Cited by 36Digital Mental Health InterventionsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via Writing

A next-generation social media-based relapse prevention intervention for youth depression: qualitative data on user experience outcomes for social networking, safety, and clinical benefit

Open access
Santesteban-Echarri, Olga, Rice, Simon, Wadley, Greg, Lederman, Reeva, D'Alfonso, Simon, Russon, Penni, Chambers, Richard, Miles, Christopher J. +4 more·2017·Internet Interventions

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) has a high prevalence and relapse rate among young people. For many individuals depression exhibits a severe course, and it is therefore critical to invest in innovative online interventions for depression that are cost-effective, acceptable and feasible. At present, there is a scarcity of research reporting on qualitative data regarding the subjective user experience of young people using social networking-based interventions for depression. This study provides in-depth qualitative insights generated from 38 semi-structured interviews, and a follow-up focus group, with young people (15-25 years) after the implementation of a moderated online social therapy intervention for depression relapse prevention ("Rebound"). Exploratory analysis identified patterns of content from interview data related to three main themes: 1) preferred content compared to perceived helpfulness of the online platform, 2) interest in social networking, and 3) protective environment. Two clear groups emerged; those who perceived the social networking component of the intervention as the most helpful component; and those who preferred to engage in therapy content, receiving individualized content suggested by moderators. The Rebound intervention was shown to be acceptable for young people with major depression. Integration of social networking features appears to enhance intervention engagement for some young people recovering from depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2017.06.002

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Collin P. Literature Review: The Benefits of Social Networking Services, Melbourne, Australia 2011
  2. Lederman R. Moderated online social therapy: designing and evaluating ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2 1 2014 1 27
  3. Rouf K. Fennell M. Westbrook D. Cooper M. Bennett-Levy J. Devising effective behavioural experiments, Oxford guide to behavioural experiments in cognitive therapy 2004 21 58

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santesteban-Echarri, O., Rice, S., Wadley, G., Lederman, R., D'Alfonso, S., Russon, P., Chambers, R., Miles, C. J., Gilbertson, T., Gleeson, J. F., McGorry, P. D., & Álvarez-Jiménez, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
9
Pages
65-73
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2734021185
Cited by
36
References
71
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
relapse prevention, adolescent depression, major depressive disorder, social networking, user experience, treatment acceptability, intervention engagement, digital mental health interventions, youth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review