Cited by 138Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionMental Health Research Topics

Dimensions in major depressive disorder and their relevance for treatment outcome

Open access
Vrieze, Elske, Demyttenaere, Koen, Bruffaerts, Ronny, Hermans, Dirk, Pizzagalli, Diego A., Sienaert, Pascal, Hompes, Titia, de Boer, Peter +2 more·2014·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a heterogeneous disease. More homogeneous psycho(patho)logical dimensions would facilitate MDD research as well as clinical practice. The first aim of this study was to find potential dimensions within a broad psychopathological assessment in depressed patients. Second, we aimed at examining how these dimensions predicted course in MDD.Methods Ten psychopathological variables were assessed in 75 MDD inpatients. Factor and regression analyses assessed putative relations between psychopathological factors and depression severity and outcome after 8 weeks of treatment.Results A 3-factor model (eigenvalue: 54.4%) was found, representing a psychomotor change, anhedonia and negative affect factor. Anhedonia and negative affect predicted depression severity (R(2)=0.37, F=20.86, p<0.0001). Anhedonia predicted non-response (OR 6.00, CI 1.46-24.59) and both negative affect (OR 5.69, CI 1.19-27.20) and anhedonia predicted non-remission (OR 9.28, CI 1.85-46.51).Limitations The sample size of the study was relatively modest, limiting the number of variables included in the analysis.Conclusions Results confirm that psychomotor change, anhedonia and negative affect are key MDD dimensions, two of which are related to treatment outcome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.020

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anhedonia is a negative prognostic factor for treatment outcome in adolescents and adults.

    “Furthermore, it was shown that anhedonia is a negative prognostic factor for treatment outcome both in adolescents (McMakin et al., 2012) and adults (Spijker et al., 2001; Vrieze et al., 2014).”

    From Circuit Mechanisms of Reward, Anhedonia, and Depression (2019) · cites this paper as Vrieze et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vrieze, E., Demyttenaere, K., Bruffaerts, R., Hermans, D., Pizzagalli, D. A., Sienaert, P., Hompes, T., de Boer, P., Schmidt, M., & Claes, S.
Affiliations
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
Corresponding author
Vrieze, Elske
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
155
Pages
35-41
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102019801
Cited by
138
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
FWCI
9.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH068376, R21MH078979, R01 MH68376)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
major depressive disorder, psychopathological dimensions, anhedonia, negative affect, psychomotor changes, treatment outcomes, treatment non-response, depression severity, hospitalized patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Major Depressive Disorder, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychopathology, Regression Analysis, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review