Cited by 28Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Internet-delivered cognitive therapy for social anxiety disorder in Hong Kong: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Thew, Graham R., Kwok, Amy P.L., Lissillour Chan, Mandy H., Powell, Candice L.Y.M., Wild, Jennifer, Leung, Patrick W.L., Clark, David M.·2022·Internet Interventions

Abstract

Background: Research is needed to determine the extent to which internet-delivered psychological therapies are effective when delivered in countries and cultures outside of where they were developed. Objective: This waitlist-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of a UK-developed, therapist-guided internet Cognitive Therapy programme for Social Anxiety Disorder (iCT-SAD) when delivered in Hong Kong by local therapists. Methods: Patients were randomized to iCT-SAD (n = 22) or a waitlist control group (n = 22). Assessments took place at weeks 0, 8, and 15 (posttreatment/postwait), with a further 3-month follow-up assessment for the iCT-SAD group. The primary outcome measure was the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (self-report), and posttreatment/postwait diagnostic assessments were completed by independent assessors blind to condition. Trial Registration: ISRCTN11357117. Results: 2.41). The treatment was also superior to waitlist on all secondary outcome measures. 86% of the iCT-SAD group demonstrated remission from SAD based on the LSAS, compared to 5% of the waitlist group. 73% no longer met diagnostic criteria at posttreatment, compared to 9% of the waitlist group. The gains made by the iCT-SAD group were maintained at three-month follow-up. Conclusions: iCT-SAD showed strong efficacy for the treatment of SAD in Hong Kong. As the clinical outcomes were similar to UK studies, this suggests the dissemination of the treatment into a different cultural setting did not result in a substantial loss of efficacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100539

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brown T.A. Barlow D.H. Anxiety And Related Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-5 (ADIS-5).: Adult Version. Client Interview Schedule 2014 Oxford University Press
  2. Oxford Centre for Anxiety Disorders and Trauma OXCADAT Resources: Resources for cognitive therapy for PTSD, social anxiety disorder and panic disorder https://oxcadatresources.com/ 2019

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thew, G. R., Kwok, A. P. L., Lissillour Chan, M. H., Powell, C. L. Y. M., Wild, J., Leung, P. W. L., & Clark, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Hospital Authority (HK)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Thew, Graham R.
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
28
Pages
100539
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224316453
Cited by
28
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (102176)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (00070, 069777, 200796)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, cross-cultural dissemination, treatment efficacy, Hong Kong, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, remission, maintenance of treatment gains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review