Cited by 192Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsTreatment of Major DepressionPhysical Activity and Health

A systematic review of yoga for major depressive disorder

Cramer, Holger, Anheyer, Dennis, Lauche, Romy, Dobos, Gustav·2017·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background The purpose of this review was to investigate the efficacy and safety of yoga interventions in treating patients with major depressive disorder.Methods MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were screened through December 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing yoga to inactive or active comparators in patients with major depressive disorder were eligible. Primary outcomes included remission rates and severity of depression. Anxiety and adverse events were secondary outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool.Results Seven RCTs with 240 participants were included. Risk of bias was unclear for most RCTs. Compared to aerobic exercise, no short- or medium-term group differences in depression severity was found. Higher short-term depression severity was found for yoga compared to electro-convulsive therapy; remission rates did not differ between groups. No short-term group differences occurred when yoga was compared to antidepressant medication. Conflicting evidence was found when yoga was compared to attention-control interventions, or when yoga as an add-on to antidepressant medication was compared to medication alone. Only two RCTs assessed adverse events and reported that no treatment-related adverse events were reported.Limitations Few RCTs with low sample size.Conclusions This review found some evidence for positive effects beyond placebo and comparable effects compared to evidence-based interventions. However, methodological problems and the unclear risk-benefit ratio preclude definitive recommendations for or against yoga as an adjunct treatment for major depressive disorder. Larger and adequately powered RCTs using non-inferiority designs are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.006

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cramer, H., Anheyer, D., Lauche, R., & Dobos, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Kliniken Essen-Mitte (DE)
Corresponding author
Cramer, Holger
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
213
Pages
70-77
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2587639260
Cited by
192
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 6
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
yoga, major depressive disorder, depression treatment, depression remission, depression severity, adverse events, aerobic exercise, electroconvulsive therapy, antidepressants, adjunctive therapy, non-inferiority
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Humans, Yoga, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review