Cited by 328Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

Meta-review of depressive subtyping models

Harald, Baumeister, Gordon, Parker·2012·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Increasing dissatisfaction with the non-specificity of major depression has led many to propose more specific depressive subtyping models. The present meta-review seeks to map dominant depressive subtype models, and highlight definitions and overlaps.Methods A database search in Medline and EMBASE of proposed depressive subtypes, and limited to reviews published between 2000 and 2011, was undertaken. Of the more than four thousand reviews, 754 were judged as potentially relevant and provided the base for the present selective meta-review.Results Fifteen subtype models were identified. The subtypes could be divided into five molar categories of (1) symptom-based subtypes, such as melancholia, psychotic depression, atypical depression and anxious depression, (2) aetiologically-based subtypes, exemplified by adjustment disorders, early trauma depression, reproductive depression, perinatal depression, organic depression and drug-induced depression, (3) time of onset-based subtypes, as illustrated by early and late onset depression, as well as seasonal affective disorder, (4) gender-based (e.g. female) depression, and (5) treatment resistant depression. An overview considering definition, bio-psycho-social correlates and the evidence base of treatment options for each subtype is provided.Limitations Despite the large data base, this meta-review is nevertheless narrative focused.Conclusions Subtyping depression is a promising attempt to overcome the non-specificity of many diagnostic constructs such as major depression, both in relation to their intrinsic non-specificity and failure to provide treatment-specific information. If a subtyping model is to be advanced it would need, however, to demonstrate differential impacts of causes and treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2011.07.015

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For analyses of moderators, P-values were corrected following Bonferroni-Holm.

    “Since these analyses of moderators are explorative in nature, P -values were corrected following Bonferroni-Holm. 31”
  • Several studies have reported that subthreshold depressions did not differ from diagnosable depression with respect to variables such as risk for future depressive episodes, family history of mental illness, psychiatric and physical comorbidity, and functional impairment.

    “Several studies 52,53 have reported that subthreshold depressions (i.e., conditions characterized by the presence of less than five depressive symptoms or signs) did not differ from diagnosable depression with respect to variables such as the risk for future depressive episodes, the family history of mental illness (including depression), psychiatric and physical comorbidity, and functional impair”
  • FCS alterations in these regions have been proven to be related to regulation of widespread cognitive, emotional, and executive control functions in MDD.

    “The FCS alterations in these regions have been proven to be related to the regulation of widespread cognitive, emotional, and executive control functions in patients with MDD [6, 42-50].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 213 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harald, B., & Gordon, P.
Affiliations
Black Dog Institute (AU)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
139
Issue
2
Pages
126-140
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059553907
Cited by
328
References
213
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
depression subtypes, major depressive disorder, melancholia, psychotic depression, atypical depression, anxious depression, perinatal depression, organic depression, drug-induced depression, seasonal affective disorder, early-onset depression, late-onset depression, depression in women, treatment-resistant depression, etiology of depression, differential treatment
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review