Cited by 8Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Research Topics

Cognitive risk factors and the experience of acute anxiety following social stressors: An ecological momentary assessment study

Saulnier, Kevin G., Saulnier, Shelby J., Allan, Nicholas P.·2022·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

To better understand how social anxiety develops, it is crucial to identify mechanisms that influence anxiety following social stressors. Anxiety sensitivity social concerns (ASSC; fear of publicly observable anxiety symptoms) and fear of negative evaluation (FNE; distress arising from concerns about negative judgment) are constructs that amplify anxiety following social stressors. However, it is unclear how ASSC and FNE influence acute anxiety following stressors in naturalistic settings. In the current study, the impact of ASSC and FNE on anxious arousal and anxious apprehension following stressors was examined in community adults (N = 83; M age = 29.66 years, SD = 12.49, 59.0% female) who completed questionnaires five times per day for two-weeks. Dynamic structural equation modeling was used to examine predictors of overall levels of anxiety as well as anxiety following social and nonsocial stressors. ASSC interacted with the presence of social stressors, such that ASSC positively predicted anxious arousal following social stressors. FNE interacted with the presence of nonsocial stressors to predict both forms of anxiety, such that FNE positively predicted anxiety following nonsocial stressors. These findings suggest ASSC may specifically amplify anxious arousal following social stressors, whereas FNE may broadly amplify anxiety following nonsocial stressors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102571

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A total of 4% (3/70) of the studies used a combination of hierarchical linear models and structural equation modeling.

    “A total of 4% (3/70) of the studies used a combination of hierarchical linear models and structural equation modeling [43,45,79]”
  • Anxiety sensitivity cognitive concerns uniquely amplify arousal as a consequence of social stress, whereas fear of negative evaluation predicted anxiety fluctuations.

    “Anxiety sensitivity cognitive concerns were shown to uniquely amplify arousal as a consequence of social stress, whereas fear of negative evaluation predicted anxiety fluctuations, indicating that these 2 cognitive constructs may be associated with SA in different ways [79].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saulnier, K. G., Saulnier, S. J., & Allan, N. P.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • Akron Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Saulnier, Kevin G.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
88
Pages
102571
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224313511
Cited by
8
References
66
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
fear of negative evaluation, social anxiety, social stressors, acute anxiety, anxious arousal, anxious apprehension, cognitive risk factors, ecological momentary assessment, dynamic structural equation modeling
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adult, Anxiety, Cognition, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review