Cited by 88Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Systematic review of services providing information and/or advice to people with dementia and/or their caregivers

Corbett, Anne, Stevens, Jennifer, Aarsland, Dag, Day, Sarah, Moniz‐Cook, Esme, Woods, Robert, Brooker, Dawn, Ballard, Clive·2012·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information is a key part of service provision to people with dementia and their carers, but there is no systematic review of the evidence. This study aimed to determine whether information services confer significant benefit for quality of life, neuropsychiatric symptoms and carer burden. METHOD: A systematic review of intervention studies in people with dementia was carried out, focussing predominantly on the provision of information and/or advice. RESULTS: Thirteen randomised controlled trials were identified. Two of the three studies measuring quality of life indicated benefit. Significant benefits were also evident for neuropsychiatric symptoms (points difference, -1.48; confidence interval, -2.11 to 0.86), but not carer burden. Most interventions included other key elements such as skills training, telephone support and direct help to navigate the medical and care system. CONCLUSION: There is some support for the value of information services, but studies are needed to determine the specific elements that are effective.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.2762

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corbett, A., Stevens, J., Aarsland, D., Day, S., Moniz‐Cook, E., Woods, R., Brooker, D., & Ballard, C.
Affiliations
  • Alzheimer's Society (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Stavanger University Hospital (NO)
  • Hull York Medical School (Hull University) Institute of Rehabilitation Hull UK
  • Dementia Services Development Centre Wales Bangor University Bangor UK
  • University of Worcester (GB)
Corresponding author
Ballard, Clive
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-28
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
628-636
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W1861106557
Cited by
87
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Alzheimer Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
dementia, information services, advice services, caregivers, quality of life, neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver burden, telephone support, skills training, care navigation
MeSH terms
Counseling, Dementia, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Quality of Life, Social Support, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Caregivers, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review