Cited by 114Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Psychosocial telephone intervention for dementia caregivers: A randomized, controlled trial

Open access
Tremont, Geoffrey, Davis, Jennifer D., Papandonatos, George D., Ott, Brian R., Fortinsky, Richard H., Gozalo, Pedro, Yue, Mun Sang, Bryant, Kimberly +2 more·2015·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Background: Identifying effective and accessible interventions for dementia caregivers is critical as dementia prevalence increases. Objective: Examine the effects of a telephone‐based intervention on caregiver well‐being. Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Two hundred and fifty distressed, family, dementia caregivers. Intervention: Caregivers randomized to receive 16 telephone contacts over 6 months of either the Family Intervention: Telephone Tracking—Caregiver (FITT‐C) or Telephone Support (TS). Outcome: Primary outcome variables were family caregivers' depressive symptoms, burden, and reactions to care recipients' behavior problems at 6 months. Results: The FITT‐C intervention resulted in significantly improved caregiver depressive symptoms (P = .003; 27% net improvement) and less severe reactions to care‐recipient depressive behaviors (P = .009; 29% net improvement) compared with the control condition (TS). Conclusion: An entirely telephone‐based intervention improves caregivers' depressive symptoms and reactions to behavior problems in the care recipient and is comparable with reported results of face‐to‐face interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.1752

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tremont, G., Davis, J. D., Papandonatos, G. D., Ott, B. R., Fortinsky, R. H., Gozalo, P., Yue, M. S., Bryant, K., Grover, C., & Bishop, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Rhode Island Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Tremont, Geoffrey
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-26
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
541-548
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2003963087
Cited by
114
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (NR010559)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
dementia caregivers, telephone-delivered intervention
MeSH terms
Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Dementia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review