Cited by 422Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsHealthcare Systems and Public Health

Progression of Coronary Calcium and Incident Coronary Heart Disease Events

Open access
Budoff, Matthew J., Young, Rebekah, Lopez, Victor A., Kronmal, Richard A., Nasir, Khurram, Blumenthal, Roger S., Detrano, Robert C., Bild, Diane E. +8 more·2013·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The study examined whether progression of coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a predictor of future coronary heart disease (CHD) events.Background CAC predicts CHD events and serial measurement of CAC has been proposed to evaluate atherosclerosis progression.Methods We studied 6,778 persons (52.8% female) aged 45 to 84 years from the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) study. A total of 5,682 persons had baseline and follow-up CAC scans approximately 2.5 ± 0.8 years apart; multiple imputation was used to account for the remainder (n = 1,096) missing follow-up scans. Median follow-up duration from the baseline was 7.6 (max = 9.0) years. CAC change was assessed by absolute change between baseline and follow-up CAC. Cox proportional hazards regression providing hazard ratios (HRs) examined the relation of change in CAC with CHD events, adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, baseline calcium score, and other risk factors.Results A total of 343 and 206 hard CHD events occurred. The annual change in CAC averaged 24.9 ± 65.3 Agatston units. Among persons without CAC at baseline (n = 3,396), a 5-unit annual change in CAC was associated with an adjusted HR (95% Confidence Interval) of 1.4 (1.0 to 1.9) for total and 1.5 (1.1 to 2.1) for hard CHD. Among those with CAC >0 at baseline, HRs (per 100 unit annual change) were 1.2 (1.1 to 1.4) and 1.3 (1.1 to 1.5), respectively. Among participants with baseline CAC, those with annual progression of ≥300 units had adjusted HRs of 3.8 (1.5 to 9.6) for total and 6.3 (1.9 to 21.5) for hard CHD compared to those without progression.Conclusions Progression of CAC is associated with an increased risk for future hard and total CHD events.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.035

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dyslipidemia leads to cardiovascular events by atherosclerotic plaque development and progression.

    “Dyslipidemia leads to CV events by atherosclerotic plaque development and progression (5,6).”

    From Triglycerides and residual atherosclerotic risk (2021) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Budoff, M. J., Young, R., Lopez, V. A., Kronmal, R. A., Nasir, K., Blumenthal, R. S., Detrano, R. C., Bild, D. E., Guerci, A. D., Liu, K., Shea, S., Szklo, M., Post, W., Lima, J., Bertoni, A., & Wong, N. D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Baptist Hospital of Miami (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
  • St. Francis Hospital (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
Corresponding author
Wong, Nathan D.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
61
Issue
12
Pages
1231-1239
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129783757
Cited by
422
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
26.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc95164-17-0-1, n01hc95165-34-0-1, n01hc95161-24-0-1, n01hc095169-003, n01hc95166-21-0-1, n01hc95162-31-0-1, n01hc95168-27-0-1, n01hc95160-18-0-1, n01hc095167-000, n01hc95163-22-0-1, n01hc95159-40-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01 HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC095169, R01HL071739, N01 HC-95168, N01 HC95167, (N01-HC-95163, N01 HC-95161, N01 HC95165, N01HC95164, N01-HC-095159, N01-HC, N01-HC-095162, N01‐HC‐95166, N01 HC-95162, HC95159, N01 HC95169)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Keywords
coronary artery calcium, atherosclerosis progression, incident cardiovascular events, Agatston units, cardiovascular risk prediction, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Asian, Black or African American, Calcinosis, Coronary Artery Disease, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Ethnicity, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, United States, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Disease Progression, White People, Multidetector Computed Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review