Cited by 484Mental Health and Patient InvolvementMental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health Interventions

Efficacy of peer support interventions for depression: a meta-analysis

Open access
Pfeiffer, Paul N., Heisler, Michele, Piette, John D., Rogers, Mary A.M., Valenstein, Marcia·2011·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To assess the efficacy of peer support for reducing symptoms of depression. Methods Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases were searched for clinical trials published as of April 2010 using Medical Subject Headings and free text terms related to depression and peer support. Two independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared a peer support intervention for depression to usual care or a psychotherapy control condition. Meta-analyses were conducted to generate pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) in the change in depressive symptoms between study conditions. Results Seven RCTs of peer support versus usual care for depression involving 869 participants were identified. Peer support interventions were superior to usual care in reducing depressive symptoms, with a pooled SMD of -0.59 (95% CI: −0.98, −0.21; p=0.002). Seven RCTs with 301 total participants compared peer support to group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). There was not a statistically significant difference between group CBT and peer interventions, with a pooled SMD of 0.10 (95% CI: −0.20, 0.39 p=0.53). Conclusion Based on the available evidence, peer support interventions help reduce symptoms of depression. Additional studies are needed to determine effectiveness in primary care and other settings with limited mental health resources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.10.002

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfeiffer, P. N., Heisler, M., Piette, J. D., Rogers, M. A. M., & Valenstein, M.
Affiliations
  • Health Services Research & Development (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Pfeiffer, Paul N.
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
29-36
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063974176
Cited by
484
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK020572, P60DK020572, P30DK092926, P30DK020572)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024986)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
peer support, depression, depressive symptoms, peer support programs, group cognitive behavioral therapy, usual care, treatment efficacy, primary care mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peer Group, Psychotherapy, Self-Help Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review