Treatment credibility, expectancy, and preference: Prediction of treatment engagement and outcome in a randomized clinical trial of hatha yoga vs. health education as adjunct treatments for depression
Open accessAbstract
Background Hatha yoga may be helpful for alleviating depression symptoms. The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether treatment program preference, credibility, or expectancy predict engagement in depression interventions (yoga or a control class) or depression symptom severity over time.Methods This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of hatha yoga vs. a health education control group for treatment of depression. Depressed participants (n = 122) attended up to 20 classes over a period of 10 weeks, and then completed additional assessments after 3 and 6 months. We assessed treatment preference prior to randomization, and treatment credibility and expectancy after participants attended their first class. Treatment "concordance" indicated that treatment preference matched assigned treatment.Results Treatment credibility, expectancy, and concordance were not associated with treatment engagement. Treatment expectancy moderated the association between treatment group and depression. Depression severity over time differed by expectancy level for the yoga group but not for the health education group. Controlling for baseline depression, participants in the yoga group with an average or high expectancy for improvement showed lower depression symptoms across the acute intervention and follow-up period than those with a low expectancy for improvement. There was a trend for a similar pattern for credibility. Concordance was not associated with treatment outcome.Limitations This is a secondary, post-hoc analysis and should be considered hypothesis-generating.Conclusions Results suggest that expectancy improves the likelihood of success only for a intervention thought to actively target depression (yoga) and not a control intervention.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Uebelacker (2018) presents study data with a line graph rather than exact numbers, and it was hard to abstract.
“Uebelacker (2018) presents study data with a line graph rather than exact numbers, and we find it hard to abstract it [61]”
From The effectiveness of mindfulness yoga on patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2023) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Ibrahim, H. M., Carmody, T. J., Arnow, B., Klein, D. N., Markowitz, J. C., Ninan, P. T., Kornstein, S., Manber, R., et al. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01866-8 · Cited by 3,829 · see citing works
Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Devilly, G. J., & Borkovec, T. D. (2000) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0005-7916(00)00012-4 · Cited by 2,295 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We used the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) (Devilly and Borkovec, 2000).”
MethodPRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
Gelenberg, A. J., Freeman, P. B., Markowitz, J. C., Rosenbaum, J. F., Thase, M. E., Trivedi, M. H., & Rhoads, R. S. (2010) · Cited by 1,372 · see citing works
Cramer, H., Lauche, R., Langhorst, J., & Dobos, G. (2013) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22166 · Cited by 708 · see citing works
Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis
Lindhiem, O., Bennett, C. B., Trentacosta, C. J., & McLear, C. (2014) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2014.06.002 · Cited by 315 · cited 2× · see citing works
“17) effect of concordance on outcome (Lindhiem et al., 2014).”
BackgroundRaue, P. J., Schulberg, H. C., Heo, M., Klimstra, S., & BRUCE, M. L. (2009) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.60.3.337 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Kwan, B. M., Dimidjian, S., & Rizvi, S. L. (2010) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.04.003 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
A systematic review of yoga for major depressive disorder
Cramer, H., Anheyer, D., Lauche, R., & Dobos, G. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.006 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
A Cohort Study of Adherence to Antidepressants in Primary Care
Hunot, V., Horne, R., Leese, M. N., & Churchill, R. C. (2007) · The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/pcc.v09n0202 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Raue, P. J., Schulberg, H. C., Heo, M., et al. (2009) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.2009.60.3.337 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Does Study Design Influence Outcome?
Rutherford, B. R., Sneed, J. R., & Roose, S. P. (2009) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000209348 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Rutherford, B. R., Wager, T., & Roose, S. (2010) · Current Psychiatry Reviews · doi:10.2174/157340010790596571 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Dunlop, B. W., Kelley, M. E., Aponte‐Rivera, V., Mletzko, T., Kinkead, B. L., Ritchie, J., Nemeroff, C. B., Craighead, W. E., Mayberg, H. S., & for the PReDICT Team (2017) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16050517 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
de Manincor, M., Bensoussan, A., Smith, C. A., Barr, K., Schweickle, M. M., Donoghoe, L.-L., Bourchier, S., & Fahey, P. P. (2016) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22502 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Therapy outcome questions requiring control of credibility and treatment-generated expectancies
Kazdin, A. E. (1979) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(79)80011-8 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
El Alaoui, S., Ljótsson, B., Hedman, E., Kaldo, V., Andersson, E., Rück, C., Andersson, G., & Lindefors, N. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124258 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Kinser, P. A., Elswick, R. K., & Kornstein, S. (2014) · Archives of Psychiatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2014.08.014 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Should treatment for depression be based more on patient preference?
Winter, S., & Barber, J. (2013) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s52746 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Adjunctive yoga v. health education for persistent major depression: a randomized controlled trial
Uebelacker, L. A., Tremont, G. N., GILLETTE, L. T., Epstein-Lubow, G. P., Strong, D. R., Abrantes, A. M., Tyrka, A. R., Tran, T., Gaudiano, B. A., & Miller, I. W. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291717000575 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Principles and Practice of Yoga in Health Care
McCall, T. (2016) · Cited by 58 · see citing works
The self-management of longer-term depression: learning from the patient, a qualitative study
Chambers, E., Cook, S., Thake, A., Foster, A., Shaw, S., Hutten, R., Parry, G. D., & Ricketts, T. (2015) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0550-6 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Mooney, T. K., Gibbons, M. B. C., Gallop, R., Mack, R. A., & Crits-Christoph, P. F. (2013) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.847988 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Uebelacker, L. A., Kraines, M. A., Broughton, M. K., Tremont, G. N., GILLETTE, L. T., Epstein-Lubow, G. P., Abrantes, A. M., Battle, C. L., & Miller, I. W. (2017) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2017.06.008 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW, 2001 Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders, Research version, Patient edition with Psychotic Screen (SCID-I/P W/ PSY SCREEN) Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Haslam, C., Cruwys, T., Chang, M. X. L., Bentley, S. V., Haslam, S. A., Dingle, G. A., & Jetten, J. (2019) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000427 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Zhi, W. I., Baser, R. E., Zhi, L. M., Talukder, D., Li, Q. S., Paul, T., Patterson, C., Piulson, L., Seluzicki, C., Galantino, M. L., et al. (2021) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.4098 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Miao, C., Gao, Y., Li, X., Zhou, Y., Chung, J. W.-Y., & Smith, G. D. (2023) · BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies · doi:10.1186/s12906-023-04141-2 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“For example, Uebelacker (2018) presents study data with a line graph rather than exact numbers, and we find it hard to abstract it [61]; others, like Vollbehr’s, only provide baseline data [29].”
BackgroundSicard, V., O'Kane, K., Brown, O., Butterfield, L., Kardish, R., Choi, E., Healey, K., Silverberg, N. D., Smith, A., Goldfield, G., et al. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.44757 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Uebelacker, L. A., Weinstock, L. M., Battle, C. L., Abrantes, A. M., & Miller, I. W.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Uebelacker, Lisa A.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 238
- Pages
- 111-117
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6901089
- OpenAlex
- W2806472702
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R01NR012005)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Keywords
- hatha yoga, depression, treatment credibility, treatment expectancy, treatment preferences, treatment engagement, treatment concordance, health education, depression severity, treatment outcome prediction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Yoga, Treatment Outcome, Patient Preference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review