Cited by 296Impact of Technology on AdolescentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Impulse inhibition in people with Internet addiction disorder: Electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study

Dong, Guangheng, Lu, Qilin, Zhou, Hui, Zhao, Xuan·2010·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

We investigated response inhibition in people with Internet addiction disorder (IAD) by recording event-related brain potentials during a Go/NoGo task. Twelve IAD-afflicted and 12 normal university students participated in the study. Results show that the IAD group exhibited lower NoGo-N2 amplitude, higher NoGo-P3 amplitude, and longer NoGo-P3 peak latency than the normal group. The results also suggest that the IAD students had lower activation in the conflict detection stage than the normal group; thus, they had to engage in more cognitive endeavors to complete the inhibition task in the late stage. In addition, the IAD students showed less efficiency in information processing and lower impulse control than their normal peers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.09.002

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In contrast, in some studies no such alteration of inhibitory control is found (Dong et al., 2010; Dong et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2015; Sun et al 2009; Wang et al., 2017d; Zhang et al., 2016).

    “En contraste, en algunos estudios no se da tal alteración (Dong et al., 2010; Dong et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2015; Sun et al 2009; Wang et al., 2017d; Zhang et al., 2016)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, G., Lu, Q., Zhou, H., & Zhao, X.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Dong, Guangheng
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
485
Issue
2
Pages
138-142
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045800887
Cited by
296
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
41.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
internet addiction, response inhibition, impulse control, event-related potentials, go/no-go task, Nogo-N2, Nogo-P3, conflict detection, processing efficiency
MeSH terms
Adult, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Neural Inhibition, Behavior, Addictive, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review