Cited by 155Mental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A meta-analytic review on the prevention of symptoms of anxiety in children and adolescents

·2011·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.07.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1046-1059
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2482449541
Cited by
154
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
adolescent depression, depression prevention, cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, economic intervention, community-based psychotherapy, low- and middle-income countries, treatment effectiveness, access to mental health care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review