Cited by 327Mast cells and histamineFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseases

Mast cell activation syndrome: Proposed diagnostic criteria

Open access
Akin, Cem, Valent, Peter, Metcalfe, Dean D.·2010·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

The term mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is finding increasing use as a diagnosis for subjects who present with signs and symptoms involving the dermis, gastrointestinal track, and cardiovascular system frequently accompanied by neurologic complaints. Such patients often have undergone multiple extensive medical evaluations by different physicians in varied disciplines without a definitive medical diagnosis until the diagnosis of MCAS is applied. However, MCAS as a distinct clinical entity has not been generally accepted, nor do there exist definitive criteria for diagnosis. Based on current understanding of this disease "syndrome" and on what we do know about mast cell activation and resulting pathology, we will explore and propose criteria for its diagnosis. The proposed criteria will be discussed in the context of other disorders involving mast cells or with similar presentations and as a basis for further scientific study and validation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.035

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If an IgE-dependent allergy or other underlying reactive disease is present without clonal MC, the diagnosis is secondary MCAS.

    “If an IgE-dependent allergy or other underlying reactive disease (e.g., IgE-dependent or other hypersensitivity disorder) is present in the absence of clonal MC, the diagnosis is secondary MCAS (Table 2, Figure 2).”

    From Proposed Diagnostic Algorithm for Patients with Suspected Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [26]

    In “Proposed Criteria for the diagnosis of idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome,” the paper calls this a secondary mast cell activation disorder when clonal markers are absent and an allergic or other concurrent disease is established. It proposes an MCAS diagnosis only after secondary diseases associated with mast cell activation have been eliminated, contrary to the cited sentence’s diagnosis of “secondary MCAS.” (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients with clonal KIT-mutated CD25+ MC but only one or two minor SM criteria and no major SM criterion, as well as those with cutaneous mastocytosis or SM, are classified as primary clonal MCAS.

    “These patients as well as those with cutaneous mastocytosis (CM) or SM are both classified as primary (clonal) MCAS (Table 2).”

    From Proposed Diagnostic Algorithm for Patients with Suspected Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [26]

    The section on primary mast cell activation identifies patients with one or two minor mastocytosis criteria as having MMAS. But the proposed diagnostic criteria section explicitly says patients with urticaria pigmentosa, a form of cutaneous mastocytosis, are excluded from an MCAS diagnosis; it assigns patients with clonal markers to systemic mastocytosis or MMAS according to WHO criteria. The copy does not classify all these patients together as primary (clonal) MCAS. Page numbers are unavailable in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The most specific and reliable indicator of systemic mast cell activation is a transient, event-related, substantial rise in serum tryptase above the patient's own baseline.

    “the most specific and reliable marker of systemic MC activation is an acute and substantial event-related (transient) increase in the serum tryptase level over the individual’s baseline value.”

    From Why the 20% + 2 Tryptase Formula Is a Diagnostic Gold Standard for Severe Systemic Mast Cell Activation and Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [17]

    In the proposed diagnostic criteria section (page unavailable), the paper says tryptase rises transiently during mast cell activation and recommends comparing levels measured during symptoms with the patient’s baseline. It does not establish that a substantial rise in tryptase is the most specific and reliable indicator compared with other mast-cell mediators, which it also recommends measuring. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • During and soon after a severe anaphylactic event, serum tryptase rises substantially above the individual's baseline.

    “during and shortly after a severe anaphylactic event where MC release large amounts of tryptase, the serum tryptase level increases substantially over the individual’s baseline (Fig. 1) [12–17].”

    From Why the 20% + 2 Tryptase Formula Is a Diagnostic Gold Standard for Severe Systemic Mast Cell Activation and Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Proposed Criteria section says serum tryptase should be measured within four hours of symptom onset, compared with the patient’s baseline, and rises transiently during mast-cell activation. It identifies anaphylaxis as a mast-cell activation disorder, but does not establish that the rise during a severe anaphylactic event is necessarily substantial. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Tryptase has repeatedly been described as the most specific and reliable biomarker of severe systemic mast cell activation in daily practice.

    “tryptase has been repeatedly described as the most specific and reliable biomarker of severe systemic MC activation in daily practice [12–18].”

    From Why the 20% + 2 Tryptase Formula Is a Diagnostic Gold Standard for Severe Systemic Mast Cell Activation and Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [17]

    The proposed diagnostic criteria section (page unavailable) identifies serum tryptase as a test for documenting mast cell activation during symptomatic episodes. It also lists other mediator tests and does not establish that tryptase is the most specific or reliable biomarker for severe systemic activation in daily practice. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akin, C., Valent, P., & Metcalfe, D. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology (AT)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Metcalfe, Dean D.
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
126
Issue
6
Pages
1099-1104.e4
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003100495
Cited by
327
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (P21173-B13)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Z01AI000249, ZIAAI000249)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
mast cell activation syndrome, diagnostic criteria, mast cell activation, mast cell disease, dermal symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms, neurological symptoms, unexplained symptoms
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Multiple, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Mast Cells, Syndrome, Prostaglandin D2, Cell Degranulation, Cytokines, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Leukotriene C4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review