement
Bergee, M. J., & Weingarten, K. M. (2020) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/0022429420941432 · Cited by 35
“The sex of participants has received a great deal of attention, although differences are not always found (Jackson, 2012) and sometimes are confounded with other variables and with outliers (Long et al., 2007; Stoet & Geary, 2015).”
BackgroundSingle-mother families and the gender gap in children’s time investment and non-cognitive skills
Mencarini, L., Pasqua, S., & Romiti, A. (2017) · Review of Economics of the Household · doi:10.1007/s11150-017-9385-x · Cited by 33
“…PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) study, boys obtain worse test scores than girls in 70 percent of the 74 countries evaluated (Stoet and Geary, 2015), although there are some differences in the results among the three fields (reading, mathematics and science) included in the…”
ResultTrajectories of insecurity: Young adults' employment entry, health and well-being
Klug, K., Drobnič, S., & Brockmann, H. (2019) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2019.05.005 · Cited by 28
Educational policies and the gender gap in test scores: a cross-country analysis
Hermann, Z., & Kopasz, M. (2019) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2019.1678065 · Cited by 42
“Early tracking and standardisation are key themes in this literature (Van de Werfhorst 2015; Hanushek and Woessmann 2010).”
BackgroundGender Gap Among High Achievers in Math and Implications for STEM Pipeline
Zhou, Y., Fan, X., Wei, X., & Tai, R. H. (2017) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-017-0346-1 · Cited by 36
Anwar, S., Salsabila, I., Sofyan, R., & Amna, Z. (2019) · Jurnal Psikologi · doi:10.14710/jp.18.2.281-296 · Cited by 49
Gender gap and access to finance: A cross‐country analysis
Chundakkadan, R., & Sasidharan, S. (2021) · Review of Development Economics · doi:10.1111/rode.12830 · Cited by 31
Dutta, D. (2017) · Journal of Family Communication · doi:10.1080/15267431.2017.1363045 · Cited by 30
“This line of research suggests that lack of interest rather than cognitive ability is a factor to consider, which potentially keeps young women from pursuing engineering careers (Stoet & Geary, 2015; Valla & Ceci, 2014).”
BackgroundIntersectional effects of Socioeconomic status, phase and gender on Mathematics achievement
Cascella, C. (2019) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2019.1614432 · Cited by 37
“Nevertheless, more recent studies have disclosed small and narrowing relationships between gender bias and female disadvantages in mathematics (Ireson 2017; Stoet and Geary 2015, 2018), thus calling for more investigations.”
BackgroundBorgonovi, F., & Greiff, S. (2020) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.101422 · Cited by 32
Sex Differences in Episodic Memory Variance
Asperholm, M., van Leuven, L., & Herlitz, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00613 · Cited by 27
How outdoor science education can help girls stay engaged with science
Stevenson, K. T., Szczytko, R., Carrier, S., & Peterson, M. N. (2021) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2021.1900948 · Cited by 38
“While it is encouraging that gender gaps seem to be shrinking in areas such as academic achievement among girls (Stoet & Geary, 2015), these trends do not hold among girls of colour (Collins et al., 2020), and because gaps persist, so should initiatives to mitigate them (Beede et al., 2011).”
BackgroundModelling Adult Skills in OECD Countries
Scandurra, R., & Calero, J. (2016) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3290 · Cited by 27
“The evidence, however, is mixed and these differences are inversely correlated across the four waves of PISA between and within countries (Stoet & Geary 2015).”
Sex-specific academic ability and attitude patterns in students across developed countries
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2020) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101453 · Cited by 27
“The sex differences in academic abilities and attitudes are not only of theoretical interest, but also of a sociopolitical concern because they influence the occupational and educational choices of women and men (Stoet & Geary, 2015).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationHoffmann, M. S., McDaid, D., Salum, G. A., Ribeiro, W. S., Ziebold, C., King, D., Gadelha, A., Miguel, E. C., Mari, J. D. J., Rohde, L. A., et al. (2021) · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · doi:10.1017/s2045796021000561 · Cited by 28
“…attainment and achievement rates (Voyer and Voyer, 2014; Lavoie et al., 2019) and higher rates of externalising conditions compared to females (Stoet and Geary, 2015), whereas females have higher rates of distress-related conditions (such as major depression) and are more likely to be…”
BackgroundGeneral or specific abilities? Evidence from 33 countries participating in the PISA assessments
Pokropek, A., Marks, G. N., Borgonovi, F., Koc, P., & Greiff, S. (2022) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2022.101653 · Cited by 31
Cascella, C., Williams, J. S., & Pampaka, M. (2021) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-021-02764-x · Cited by 22
Oberleiter, S., Fries, J., Schock, L. S., Steininger, B., & Pietschnig, J. (2023) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2023.101784 · Cited by 33
The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women
Cheung, F. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716 · Cited by 24
Hetlevik, Ø., Bøe, T., & Hysing, M. (2018) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/cky026 · Cited by 20
Gender matters when sports engagement and self-efficacy interact with academic achievement
Shoval, E., Shachaf, M., Dvir, O. R., & Shulruf, B. (2020) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-020-09598-4 · Cited by 19
Composing Meaningful Lives: Exceptional Women and Men at Age 50
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., McCabe, K. O., & Bernstein, B. O. (2023) · Gifted Child Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00169862231175831 · Cited by 20
Bedyńska, S., Krejtz, I., Rycielski, P., & Sędek, G. (2020) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-020-09557-z · Cited by 20
“Additionally, as language skills are highly correlated with mathematics and science, they show their relevance for success in STEM domains (Stoet and Geary 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-perceived competence and social acceptance of young children who stutter: Initial findings
Rodgers, N. H., & Zebrowski, P. M. (2016) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.08.004 · Cited by 18
“This gender gap in academic achievement continues into the school years and adulthood, with a female advantage for reading and writing (Scheiber, Reynolds, Hajovsky, & Kaufman, 2015; Stoet & Geary, 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-Reported Academic Performance and Lifestyle Habits of School Children in Japan
Kohyama, J. (2017) · International Journal of Child Health and Nutrition · doi:10.6000/1929-4247.2017.06.03.1 · Cited by 17
“Recently, based on the Programme for International Student Assessment conducted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Stoet and Geary [22] concluded that girls’ overall achievement (across mathematics, reading, and science) exceeds that of boys’.”
MethodGENDER PAY GAPS IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION: A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE
Khitarishvili, T. (2019) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12321 · Cited by 17
“8 Out of the former Soviet countries in this analysis, Weichselbaumer and Winter-Ebmer (2005) include the Russian Federation and Paci and Reilly (2004) include Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.”
BackgroundEquity in mathematics education in Hong Kong: evidence from TIMSS 2011 to 2019
Qiu, X., & Leung, F. (2022) · Large-scale Assessments in Education · doi:10.1186/s40536-022-00121-z · Cited by 22
“For example, Stoet and Geary (2015) found that for overall achievement across reading, mathematics, and science literacy in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), girls outperformed boys in most countries, including many where there are considerable gaps in the political or…”
BackgroundRowe, S. L., Zimmer‐Gembeck, M. J., & Hood, M. (2016) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.04.001 · Cited by 17
Halkjelsvik, T., & Jørgensen, M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74953-2 · Cited by 25
Ideological Bias in the Psychology of Sex and Gender
Giudice, M. D. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29148-7_28 · Cited by 18
Expert performance of men and women: A cross-cultural study in the chess domain
Blanch, À. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.050 · Cited by 16
Gender achievement and social, political and economic equality: a European perspective
Ireson, G. (2016) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2016.1237868 · Cited by 17
“Stoet and Geary (2015) further note that stratification hypotheses”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialGENDER EQUALITY AND THE GENDER GAP IN MATHEMATICS
Tao, H., & Michalopoulos, C. (2017) · Journal of Biosocial Science · doi:10.1017/s0021932017000141 · Cited by 18
The Male Gender Empathy Gap: Time for psychology to take action.
Farrell, W. S., Seager, M., & Barry, J. A. (2016) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 15
Lubinski, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2009042117 · Cited by 15
Wei, B., Qiang, D., & Jialing, M. (2020) · Chinese Education & Society · doi:10.1080/10611932.2020.1791538 · Cited by 16
Viberg, O. (2015) · Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) · Cited by 15
Optimism Predictive Ability and Psychological Flexibility among Students during COVID-19 Pandemic
Salah, B. M., Alhamad, N. F., Alazzam, A. A., Albadarneh, M. M., Alqiam, H. A. A., & Rababah, M. A. (2022) · Journal of Educational and Social Research · doi:10.36941/jesr-2022-0134 · Cited by 16
Amador‐Licona, N., Mendoza, J. M. G., Briceño-Martínez, I., Rodríguez-Bogarín, B. A., & Villegas-Elizarrarás, L. M. (2020) · Nova Scientia · doi:10.21640/ns.v12i24.2251 · Cited by 13
Academic Stress, Social Support, and Adjustment Among International Students in India
Joseph, M., & Sudhesh, N. T. (2023) · Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education · doi:10.32674/jcihe.v15i3.4756 · Cited by 24
“Women demonstrated better maintenance and processing of social support, and some studies have also indicated their superior academic achievement (Belle, 1991; Stoet & Geary, 2015; Voyer & Voyer, 2014).”
ResultComparing Spatial Ability of Male and Female Students Completing Humanities vs. Technical Degrees
Есипенко, Е. А., Павловна, М. Е., Budakova, A. V., Sharafieva, K. R., Ismatullina, V. I., Feklicheva, I. V., Chipeeva, N., Soldatova, E. L., Borodaeva, Z. E., Rimfeld, K., et al. (2018) · Psychology in Russia State of Art · doi:10.11621/pir.2018.0403 · Cited by 12
“By contrast, girls, on average, showed higher performance in reading than in math and science in all countries (Stoet & Geary, 2015).”
Silm, G., Must, O., & Täht, K. (2019) · Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.3176/tr.2019.3.06 · Cited by 14
“Gender differences have been found to be a factor in educational achievement (Duckworth and Seligman 2006, Pekkarinen 2012, Stoet and Geary 2015, Voyer and Voyer 2014), as well as in test-taking motivation (DeMars, Bashkov and Socha 2013) and in social desirability with regard to questionnaire…”
BackgroundWong, W. I., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.009 · Cited by 12
Effective University Instructors as Perceived by Turkish and Omani University Students
Al-Busaidi, S. S., Aldhafri, S., & Büyükyavuz, O. (2016) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244016662900 · Cited by 12
Creativity in liberal education before and after study commencement
van Goch, M. M. (2018) · International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd) · doi:10.4995/head18.2018.8228 · Cited by 11
“However, since there is much debate in the literature about these kind of sex differences (Miller & Hapern, 2014; Stoet & Geary, 2015), and since these sex differences did not occur across the board in this study, these results should be interpreted with caution and further research investigating…”
ResultKaynak, Ü., Kaynak, S., & Koçak, S. S. (2023) · RMLE Online · doi:10.1080/19404476.2023.2171655 · Cited by 17
Psychometric Properties of the WRAT Math Computation Subtest in Mexican Adolescents
Abreu‐Mendoza, R. A., Chamorro, Y., & Matute, E. (2018) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282918809793 · Cited by 11
“Whereas most studies find higher performance in boys (Diamantopoulou, Pina, Valero-Garcia, González-Salinas, & Fuentes, 2012; Stoet & Geary, 2015), others have found that girls outperform boys in curriculum-based measurements (Yarbrough, Cannon, Bergman, Kidder-Ashley, & McCane-Bowling, 2017), and…”
MethodResultCascella, C., Williams, J. S., & Pampaka, M. (2021) · European Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1177/1474904121997211 · Cited by 17
“In contrast, recent few studies (e.g. Ireson, 2017; Stoet and Geary, 2015, 2018), claimed that there is no significant correlation between mathematics attainment and a gender biased environment drawing on national measures (i.e. PISA and the Global Gender Gap Index respectively).”
ResultSex differences in first graders' literacy skills are mediated by parental input
Vasilyeva, M., Вениаминовна, А. И., Coughlan, M., & Kardanova, E. Y. (2021) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101318 · Cited by 17
Gender Dimensions of Education Access and Achievement in Sri Lanka
Shojo, M., Ebenezer, R., & Aturupane, H. (2018) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/30624 · Cited by 10
Heterosis in COMT Val158Met Polymorphism Contributes to Sex-Differences in Children’s Math Anxiety
Júlio-Costa, A., Martins, A. A. S., Wood, G. M. D. O., Almeida, M. P., de Miranda, M., Haase, V. G., & Carvalho, M. R. S. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01013 · Cited by 15
Personal Innovativeness and Employability: How Personal Traits Affect Employer Attractiveness
Pilav-Velić, A., Selimović, J., & Jahić, H. (2020) · Eurasian studies in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48505-4_2 · Cited by 11
The Not So Subtle and Status Quo Maintaining Nature of Everyday Sexism
Vescio, T. K., & Kosakowska‐Berezecka, N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561716.019 · Cited by 10
Zambrana, I. M., Dearing, E., Nærde, A., & Zachrisson, H. D. (2015) · European Early Childhood Education Research Journal · doi:10.1080/1350293x.2015.1035538 · Cited by 10
“…severe longlasting impairments, together with the historically recent educational falling back in boys compared to girls (Huttenlocher et al. 1991; Stoet and Geary 2015; Tomblin et al. 1997), could reflect broader differences in biological maturational courses and, in turn, differential…”
BackgroundHow Does Schooling Affect Inequality in Cognitive Skills? The View From Seasonal Comparison Research
Downey, D. B. (2023) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543231210005 · Cited by 12
“…favored boys, but as girls’ school performance has improved relative to boys both in the united States (DiPrete & Buchmann, 2013) and internationally (Stoet & geary, 2015, 2018, 2020), this position has shifted, with scholars now wondering if schools might favor girls (Rosin, 2012; Tyre, 2008).”
Söderlund, T., & Madison, G. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2407-x · Cited by 9
“…in patterns predicted by evolutionary theories, in particular those related to differential parental investment, costly signaling, and mate selection (e.g., Buss and Shackelford 2008; Stoet and Geary 2015; Verweij et al. 2016; Wåhlin-Jacobsen et al. 2015; for reviews, see Buss 2003; Schmitt 2005).”
BackgroundGindi, S., Kohan-Mass, J., & Pilpel, A. (2019) · Roeper Review · doi:10.1080/02783193.2019.1622163 · Cited by 10
“Nonetheless, they found that while boys fell behind across subjects, it was the opposite for the children at the high tail-end of the distribution, where boys did better (Stoet & Geary, 2015).”
BackgroundIlmarinen, V., Vainikainen, M., & Lönnqvist, J. (2022) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070221088155 · Cited by 9
“In Finland, sex differences have been slightly larger than average (between d = .18 and d = .28; Stoet & Geary, 2015).”
BackgroundGender Dimensions of Inequality in the Countries of Central Asia, South Caucasus, and Western CISPreprint
Khitarishvili, T. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2727425 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stoet, Gijsbert
- Venue
- Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 48
- Pages
- 137-151
- ISSN
- 0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969032653
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 18.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Keywords
- gender equality, PISA, mathematics achievement, girls' academic performance, political equality, economic equality, women's underrepresentation in leadership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review