Cited by 51Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Comparing Engage with PST in Late-Life Major Depression: A Preliminary Report

Open access
Alexopoulos, George S., Raue, Patrick J., Kiosses, Dimitris N., Seirup, Joanna K., Banerjee, Samprit, Arean, Patricia A.·2015·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The complexity of psychotherapies has been a barrier to community implementation. We used the Research Domain Criteria consensus as a guide to develop Engage, a streamlined, neurobiology-based psychotherapy for late-life depression that may match the skill set of practicing clinicians. This proof of concept study tested the hypotheses that Engage is bioequivalent to Problem Solving Therapy (PST) in reducing depressive symptoms, inducing remission, and ameliorating disability.Methods Engage assumes that abnormal function of the positive valence systems fuels depression and uses "reward exposure" (engagement in meaningful, rewarding activities) as its principal intervention. Negativity bias, apathy, and emotional dysregulation are expressions of abnormalities in the negative valence, arousal and regulatory, and cognitive control systems, respectively. Engage targets each of them with simple interventions only if they interfere with reward exposure. We treated openly, with 9 weekly sessions of Engage, 39 older adults with unipolar major depression. We compared their course of depression (HAM-D), remission rate (HAM-D<10), and disability (WHODAS) with those of a historical comparison group (N = 97) treated with 9 weekly sessions of PST.Results Community social workers and research therapists required one third as much training time in Engage as in PST. Engage was non-inferior to PST in reducing HAM-D and WHODAS. Remission rates for Engage at 6 and 9 weeks were 18.2% and 41.1%, respectively. The corresponding figures for PST were 13.7% and 35.0%, respectively.Conclusion These initial observations suggest that Engage has comparable efficacy with PST in reducing depressive symptoms and disability and warrants a randomized controlled trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.06.008

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial studies suggest that ENGAGE is non-inferior to problem solving therapy.

    “Initial studies suggest that ENGAGE can be taught to community based therapists, is non-inferior to problem solving therapy171, and engages its behavioral targets172,173.”

    From Mechanisms and treatment of late-life depression (2019) · cites this paper as [171]

  • Initial studies suggest that ENGAGE can be taught to community based therapists.

    “Initial studies suggest that ENGAGE can be taught to community based therapists, is non-inferior to problem solving therapy171, and engages its behavioral targets172,173.”

    From Mechanisms and treatment of late-life depression (2019) · cites this paper as [171]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [26]First MB Spitzer RL Williams JBW Gibbon M Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV - patient version (SCID-P) Washington American Psychiatric Press 1995
  2. [30]Epping-Jordan JA Ustun TB The WHODAS-II: leveling the playing field for all disorders WHO Mental Health Bulletin 2000 6 5 6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexopoulos, G. S., Raue, P. J., Kiosses, D. N., Seirup, J. K., Banerjee, S., & Arean, P. A.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Alexopoulos, George S.
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
506-513
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058408506
Cited by
51
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Sanchez Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
problem-solving therapy, geriatric depression, older adults, positive valence systems, negativity bias, apathy, emotional dysregulation, depressive symptom reduction, remission, disability, community implementation, therapist training
MeSH terms
Late Onset Disorders, Affective Symptoms, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Patient Participation, Problem Solving, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Remission Induction, Reward, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Mental Competency, Treatment Outcome, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Apathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review