Cited by 74Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major Depression

Prevalence of major depressive disorder in children and adolescents in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xu, Dan-Dan, Rao, Wen-Wang, Cao, Xiao-Lan, Wen, Si-Ying, Che, Weng-Ian, Ng, Chee H., Ungvari, Gabor S., Du, Yasong +2 more·2018·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Prevalence figures of major depressive disorder (MDD) in children and adolescents across various epidemiological studies have been inconclusive. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the pooled prevalence of MDD and its associated factors in children and adolescents in China.Method A systematic review and literature search were conducted covering PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Internet, WANFANG Data and SinoMed) to identify studies reporting the prevalence of MDD in children and adolescents in China. The pooled prevalence estimates and associated factors were examined using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis program, Version 2.Results Fourteen studies involving 82,592 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled point prevalence of MDD in Chinese children and adolescents was 1.3% (95% CI: 0.8%-2.0%). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses revealed that diagnostic criteria, age, year of survey and study quality were significantly associated with the prevalence of MDD.Conclusions The point prevalence of MDD in children and adolescents in China is similar to worldwide figures. Further national epidemiological studies with the view of developing effective intervention strategies should be considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.083

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, D.-D., Rao, W.-W., Cao, X.-L., Wen, S.-Y., Che, W.-I., Ng, C. H., Ungvari, G. S., Du, Y., Zhang, L., & Xiang, Y.-T.
Affiliations
  • Harbin University (CN)
  • University of Macau (MO)
  • Shenzhen KangNing Hospital (CN)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Ling
  • Xiang, Yu-Tao
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
241
Pages
592-598
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2887880034
Cited by
74
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universidade de Macau (MYRG2016-00005-FHS, MYRG2015-00230-FHS)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, childhood depression, adolescent depression, prevalence, China, risk factors, diagnostic criteria, age differences, study quality
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, China, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Prevalence, Epidemiologic Studies, Databases, Factual, Qualitative Research, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review