Cited by 129Impact of Technology on AdolescentsHealth disparities and outcomesMental Health via Writing

Emotional support from social media and face-to-face relationships: Associations with depression risk among young adults

Open access
Shensa, Ariel, Sidani, Jaime E., Escobar-Viera, César G., Switzer, Galen E., Primack, Brian A., Choukas-Bradley, Sophia·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background: Emotional support is highly protective against poor mental health. Though several measures of emotional support exist, none specifically addresses social media (SM) as a source of emotional support. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine if SM-based emotional support is an extension of or distinct construct from face-to-face (FTF) emotional support and to assess the independent associations between each domain of emotional support and depression risk among U.S. young adults. Methods: In March 2018, we surveyed 2408 18–30 year olds. We assessed perceived FTF emotional support with the brief PROMIS emotional support scale and perceived SM-based emotional support using a new four-item measure. Depression risk was assessed using the PHQ-9. We performed factor analysis (FA) to determine the underlying factor structure of all items and to develop composite scales. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the independent association between each resulting emotional support scale and depression risk. Results: FA revealed two distinct constructs. FTF emotional support was associated with 43% lower odds of depression per 1-unit increase on the 5-point scale (AOR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.52–0.63). However, SM-based emotional support was significantly associated with 20% greater odds of depression per 1-unit increase on the 5-point scale (AOR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.09–1.32). Limitations: This study utilized a cross-sectional design and self-report data. Conclusions: While FTF emotional support was associated with slightly lower odds of depression, SM-based emotional support was associated with slightly greater odds of depression. It may be valuable for clinicians treating individuals with depression to ask about sources of emotional support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.092

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Badoo, 2012 Generation lonely? 39 Percent of Americans spend More Time Socializing Online Than Face-To-Face [WWW Document]. URL. http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/generation-lonely-39-percent-americans-spend-more-time-socializing-online-than-face-1648444.htm?mwfsmw (Accessed 6.24.19).
  2. GlobalWebIndex, 2017 GWI Social: Quarterly Report on the Latest Trends in Social Networking. London, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shensa, A., Sidani, J. E., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Switzer, G. E., Primack, B. A., & Choukas-Bradley, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Corresponding author
Shensa, Ariel
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
260
Pages
38-44
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970966576
Cited by
129
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10
FWCI
27.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Labor
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R00MD012813, K99MD012813)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
emotional support, social media, face-to-face relationships, depression risk, young adults, PHQ-9, mental health, sources of social support
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Social Support, United States, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Young Adult, Self Report, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review