Cited by 223Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsLipid metabolism and disorders

A Test in Context: Lipid Profile, Fasting Versus Nonfasting

Open access
Nordestgaard, Børge G.·2017·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Fasting for >8 h, as previously required for lipid profiles, normally only occurs a few hours before breakfast. By contrast, the nonfasting state predominates most of a 24-h cycle and better captures atherogenic lipoprotein levels. Plasma contains atherogenic lipoproteins of hepatic origin in the fasting state and additionally those of intestinal origin in the nonfasting state. Maximal mean changes for random, nonfasting versus fasting levels are +26 mg/dl for triglycerides, -8 mg/dl for total cholesterol, -8 mg/dl for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, +8 mg/dl for remnant cholesterol, and -8 mg/dl for non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein B, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol are largely unaffected. For patients, laboratories, and clinicians alike, nonfasting lipid profiles represent a simplification without negative implications for prognostic, diagnostic, and therapeutic options for cardiovascular disease prevention. Several societies' guidelines and statements in Denmark, the United Kingdom, Europe, Canada, Brazil, and the United States endorse nonfasting lipid profiles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.006

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nonfasting lipid profiles can potentially be more relevant to the estimation of an individual's cardiovascular risk than fasting lipids since in real life the postprandial state predominates most of the 24-h cycle.

    “Nonfasting lipid profiles, therefore, can potentially be more relevant to the estimation of an individual's cardiovascular risk than fasting lipids since in real life the postprandial state predominates most of our 24-h cycle [15,16].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nordestgaard, B. G.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Nordestgaard, Børge G.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
70
Issue
13
Pages
1637-1646
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2756375940
Cited by
223
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
fasting lipid profile, atherogenic lipoproteins, triglycerides, remnant cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein B, cardiovascular risk assessment, cardiovascular disease prevention
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Fasting, Humans, Lipids, Reproducibility of Results, Dyslipidemias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review