New English and Spanish social health measures will facilitate evaluating health determinants
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop psychometrically sound, culturally relevant, and linguistically equivalent English and Spanish self-report measures of social health guided by a comprehensive conceptual model and applicable across chronic illnesses. METHODS: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Social Health Workgroup implemented a mixed methods approach to evaluate earlier results (v1.0); expand and refine domain definitions and items; translate items into Spanish; and obtain qualitative feedback. Computer-based and paper/pencil questionnaire administration was conducted with a variety of U.S. respondent samples during 2009-2012. Analyses included exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), two-parameter logistic item response theory (IRT) modeling, evaluation of differential item functioning (DIF), and evaluation of criterion and construct validity. RESULTS: Qualitative feedback supported the conceptualization of the Social Health domain framework (Social Function and Social Relationships subcomponents). Validation testing participants (n = 2,208 English; n = 644 Spanish) were diverse in terms of gender, age, education, and ethnicity/race. EFA, CFA, and IRT identified 7 unidimensional factors with good model fit. There was no DIF by language, and good evidence of criterion and construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS English and Spanish language instruments (v2.0), including computer-adaptive tests and fixed-length short forms, are publicly available for assessment of Social Function (Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities) and Social Relationships (Companionship; Emotional, Informational and Instrumental Support; and Social Isolation). Measures of social health will play a key role in applications that use ecologic (or determinants of health) models that emphasize how patients' social environments influence their health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 32 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The measures showed good evidence of construct validity.
“There was no DIF by language, and good evidence of criterion and construct validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The convenience samples of English- and Spanish-speaking respondents are adequate for establishing measures applicable across chronic illnesses.
- Findingown data
Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and item response theory modeling identified seven unidimensional factors with good model fit.
“EFA, CFA and IRT identified seven unidimensional factors with good model fit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The convenience samples of English- and Spanish-speaking respondents are adequate for establishing measures applicable across chronic illnesses.
- Findingown data
The measures showed good evidence of criterion validity.
“There was no DIF by language, and good evidence of criterion and construct validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The convenience samples of English- and Spanish-speaking respondents are adequate for establishing measures applicable across chronic illnesses.
- Findingown data
Qualitative patient feedback supported the Social Health domain framework consisting of Social Function and Social Relationships sub-components.
“Qualitative feedback supported the conceptualization of the Social Health domain framework (Social Function and Social Relationships sub-components).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Qualitative feedback from cancer patients is adequate to support the Social Health domain framework for use across chronic illnesses.
- Findingown data
The measures showed no differential item functioning by language.
“There was no DIF by language, and good evidence of criterion and construct validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The convenience samples of English- and Spanish-speaking respondents are adequate for establishing measures applicable across chronic illnesses.
- Findingown data
Effect sizes were small for Social Relationships in English.
“Effect sizes were small for Social Relationships (English only).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Over 90% of respondents had an SEM ≤ 3.0 for Ability and Satisfaction.
“Over 90% of respondents had an SEM ≤ 3.0, indicating that the measure provides excellent precision for a large part of the sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
After careful item review, revised Social Function items v2.0 demonstrated substantial improvements when tested on multiple diverse samples varying in health status.
“After a process of careful item review, the revised Social Function items (v2.0) demonstrated substantial improvements when tested on multiple, diverse samples that varied with respect to health status.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Average measures increased monotonically across categories for Ability in Spanish.
“The average measures increased monotonically across categories for Ability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Average measures increased monotonically across categories.
“The average measures increased monotonically across categories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pearson correlations between PROMIS Ability or Satisfaction T-scores and SF-36 and FACT-GP legacy subscales ranged from 0.52 to 0.76.
“Pearson correlation coefficients between PROMIS Ability or Satisfaction T-scores and the SF-36 and FACT-GP legacy subscales ranged from 0.52 to 0.76 (see supplemental Table C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Over 90% of Spanish respondents had an SEM ≤ 3.0.
“Over 90% of respondents had an SEM ≤ 3.0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Seven Social Health item banks are available in English and Spanish through the PROMIS internet-based data collection and management system.
“Seven Social Health item banks are available in English and Spanish through the PROMIS internet-based data collection and management system (www.assessmentcenter.net).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Initial IRT analysis suggested removing two items due to model misfit or gender DIF; these items asked about celebrating holidays and special occasions.
“Results of the initial IRT analysis suggested that two items should be removed due to model misfit or gender DIF (these items asked about celebrating holidays and special occasions).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
EFA for the two Social Function domains identified a large first factor.
“The EFA for the two Social Function domains (abbreviated here as Ability and Satisfaction) identified a large first factor (see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Social Isolation scores were higher (poorer) for the online panel, with an effect size of 0.45.
“Social Isolation scores were higher (poorer) for the online panel (effect size, 0.45).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no evidence of DIF by gender, age, or education in the Spanish analyses.
“There was no evidence of DIF by gender, age or education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no evidence of DIF by gender, age, or education for Ability, Companionship, Emotional Support, Informational Support, and Instrumental Support.
“There was no evidence of DIF by gender, age or education for Ability, Companionship, Emotional Support, Informational Support and Instrumental Support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Correlations for PROMIS Social Support sub-domains were smaller with SF-36 (0.11 to 0.30) and FACT-GP (0.34 to 0.48).
“As expected, correlations for the PROMIS Social Support sub-domains were smaller with the SF-36 (0.11 to 0.30) and the FACT-GP (0.34 to 0.48).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Correlations between PROMIS Social Isolation and SF-36 or FACT-GP were negative and moderate (−0.30 to −0.57).
“Correlations were negative and moderate between PROMIS Social Isolation and the SF-36 or FACT-GP (−0.30 to −0.57).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The v2.0 PROMIS instruments in English and Spanish, with CATs and fixed-length short forms, can be accessed publicly to measure Social Function (Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities) and Social Relationships (Companionship; Emotional, Informational and Instrumental Support; and Social Isolation).
“PROMIS English and Spanish language instruments (v2.0), including computer-adaptive tests and fixed-length short forms, are publicly available for assessment of Social Function (Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities) and Social Relationships (Companionship; Emotional, Informational and Instrumental Support; and Social Isolation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The PROMIS Social Health conceptual model is comprehensive enough to guide development of measures applicable across chronic illnesses.
- Rests on an assumption: Absence of differential item functioning by language is sufficient to establish linguistic equivalence of the English and Spanish measures.
- Rests on an assumption: The convenience samples of English- and Spanish-speaking respondents are adequate for establishing measures applicable across chronic illnesses.
- Rests on an assumption: Qualitative feedback from cancer patients is adequate to support the Social Health domain framework for use across chronic illnesses.
- Premisecitation
Social health has historically been relatively neglected because of a lack of clinical-population measures and disagreement about its definition and measurement.
“social health has historically been a relatively neglected domain due to the lack of measures for clinical populations, as well as disagreement about how best to define and measure it (Hahn, Cella, Bode, & Hanrahan, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hahn, Cella, Bode, & Hanrahan, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
PROMIS adopted the World Health Organization framework that defines physical, mental, and social components of health.
“The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS; www.nihpromis.org) adopted the World Health Organization framework to define three components of health: physical, mental and social (World Health Organization, 1946)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites World Health Organization, 1946
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Those with adequate social support and community integration have better health outcomes than those who are socially isolated.
“individuals who receive appropriate social support and are integrated within their communities experience better health outcomes than those who experience social isolation (Broadhead et al., 1983; Bruhn & Philips, 1984; McDowell, 2006; Mitchell, Billings, & Moos, 1982).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Broadhead et al., 1983
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bruhn & Philips, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McDowell, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
There was good evidence of construct validity in English and Spanish.
“There was also good evidence of construct validity in English and Spanish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Two preliminary v1.0 item banks were calibrated: Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles and Satisfaction with Participation in Discretionary Activities.
“Two preliminary item banks (v1.0) were calibrated (Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles, and Satisfaction with Participation in Discretionary Activities).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hahn, Devellis, et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Having culturally relevant, linguistically equivalent, and psychometrically sound patient-reported measures in languages other than English helps overcome barriers to including underrepresented groups in research and to conducting cross-cultural research.
“Having culturally relevant, linguistically equivalent and psychometrically sound patient-reported measures in languages other than English helps to overcome some common barriers to including underrepresented groups in research and to conducting cross-cultural research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The PROMIS method allows comparability across populations with different illnesses or levels of health because it measures common, generic experiences applicable to people in various contexts or with various diseases.
“Similarly, the PROMIS method allows for comparability across populations with different illnesses or levels of health because it measures common, generic experiences that apply to people in a variety of contexts or with a variety of diseases (Cella, et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cella, et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The English IRT calibrations were used to create a measure for each person who completed English or Spanish items.
“The English IRT calibrations were therefore used to create a measure (score) for each person who completed the English or Spanish language items; descriptive statistics are summarized in Table 3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Cultural equivalence across populations matters especially for social health, since social health inherently involves cultural norms for judging social roles and support.
“Establishing cultural equivalence across populations is particularly important for social health, which inherently includes cultural norms against which social roles and support are assessed (McDowell, 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McDowell, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The English data demonstrated good evidence of criterion validity.
“The English data demonstrated good evidence of criterion validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The Ability and Satisfaction measure provides excellent precision for a large part of the sample.
“Over 90% of respondents had an SEM ≤ 3.0, indicating that the measure provides excellent precision for a large part of the sample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Focus groups and domain-level cognitive interviews were conducted to guide item changes and the creation of new items to address content gaps.
“Four focus groups (n=21 total participants) and domain-level cognitive interviews (n=25) were conducted to inform item modifications and the writing of new items to fill content gaps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Borderline: one of the tests for a substantial claim is unclear. 1
- May combine two claims. 53
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 34
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Borderline on S4 (based): unclear from the text.
Findingnone givenThere was no evidence of DIF by language.
“There was no evidence of DIF by language.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe validation sample comprised 2,208 English-speaking and 644 Spanish-speaking participants and was diverse in gender, age, education, and ethnicity/race.
“Validation testing participants (n=2,208 English; n=644 Spanish) were diverse in terms of gender, age, education and ethnicity/race.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The convenience samples of English- and Spanish-speaking respondents are adequate for establishing measures applicable across chronic illnesses.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter removing those items, EFA identified one factor and CFA had good model fit and no local dependence for Companionship.
“EFA and CFA were then repeated with the reduced item set. EFA identified one factor; CFA had good model fit and no local dependence (see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll Spanish Ability and Satisfaction items fit the IRT models with slopes greater than 2.0 for all but one item and a small mean SEM.
“All Ability and Satisfaction items fit the IRT models with slopes greater than 2.0 for all but one item and a small mean SEM.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe item banks can be administered as a CAT, or users can select a fixed-item short form of 4, 6, or 8 items if internet administration is not feasible.
“The item banks can be administered as a CAT, or users can select a fixed-item short form (4, 6, or 8 items) if internet administration is not feasible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor each domain or sub-domain, all response categories were used, so no category collapsing was needed.
“For each domain or sub-domain, all of the response categories were used; thus, no category collapsing was needed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll Ability and Satisfaction items fit the IRT models, with slopes greater than 2.0 for all but one item and a small mean SEM.
“All Ability and Satisfaction items fit the IRT models, with slopes greater than 2.0 for all but one item and a small mean SEM (see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Social Health Workgroup efforts resulted in 136 items measuring seven aspects of social health, each producing a unidimensional item bank that enables users to select subsets of items or CATs.
“The Social Health Workgroup efforts were reported here, resulting in 136 items measuring seven aspects of social health, each producing a unidimensional item bank that enables users to select subsets of items or CATs from each bank to create efficient measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll Companionship, Emotional Support, Informational Support, Instrumental Support, and Social Isolation items fit the IRT models, with slopes greater than 2.0 for most items.
“All Companionship, Emotional Support, Informational Support, Instrumental Support and Social Isolation items fit the IRT models, with slopes greater than 2.0 for most items.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo items had category inversions in Spanish Satisfaction; the average measure was lower for the highest category (Muchísimo) than for the adjacent category (Mucho).
“Two items had category inversions in Satisfaction; specifically, the average measure was lower for respondents selecting the highest category (Muchísimo) compared to the average measure for the adjacent category (Mucho).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Emotional Support, Informational Support, Instrumental Support, and Social Isolation, EFA identified one factor, and each CFA had good model fit and no local dependence.
“For Emotional Support, Informational Support, Instrumental Support and Social Isolation, one factor was identified by EFA. Each CFA had good model fit and no local dependence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPatient feedback and expert review led to deleting and modifying some items and to dropping the use of a timeframe for the items.
“Patient feedback, along with expert review by the Social Health Workgroup, resulted in the deletion of a few items, modification of a few items, and the decision to drop the use of a timeframe (“past seven days” or “lately”) for the items.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSpanish translations were modified for a small number of items based on cognitive interviews with native Spanish speakers.
“Spanish translations were modified for a small number of items as a result of the cognitive interviews with native Spanish speakers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe formality level of the Spanish word for "close" was lowered by adding an alternative word while keeping the item universally understandable.
“The register (formality) of the word used for “close” (“I feel that I am no longer close to anyone”), had to be lowered by adding an alternative word, while still maintaining a universal understanding of the item.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Satisfaction and Social Isolation, five and two items respectively exhibited some DIF by administration method only.
“For Satisfaction and Social Isolation, five and two items, respectively, exhibited some DIF by administration method only (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe Spanish translation of "leisure activities" was changed from "actividades de ocio" to "actividades de tiempo livre" because several participants did not understand "ocio."
“The translation of “leisure activities” was revised from “actividades de ocio” to “actividades de tiempo livre” since several participants did not understand the word “ocio.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe proportion of respondents with an SEM ≤ 3.0 ranged from 59.0% to 84.3% for the Social Relationships domains.
“The proportion of respondents with an SEM ≤ 3.0 ranged from 59.0% to 84.3%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants in the item testing studies were fairly diverse in gender, age, and education.
“Participants in the item testing studies were fairly diverse in terms of gender, age and education (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor each Spanish Social Function domain, there were no missing data and all response categories were used, so no category collapsing was needed.
“For each Social Function domain, there were no missing data and all of the response categories were used; thus, no category collapsing was needed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe initial EFA for Social Support included 54 items and identified five factors with eigenvalues greater than 1.0.
“The initial EFA for Social Support included a total of 54 items (not shown). EFA identified five factors with eigenvalues greater than 1.0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMissing data ranged from zero to 5% across items.
“Missing data ranged from zero to 5% across items.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly cross-sectional testing has been performed to date, so there are no data on change or responsiveness.
“Only cross-sectional testing has been performed to date, so there are no data on change or responsiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Spanish word for "holidays" ("festividades") was ambiguous and was revised to "dias festivos."
“The Spanish word used for “holidays” (“Do you have someone with whom you can celebrate holidays?”), “festividades”, proved to be ambiguous, so it was revised to “dias festivos.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFocus groups indicated that a negative aspect of Social Relationships (Social Isolation) should be included and supported including different types of Social Support.
“The focus groups highlighted the need to include a negative aspect of Social Relationships (Social Isolation) while corroborating the need to include different kinds of Social Support (e.g., instrumental and emotional).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Spanish CFA for Satisfaction had acceptable model fit, and one item pair exhibited local dependence.
“The CFA for Satisfaction had acceptable model fit; one item pair exhibited local dependence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCognitive interview responses supported a framework in which Social Function consists of Ability to Participate and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities domains, each covering family, friends, work, and leisure.
“Cognitive interview responses supported a framework in which Social Function is comprised of Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities domains, with both including the contexts of family, friends, work and leisure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSeveral items were considered too long and confusing, and some participants read items more than once to understand them.
“Several items were considered too long and confusing, and a few participants reported having to read some items more than once to understand them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter removing nine cross-loading items, EFA identified four factors (Companionship, Emotional Support, Informational Support, Instrumental Support), and all items loaded on their hypothesized factors with loadings from 0.53 to 0.91.
“After removing nine items that cross-loaded on multiple factors, the EFA was repeated. Four factors were identified (Companionship, Emotional Support, Informational Support, Instrumental Support) and all items loaded on their hypothesized factors (item loadings, 0.53 to 0.91; see supplemental Table B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenItems for Social Relationships have been translated into Spanish but not yet tested or evaluated for criterion and construct validity.
“Items for Social Relationships have been translated into Spanish but not yet tested or evaluated for criterion and construct validity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEach CFA for the two Social Function domains had good model fit and no local dependence, with all residual correlations below 0.20.
“Each CFA had good model fit and no local dependence (all residual correlations <0.20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRespondents without comorbidities had higher Ability and Satisfaction scores than those with comorbidities, with English effect sizes 0.94 and 0.85 and Spanish effect sizes 0.79 and 0.50.
“As hypothesized, respondents without comorbidities had higher Ability and Satisfaction scores compared to those with comorbidities (English effect sizes, 0.94 and 0.85, respectively; Spanish effect sizes, 0.79 and 0.50, respectively; Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CFA for Companionship had good model fit (CFI 0.99) and no local dependence.
“The CFA for Companionship had good model fit (CFI, 0.99) and no local dependence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen asked about missing relevant questions, no participants mentioned missing Social Health content; they mentioned content in other PROMIS domains or outside PROMIS.
“When asked what relevant questions were not included, none of the participants mentioned any missing content in Social Health. Instead, they mentioned content covered in other PROMIS domains (e.g., Emotional Health) or currently outside of the PROMIS framework (e.g., patient-provider communication).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNewly developed English Social Relationships versions showed good model fit and discrimination parameters, and good precision for estimating respondent measures.
“Likewise, the newly developed English language versions for Social Relationships showed good model fit and discrimination parameters, and good precision for estimating respondent measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSocial Support scores for the online panel were lower than the clinical samples, with effect sizes from −0.31 to −0.47.
“Interestingly, Social Support scores for the online panel were lower than the clinical samples (effect sizes, −0.31 to −0.47).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo items were considered irrelevant or offensive, and no participants suggested adding new items.
“No items were considered irrelevant or offensive and none of the participants suggested the need to add new items.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe English language samples were mainly non-Hispanic Whites, while the Spanish language sample was Hispanic/Latino by design.
“The English language samples were primarily non-Hispanic Whites; by design, the Spanish language sample was Hispanic/Latino.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Spanish CFA for Ability had good model fit and no local dependence.
“The CFA for Ability had good model fit and no local dependence (see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPROMIS first created two v1.0 Social Function item sets-Ability to Participate and Satisfaction with Participation-and evaluated them with English-speaking general population respondents.
“PROMIS initially developed two sets of Social Function items (Ability to Participate and Satisfaction with Participation, v1.0) and tested them in a general population English-speaking sample (Hahn et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hahn et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe WHO three-component health framework is congruent with the biopsychosocial approach used by many health psychologists.
“This is congruent with the biopsychosocial approach adopted by many health psychologists (Engel, 1977, 1980).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Engel, 1977, 1980
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenSocial health measures will be important in applications using ecologic or determinants-of-health models that emphasize how patients' social environments affect health.
“Measures of social health will play a key role in applications that use ecologic (or determinants of health) models that emphasize how patients’ social environments influence their health”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Institute of Medicine, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Institute of Medicine. Committee on Public Health Strategies to Improve Health, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Whitehead, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The PROMIS Social Health conceptual model is comprehensive enough to guide development of measures applicable across chronic illnesses.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe PROMIS Social Health domain framework v2.0 has two primary sub-components: Social Function and Social Relationships.
“The PROMIS domain framework for Social Health (v2.0) includes two primary sub-components: Social Function and Social Relationships (McDowell, 2006)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McDowell, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ICF uses "participation" to describe social health and functioning and merges activities and participation into a single taxonomy with multiple domains.
“The World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) uses the term “participation” to describe social health and functioning, and merges activities and participation into a single taxonomy with multiple domains, including learning, communication, mobility, self-care, interpersonal relationships and social life (World Health Organization, 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites World Health Organization, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSeven English and Spanish language item banks (v2.0) achieve broad representation of Social Health and are available for public use.
“Nonetheless, we believe that the fruits of the PROMIS efforts are significant, namely, seven English and Spanish language item banks (v2.0) that achieve broad representation of Social Health and are available for public use (www.assessmentcenter.net), specifically: Social Function (Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities) and Social”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCalibrated IRT item banks support CAT and several short forms of different lengths, giving accurate measurement while reducing respondent burden.
“These calibrated item banks are comprised of numerous items that allow for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and development of multiple short forms of varying length that provide accurate measurement with low response burden (Cella, Gershon, Lai, & Choi, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cella, Gershon, Lai, & Choi, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBoth English and Spanish versions revealed highly acceptable psychometric properties providing evidence of reliability and validity.
“Both the English and Spanish versions revealed highly acceptable psychometric properties providing evidence of reliability and validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCAT will provide the most precise estimate; short forms use the same IRT calibrations as CAT but are slightly less precise because they are not targeted to an individual respondent.
“CAT will provide the most precise estimate (score); short forms are based on the same IRT calibrations as a CAT, but will be slightly less precise because they are not targeted to an individual respondent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA standard error of measurement at or below 3.0 is widely viewed as indicating good precision, roughly matching reliability 0.9, and is commonly a CAT stopping criterion.
“An SEM of 3.0 or less is generally considered a good indicator of precision because it is roughly equivalent to a reliability of 0.9 and is often used as a cut point for stopping rules in CAT (Babcock & Weiss, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Babcock & Weiss, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenSocial Health includes item content with universal applicability along with comprehensive coverage of social relationships and function.
“Social Health includes item content with universal applicability along with comprehensive coverage of social relationships and function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInstruments are diverse in their theoretical approach, format, psychometric properties, and targeted use.
“Instruments are also diverse in their theoretical approach, format, psychometric properties and targeted use (Anatchkova & Bjorner, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anatchkova & Bjorner, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThree raters independently examined every interview response.
“All interview responses were independently reviewed by three raters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe Spanish translation used a multi-step forward-backward process.
“The items were translated into Spanish with a multi-step forward-backward process (Eremenco, Cella, & Arnold, 2005; Wild et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Eremenco, Cella, & Arnold, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wild et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe psychometric analysis methods implemented by PROMIS are working, practical tools, and so might be limited in representing the multidimensional space of social health optimally.
“The psychometric analysis methods implemented by PROMIS are working, practical tools, and so might be limited in representing the multidimensional space of social health optimally.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA key distinction between PROMIS and the role functioning item bank is that the latter includes health attribution in each item, which the investigators acknowledge narrowed the construct definition and made items longer and more cumbersome.
“A key distinction between PROMIS and this role functioning item bank is that the latter includes health attribution in each item, e.g., because of health [I] have to stop work. These investigators acknowledge that this decision narrowed the definition of the construct and also made the items longer and more cumbersome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe decision to create Spanish versions was driven by the growing number of Hispanics/Latinos in the U.S., most of whom are Spanish-dominant or bilingual, and by the need for translated measures for global research.
“The decision to create Spanish language versions for self-reported Social Health was driven by the growing number of Hispanics/Latinos (50.5 million) in the U.S., the majority (76%) of whom are Spanish-dominant or bilingual (Pew Hispanic Center, 2011), as well as by the need to have translated measures for use in global research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pew Hispanic Center, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: There is a need for translated patient-reported measures for use in global research.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAccurate Spanish language measures will be useful in helping to unravel whether the Hispanic/Latino epidemiologic paradox is substantiated and whether social support contributes to health outcomes among Hispanics/Latinos.
“In particular, accurate Spanish language measures will be useful in helping to unravel whether the Hispanic/Latino epidemiologic paradox is substantiated, and whether social support contributes to the health outcomes among Hispanics/Latinos that are often found to be comparable to or better than that of other racial/ethnic groups in the U.S despite their low levels of average income and education”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Eschbach, Ostir, Patel, Markides, & Goodwin, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Franzini, Ribble, & Keddie, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPROMIS's primary aim was to create patient-reported outcome measures that are publicly accessible, efficient, and flexible.
“The main goal of PROMIS was to develop a set of publicly available, efficient and flexible measurements of patient-reported outcomes (Cella et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cella et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDuring the first PROMIS general population test, all 112 items were answered by 956 people.
“In initial PROMIS testing with a general population sample, 956 respondents answered all 112 items (Hahn, Devellis, et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hahn, Devellis, et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSemi-structured cognitive interviews were conducted with 21 English-speaking adults with various cancer diagnoses.
“Semi-structured cognitive interviews were conducted on the revised pool of items with 21 English-speaking adults with a variety of cancer diagnoses (mean age, 56 years; 57% Female; 52% White and 33% African-American).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataInitial testing of PROMIS Social Function items showed that certain items required refinement and that later testing needed clinical samples to assess the conceptual models and create measures usable across chronic illnesses.
“Results showed that some item refinement was necessary, and that clinical samples should be included in future testing to evaluate our conceptual models and produce measures for use across chronic illnesses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hahn et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationPsychometric analyses followed PROMIS guidelines and were conducted separately by language.
“Analyses followed the PROMIS guidelines (Reeve et al., 2007), separately by language.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reeve et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBy using a comprehensive translation methodology and finding no DIF by language, the Spanish language versions are culturally responsive.
“By using a comprehensive translation methodology and in finding no DIF by language, the Spanish language versions are culturally responsive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAlthough convenience sampling was used, purposeful enrollment of diverse samples helped to better understand the item bank properties.
“Although convenience sampling was used, purposeful enrollment of diverse samples helped to better understand the item bank properties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe study expanded previous work by developing Social Relationships item banks in addition to Social Function, translating all items, and testing them in English- and Spanish-speaking clinical populations.
“The study presented in this article significantly expanded our previous work (Hahn, Devellis, et al., 2010) by developing item banks of Social Relationships in addition to Social Function, comprehensively translating all items, and testing them in English- and Spanish-speaking clinical populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hahn, Devellis, et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA recent review identified eight contemporary participation measures linked to the ICF, but these instruments are not equivalent because items represent different aspects of a dimension even when linked to a single ICF code.
“A recent review identified eight contemporary participation measures with linkages to the ICF, yet these instruments are not equivalent because, even when linked to a single ICF code, items represent different aspects of a dimension (Magasi & Post, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Magasi & Post, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningSocial Relationships items could not be added to the Spanish testing because of respondent burden.
“Due to respondent burden, it was not possible to add the Social Relationships items.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOther researchers applied the PROMIS IRT-based item banking approach to develop a generic role functioning item bank in English.
“Other researchers applied the PROMIS IRT-based item banking approach to develop a generic role functioning item bank in English (Anatchkova, Ware, & Bjorner, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anatchkova, Ware, & Bjorner, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmong minority groups, Latinos/Hispanics are growing fastest and are often underserved in health care and left out of research.
“who constitute the fastest growing group among minority populations that are often underserved in health care settings and excluded from research studies (Garber & Arnold, 2006; Yancey, Ortega, & Kumanyika, 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Garber & Arnold, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yancey, Ortega, & Kumanyika, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe use of common indicators of Social Health will facilitate measurement consistency and comparison across studies and populations, and should enhance understanding of how these variables relate to other aspects of health.
“The use of common indicators of Social Health will facilitate measurement consistency and comparison across studies and populations, and should enhance understanding of how these variables relate to other aspects of health.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe availability of these item banks represents a substantial resource for investigators and clinicians who wish to accurately assess social function and social relationships using CATs and short form measures.
“Collectively, the availability of these item banks represents a substantial resource that is now available to investigators and clinicians who wish to accurately assess social function and social relationships using CATs and short form measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThese item banks have undergone extensive and rigorous qualitative and psychometric assessment, and demonstrate strong properties.
“These item banks have undergone extensive and rigorous qualitative and psychometric assessment, and demonstrate strong properties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The PROMIS Social Health conceptual model is comprehensive enough to guide development of measures applicable across chronic illnesses.
“To develop psychometrically sound, culturally relevant and linguistically equivalent English and Spanish self-report measures of social health guided by a comprehensive conceptual model and applicable across chronic illnesses.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The English online panel and clinical samples are comparable enough to pool for psychometric analyses.
“Data from the English online panel and clinical samples were pooled for analysis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Absence of differential item functioning by language is sufficient to establish linguistic equivalence of the English and Spanish measures.
“There was no DIF by language, and good evidence of criterion and construct validity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The convenience samples of English- and Spanish-speaking respondents are adequate for establishing measures applicable across chronic illnesses.
“PROMIS Social Function and Social Relationships items (v2.0) were administered to several large, diverse, convenience samples manifesting varied clinical problems associated with functional limitation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Qualitative feedback from cancer patients is adequate to support the Social Health domain framework for use across chronic illnesses.
“Focus groups and cognitive interviews were conducted with adults receiving care for cancer in the Chicago metropolitan area (at a private hospital and a safety net county hospital).”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a need for translated patient-reported measures for use in global research.
“as well as by the need to have translated measures for use in global research.”
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788 · see citing works
The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine
Engel, G. L. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.847460 · Cited by 12,887 · see citing works
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x · Cited by 5,521 · see citing works
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 · Cited by 5,128 · see citing works
Self-citationThe clinical application of the biopsychosocial model
ENGEL, G. L. (1980) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.137.5.535 · Cited by 3,345 · see citing works
ESTIMATION OF LATENT ABILITY USING A RESPONSE PATTERN OF GRADED SCORES1
Samejima, F. (1968) · ETS Research Bulletin Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1968.tb00153.x · Cited by 2,605 · see citing works
Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory
van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6 · Cited by 2,331 · see citing works
Development of a short acculturation scale for hispanics
Marin, G., Sabogal, F., Marin, B. V., Otero-Sabogal, R., & Perez-Stable, E. J. (1987) · Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1177/07399863870092005 · Cited by 2,299 · see citing works
Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria
Lohr, K. N. (2002) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1023/a:1015291021312 · Cited by 2,281 · see citing works
McDowell, I. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195165678.001.0001 · Cited by 2,095 · see citing works
Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Revicki, D. A., Spritzer, K. L., & Cella, D. (2009) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9 · Cited by 1,957 · see citing works
Self-citationPsychometric Evaluation and Calibration of Health-Related Quality of Life Item Banks
Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjørner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., Thissen, D., Revicki, D. A., Weiss, D. J., Hambleton, R. K., et al. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04 · Cited by 1,491 · see citing works
Self-citationEffective recruitment and retention of minority research participants.
Yancey, A., Ortega, A., & Kumanyika, S. (2006) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102113 · Cited by 1,247 · see citing works
THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVIDENCE FOR A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOCIAL SUPPORT AND HEALTH
Broadhead, W. E., Kaplan, B. H., James, S. A., Wagner, E. H., Schoenbach, V. J., GRIMSON, R. C., Heyden, S., Tibblin, G., & Gehlbach, S. H. (1983) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113575 · Cited by 917 · see citing works
Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v039.i08 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D. F., & Arnold, B. J. (2005) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278705275342 · Cited by 754 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding the Hispanic paradox.
Franzini, L., Ribble, J. C., & Keddie, A. M. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Evaluation of Item Candidates: The PROMIS Qualitative Item Review
DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e2 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Likelihood-Based Item-Fit Indices for Dichotomous Item Response Theory Models
Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2000) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/01466216000241003 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
The Future of the public's health in the 21st century
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-5935 · Cited by 673 · see citing works
Cella, D. F., Gershon, R. C., Lai, J., & Choi, S. W. (2007) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9204-6 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Self-citationBrucker, P. S., Yost, K., Cashy, J., Webster, K., & Cella, D. (2005) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278705275341 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Self-citationRose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Becker, J., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.025 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Neighborhood Context and Mortality Among Older Mexican Americans: Is There a Barrio Advantage?
Eschbach, K., Ostir, G. V., Patel, K. V., Markides, K. S., & Goodwin, J. S. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.10.1807 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Yost, K. J., & Eton, D. T. (2005) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278705275340 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Pilkonis, P. A., Hahn, E. A., DeVellis, R. F., Bode, R. K., Garcia, S. F., Castel, L. D., Eisen, S. V., Bosworth, H. B., Heinemann, A. W., Rothrock, N. E., et al. (2010) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9654-0 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial support and well-being: Implications for prevention programs
Mitchell, R. E., Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1982) · The Journal of Primary Prevention · doi:10.1007/bf01324668 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Measuring social support: A synthesis of current approaches
Bruhn, J. G., & Philips, B. U. (1984) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf00845384 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Magasi, S. R., & Post, M. W. M. (2010) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.011 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Content validity in the PROMIS social-health domain: a qualitative analysis of focus-group data
Castel, L. D., Williams, K. A., Bosworth, H. B., Eisen, S. V., Hahn, E. A., Irwin, D. E., Kelly, M. A. R., Morse, J., Stover, A. M., DeWalt, D. A., et al. (2008) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9352-3 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasuring Social Well-Being in People with Chronic Illness
Hahn, E. A., Cella, D. F., Bode, R. K., & Hanrahan, R. T. (2009) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9484-z · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationBabcock, B., & Weiss, D. J. (2012) · Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing · doi:10.7333/1212-0101001 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Health and role functioning: the use of focus groups in the development of an item bank
Anatchkova, M., & Bjørner, J. B. (2010) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9570-3 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Babcock, B., & Weiss, D. J. (2012) · Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing · doi:10.7333/jcat.v1i1.16 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Promoting the Participation of Minorities in Research
Garber, M., & Arnold, R. M. (2006) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265160600686331 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Assessing the factor structure of a role functioning item bank
Anatchkova, M., Ware, J. E., & Bjørner, J. B. (2010) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9807-1 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social media use and perceived social isolation among young adults in the U.S
Primack, B. A., Shensa, A., Sidani, J. E., Whaite, E. O., Lin, L. Y., Rosen, D., Colditz, J. B., Radovic, A., & Miller, E. (2017) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.010 · Cited by 889 · see citing works
PROMIS®-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores
Hays, R. D., Spritzer, K. L., Schalet, B. D., & Cella, D. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1842-3 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
Self-citationPROMIS® Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measures of Seven Health Domains
Cella, D., Choi, S. W., Condon, D. M., Schalet, B., Hays, R. D., Rothrock, N. E., Yount, S., Cook, K. F., Gershon, R. C., Amtmann, D., et al. (2019) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.004 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Self-citationFruehwirth, J. C., Biswas, S., & Perreira, K. M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247999 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
McDermott, M. M., Spring, B., Berger, J. S., Treat-Jacobson, D., Conte, M. S., Creager, M. A., Criqui, M. H., Ferrucci, L., Gornik, H. L., Guralnik, J. M., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.3275 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Self-citationMeshi, D., & Ellithorpe, M. E. (2021) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106949 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Problematic Social Media Use and Perceived Social Isolation in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study
Meshi, D., Cotten, S. R., & Bender, A. R. (2020) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000502577 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
The Impact of Social Isolation on Pain Interference: A Longitudinal Study
Karayannis, N. V., Baumann, I., Sturgeon, J. A., Melloh, M., & Mackey, S. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kay017 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Social Media Use and Perceived Emotional Support Among US Young Adults
Shensa, A. S., Sidani, J. E., Lin, L. Y., Bowman, N. D., & Primack, B. A. (2015) · Journal of Community Health · doi:10.1007/s10900-015-0128-8 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Hahn, E. A., Beaumont, J. L., Pilkonis, P. A., Garcia, S. F., Magasi, S. R., DeWalt, D. A., & Cella, D. F. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.034 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationShensa, A., Sidani, J. E., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Switzer, G. E., Primack, B. A., & Choukas-Bradley, S. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.092 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Campo, R. A., Bluth, K., Santacroce, S. J., Knapik, S., Tan, J., Gold, S., Philips, K., Gaylord, S., & Asher, G. N. (2017) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3586-y · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Bekelman, J. E., Lu, H. L., Pugh, S. L., Baker, K., Berg, C. D., de González, A. B., Braunstein, L. Z., Bosch, W. R., Chauhan, C., Ellenberg, S. S., et al. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025556 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationSegawa, E., Schalet, B. D., & Cella, D. F. (2019) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02312-8 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationColleagues Meeting to Promote and Sustain Satisfaction (COMPASS) Groups for Physician Well-Being
West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., Satele, D. V., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2021) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.02.028 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Effect of Gender-affirming Facial Feminization Surgery on Psychosocial Outcomes
Caprini, R. M., Oberoi, M. K., Dejam, D., Chan, C. H., Potemra, H. M. K., Morgan, K. B. J., Weimer, A. K., Litwin, M. S., Mendelsohn, A. H., & Lee, J. C. (2022) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000005472 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Fischer, F. H., Sidey-Gibbons, C. J., Coste, J., Valderas, J. M., Rose, M., & Leplège, A. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1785-8 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Terwee, C. B., Crins, M. H. P., Boers, M., de Vet, H. C. W., & Roorda, L. D. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1995-0 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Carlozzi, N. E., Kratz, A. L., Sander, A. M., Chiaravalloti, N. D., Brickell, T. A., Lange, R. T., Hahn, E. A., Austin, A. M., Miner, J. A., & Tulsky, D. S. (2014) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.021 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial isolation and social connectedness among young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review
Fox, R. S., Armstrong, G. E., Gaumond, J. S., Vigoureux, T. F. D., Miller, C. H., Sanford, S. D., Salsman, J. M., Katsanis, E., Badger, T. A., Reed, D. R., et al. (2023) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.34934 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Holmes, L. G., Zampella, C., Clements, C. C., McCleery, J. P., Maddox, B. B., Parish‐Morris, J., Udhnani, M. D., Schultz, R. T., & Miller, J. S. (2020) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2275 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Macià, D., Cattaneo, G., Sánchez, J. S., Tormos, J. M., Pascual‐Leone, Á., & Bartrés‐Faz, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627547 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Predicting depression and anxiety among adults with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Wang, K., Manning, R. B., Bogart, K. R., Adler, J. M., Nario‐Redmond, M. R., Ostrove, J. M., & Lowe, S. R. (2022) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/rep0000434 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Sewall, C. J. R., Goldstein, T. R., Wright, A. G. C., & Rosen, D. (2022) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026221078309 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Schalet, B. D., Lim, S., Cella, D. F., & Choi, S. W. (2021) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-021-09776-z · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationBartley, E. J., Palit, S., Fillingim, R. B., & Robinson, M. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01932 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Fruehwirth, J. C., Gorman, B. L., & Perreira, K. M. (2021) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.06.016 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Quin, N., Lee, J. J., Pinnington, D. M., Newman, L., Manber, R., & Bei, B. (2022) · SLEEP · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsab293 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Pilot study of a sleep health promotion program for college students
Levenson, J. C., Miller, E. P., Hafer, B., Reidell, M. F., Buysse, D. J., & Franzen, P. L. (2016) · Sleep Health · doi:10.1016/j.sleh.2016.03.006 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Stress, social support and their relationship to depression and anxiety among Latina immigrant women
Ryan, D. E., Tornberg-Belanger, S. N., Perez, G., Maurer, S., Price, C. J., Rao, D., Chan, K. C. G., & Ornelas, I. J. (2021) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110588 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Mosher, C. E., Seçinti, E., Johns, S. A., O’Neil, B. H., Helft, P. R., Shahda, S., Jalal, S. I., & Champion, V. L. (2017) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1620-7 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Adams, R. N., Mosher, C. E., Rand, K. L., Hirsh, A. T., Monahan, P. O., Abonour, R., & Kroenke, K. (2017) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1518-4 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Clarke, P. J., Twardzik, E., Meade, M. A., Peterson, M. D., & Tate, D. G. (2019) · Journal of Aging and Health · doi:10.1177/0898264318822238 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Development of an item bank for the EORTC Role Functioning Computer Adaptive Test (EORTC RF-CAT)
on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group, Gamper, E., Petersen, M. A., Aaronson, N. K., Costantini, A., Giesinger, J. M., Holzner, B., Kemmler, G., Oberguggenberger, A., Singer, S., et al. (2016) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0475-x · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Carlozzi, N. E., Hanks, R. A., Lange, R. T., Brickell, T. A., Ianni, P. A., Miner, J. A., French, L. M., Kallen, M. A., & Sander, A. M. (2018) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.021 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Social Isolation Associated with Future Health Care Utilization
Mosen, D. M., Banegas, M. P., Tucker‐Seeley, R. D., Keast, E. M., Hu, W., Ertz-Berger, B. L., & Brooks, N. B. (2020) · Population Health Management · doi:10.1089/pop.2020.0106 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Finucane, M. L., Beckman, R., Ghosh‐Dastidar, M., Dubowitz, T., Collins, R. L., & Troxel, W. (2021) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104264 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Psychological wellness of internal medicine hospitalists during the COVID-19 pandemic
Dugani, S. B., Geyer, H. L., Maniaci, M. J., Fischer, K. M., Croghan, I. T., & Burton, M. C. (2020) · Hospital Practice · doi:10.1080/21548331.2020.1832792 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Zhaoyang, R., Sliwinski, M. J., Martire, L. M., Katz, M. J., & Scott, S. (2021) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbab019 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Health and Functional Literacy in Physical Rehabilitation Patients
Hahn, E. A., Magasi, S. R., Carlozzi, N. E., Tulsky, D. S., Wong, A., Garcia, S. F., Lai, J., Hammel, J. M., Mišković, A., Jerousek, S., et al. (2017) · HLRP Health Literacy Research and Practice · doi:10.3928/24748307-20170427-02 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationSegrin, C. G., Badger, T. A., & Sikorskii, A. E. (2018) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2018.1520778 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Graboyes, E. M., Hill, E. G., Marsh, C. H., Maurer, S. N., Day, T. A., & Sterba, K. R. (2019) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/0194599819835534 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Carlozzi, N. E., Ianni, P. A., Lange, R. T., Brickell, T. A., Kallen, M. A., Hahn, E. A., French, L. M., Cella, D. F., Miner, J. A., & Tulsky, D. S. (2018) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.026 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnston, K. L., Lawrence, S. M., Dodds, N. E., Yu, L., Daley, D. C., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2015) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1131-3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Yoga for warriors: An intervention for veterans with comorbid chronic pain and PTSD.
Chopin, S. M., Sheerin, C. M., & Meyer, B. L. (2020) · Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy · doi:10.1037/tra0000649 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Social isolation and well-being in veterans with mental illness
Grenawalt, T., Lu, J.-F., Hamner, K., Gill, C. C., & Umucu, E. (2022) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638237.2021.2022625 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Patient reported outcomes can improve performance status assessment: a pilot study
Broderick, J. E., May, M., Schwartz, J. E., Li, M., Mejia, A., Nocera, L. P., Kolatkar, A. R., Ueno, N. T., Yennurajalingam, S., Lee, J. S. H., et al. (2019) · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s41687-019-0136-z · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Association Between Resilience and Psychological Morbidity in Parents of Critically Ill Children*
Rothschild, C. B., Rychlik, K. L., Goodman, D. M., Charleston, E., Brown, M. L., Michelson, K. N., & for the Navigate Study Investigators (2020) · Pediatric Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/pcc.0000000000002237 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Kertesz, S. G., DeRussy, A. J., Kim, Y. I., Hoge, A. E., Austin, E. L., Gordon, A. J., Gelberg, L., Gabrielian, S. E., Riggs, K. R., Blosnich, J. R., et al. (2021) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001548 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Heinemann, A. W., Kisala, P. A., Hahn, E. A., & Tulsky, D. S. (2015) · Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine · doi:10.1179/2045772315y.0000000028 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationGarcia, S. F., Hahn, E. A., Magasi, S. R., Lai, J., Semik, P. E., Hammel, J. M., & Heinemann, A. W. (2014) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.019 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationKent, E. E., Mollica, M. A., Dionne-Odom, J. N., Ferrer, R. A., Jensen, R. E., Ornstein, K. A., & Smith, A. W. (2020) · Palliative & Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951520000036 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Riggs, K. R., Hoge, A. E., DeRussy, A. J., Montgomery, A. E., Holmes, S. K., Austin, E. L., Pollio, D. E., Kim, Y.-I., Varley, A. L., Gelberg, L., et al. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1190 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Graboyes, E. M., Maurer, S. N., Park, Y., Marsh, C. H., McElligott, J. T., Day, T. A., Hornig, J. D., & Sterba, K. R. (2020) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5399 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Steinman, L. E., Parrish, A. T., Mayotte, C., Bravo-Acevedo, P., Torres, E., Markova, M., Boddie, M., Lachenmayr, S., Montoya, C. N., Parker, L., et al. (2020) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2020.10.005 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The effect of social media use on mental health of college students during the pandemic
Fruehwirth, J. C., Weng, A. X., & Perreira, K. M. (2024) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4871 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Dong, W., Zhu, J., Dong, Y., Zhao, Y., & Wang, N. (2025) · Journal of Transport & Health · doi:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102204 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Implementation of a Stress Intervention with Latino Immigrants in a Non-traditional Migration City
Jacquez, F., Vaughn, L. M., & Suarez-Cano, G. (2018) · Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health · doi:10.1007/s10903-018-0732-7 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Seçinti, E., Rand, K. L., Johns, S. A., O’Neil, B. H., Helft, P. R., Shahda, S., Jalal, S. I., & Mosher, C. E. (2018) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4467-8 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Umucu, E., Reyes, A., Carrola, P. A., Mangadu, T., Lee, B., Brooks, J., Fortuna, K. L., Villegas, D., Chiu, C.-Y., & Valencia, C. (2020) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-020-02642-y · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Cai, T., Huang, Q., & Yuan, C. (2021) · BMC Women s Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01307-3 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Li, X., Hathaway, C. A., Small, B. J., Tometich, D. B., Gudenkauf, L. M., Hoogland, A. I., Fox, R. S., Victorson, D. E., Salsman, J. M., Gonzalez, B. D., et al. (2024) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35508 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Jeppesen, P. B., Chen, K. S., Murphy, R., Shahraz, S., & Goodwin, B. B. (2021) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1002/jpen.2248 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Sikorskii, A. E., Victorson, D. E., O'Connor, P., Hankin, V. M., Safikhani, A., Crane, T. E., Badger, T. A., & Wyatt, G. K. (2018) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4825 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Oddsson, L., Bisson, T. A., Cohen, H. S., Jacobs, L., Khoshnoodi, M. A., Kung, D. H., Lipsitz, L. A., Manor, B. D., McCracken, P., Rumsey, Y., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2020.592751 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Heinemann, A. W., Lai, J., Wong, A., Dashner, J. L., Magasi, S. R., Hahn, E. A., Carlozzi, N. E., Tulsky, D. S., Jerousek, S., Semik, P. E., et al. (2016) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1314-6 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationFischer, F. H., Wahl, I., Nolte, S., Liegl, G., Brähler, E., Löwe, B., & Rose, M. (2016) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.1530 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A Mixed Methods Approach to the Analysis of Bias in Cross-cultural Studies
Benítez, I., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Padilla, J. (2019) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124119852390 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Doorley, J. D., Mace, R. A., Popok, P., Grunberg, V. A., Ragnhildstveit, A., & Vranceanu, A. (2021) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnab135 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Bei, B., Pinnington, D. M., Shen, L., Blumfield, M., Drummond, S. P. A., Newman, L. K., & Manber, R. (2019) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2390-8 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Jones, A. L., Gordon, A. J., Gabrielian, S. E., Montgomery, A. E., Blosnich, J. R., Varley, A. L., DeRussy, A. J., Austin, E. L., Hoge, A. E., Kim, Y. I., et al. (2021) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001547 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Perry, L. M., Morken, V., Peipert, J. D., Yanez, B. R., Garcia, S. F., Barnard, C., Hirschhorn, L. R., Linder, J. A., Jordan, N., Ackermann, R. T., et al. (2022) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/38461 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationCook, K. F., Kallen, M. A., Buckenmaier, C. C., Flynn, D. M., Hanling, S. R., Collins, T. S., Joltes, K. H., Kwon, K., Medina, S., Nahavandi, P., et al. (2017) · Military Medicine · doi:10.7205/milmed-d-16-00285 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Magasi, S. R., Wong, A., Mišković, A., Tulsky, D. S., & Heinemann, A. W. (2017) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.030 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Graboyes, E. M., Hill, E. G., Marsh, C. H., Maurer, S. N., Day, T. A., Hornig, J. D., Lentsch, E. J., Neskey, D. M., Skoner, J. M., & Sterba, K. R. (2020) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/0194599819898861 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Food insecurity during COVID ‐19: An Australian university experience
Bennett, C., Christian, M. S., Phan, S., McCabe, M., Cornish, K. M., & Kleve, S. (2022) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.13962 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Metastatic breast cancer patients’ expectations and priorities for symptom improvement
Tometich, D. B., Mosher, C. E., Hirsh, A. T., Rand, K. L., Johns, S. A., Matthias, M. S., Outcalt, S. D., Schneider, B. P., Mina, L. A., Storniolo, A. M., et al. (2018) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4244-8 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Mace, R. A., Gates, M. V., Popok, P., Kulich, R. J., Quiroz, Y. T., & Vranceanu, A. (2020) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnaa179 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Horvath, K. J., MacLehose, R. F., Martinka, A., DeWitt, J., Hightow‐Weidman, L., Sullivan, P. S., & Amico, K. R. (2018) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/11502 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Jensen, C. E., Vohra, S., Nyrop, K. A., Deal, A. M., Muss, H. B., Lichtman, E. I., Rubinstein, S. M., Wood, W. A., Mangieri, N. J., Jamison, L. S., et al. (2021) · Journal of Geriatric Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2021.08.004 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Schoenbeck, K. L., Atallah, E. L., Lin, L., Weinfurt, K. P., Cortes, J. E., Deininger, M. W., Kota, V. K., Larson, R. A., Mauro, M. J., Oehler, V. G., et al. (2021) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djab184 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Berardi, G., Frey‐Law, L., Sluka, K. A., Bayman, E. O., Coffey, C. S., Ecklund, D. J., Vance, C. G. T., Dailey, D. L., Burns, J. W., Buvanendran, A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.849214 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Weiner, L. S., Nagel, S., Su, H.-C. I., Hurst, S., Levy, S. S., Arredondo, E. M., Hekler, E. B., & Hartman, S. J. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-022-00381-8 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Mace, R. A., Gates, M. V., Bullard, B., Lester, E. G., Silverman, I. H., Quiroz, Y. T., & Vranceanu, A. (2020) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnaa084 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Cohen, J. R., Adams, Z. W., Menon, S. V., Youngstrom, E. A., Bunnell, B. E., Acierno, R. E., Ruggiero, K. J., & Danielson, C. K. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.034 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
My Healthy Brain: a multimodal lifestyle program to promote brain health
Mace, R. A., Greenberg, J., Stauder, M. J., Reynolds, G., & Vranceanu, A. (2021) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2021.1904828 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
The COVID-19 pandemic and weight management: Effective behaviors and pandemic-specific risk factors
Borgatti, A. C., Schneider-Worthington, C. R., Stager, L., Krantz, O., Davis, A., Blevins, M., Howell, C., & Dutton, G. (2021) · Obesity Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.orcp.2021.06.007 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Krafft, J., Twohig, M. P., & Levin, M. E. (2020) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-020-10114-3 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Barnes, S. M., Borges, L. M., Smith, G. P., Walser, R. D., Forster, J. E., & Bahraini, N. H. (2021) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.02.003 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Murray, C. B., Li, R., Kashikar‐Zuck, S., Zhou, C., & Palermo, T. M. (2024) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003308 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
McGuire, A., Elmore, C., Szabo, Y. Z., Kurz, A. S., Mendoza, C., Umucu, E., & Creech, S. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0281575 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Fruehwirth, J. C., Huang, L., Tompson, C. E., & Perreira, K. M. (2024) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.09.026 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Polite, B. N., Cipriano-Steffens, T., Liao, C., Miller, E. L., Arndt, N., & Hahn, E. A. (2019) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.31991 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationCai, T., Huang, Q., & Yuan, C. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048515 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Segrin, C. G., Badger, T. A., & Sikorskii, A. E. (2019) · Journal of Transcultural Nursing · doi:10.1177/1043659619896824 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Poort, H., Ryan, A. K., MacDougall, K., Malinowski, P. K., MacDonald, A., Markin, Z., Pirl, W. F., Greer, J. A., & Fasciano, K. M. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25069 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
McCumber, M. D., Cain, D. N., LeGrand, S., Mayer, K. H., Murphy, D. A., Psioda, M. A., Seña, A. C., Starks, T. J., & Hudgens, M. G. (2018) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/11207 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Poku, O. B., Foster, A. H., Entaile, P., Misra, S., Mehta, H. T., Rampa, S., Goodman, M. S., Arscott‐Mills, T., Eschliman, E. L., Jackson, V., et al. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04676-6 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Carlozzi, N. E., Hahn, E. A., Goodnight, S. M., Kratz, A. L., Paulsen, J. S., Stout, J. C., Frank, S., Miner, J. A., Cella, D. F., Gershon, R. C., et al. (2017) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000479 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationDresden, S. M., Lo, A. X., Lindquist, L. A., Kocherginsky, M., Post, L. A., French, D. D., Gray, E., & Heinemann, A. W. (2020) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2020.106125 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hahn, E. A., PROMIS Cooperative Group, DeWalt, D. A., Bode, R. K., Garcia, S. F., DeVellis, R. F., Correia, H., & Cella, D.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Venue
- Health Psychology
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 490-499
- ISSN
- 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7810
- PMC
- PMC4159098
- OpenAlex
- W2075006538
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 11.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (U01AR52177, U01AR52186, U01AR52181, U01AR52155, U01AR52158, U01AR52170, U01AR52171)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- social health, PROMIS, patient-reported outcomes, Spanish translation, cross-cultural validation, social function, interpersonal relationships, social isolation, social support, chronic disease, health determinants, computerized adaptive testing, short form, item response theory
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Qualitative Research, Cultural Competency, Young Adult, Self Report, Social Determinants of Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review