The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complementor competitive advantage: A framework for strategic decisions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Third, multihoming complementors become part of a larger, more diverse group of peers whose activities might influence them (Cenamor, 2021;Srinivasan & Venkatraman, 2018).”
From What role do data network effects play for multihoming complements? An empirical analysis of platform complementors’ strategies for consumer value creation (2025) · cites this paper as Cenamor, 2021
In the citing paper
“In addition, iOS developers act in a mature ecosystem, characterized by competitive pressure on the complementor side (Cenamor, 2021;de Reuver et al., 2018).”
From What role do data network effects play for multihoming complements? An empirical analysis of platform complementors’ strategies for consumer value creation (2025) · cites this paper as Cenamor, 2021
In the citing paper
“Thus, complementors aim to keep a certain independence from the dominant platform provider (Cenamor, 2021;Srinivasan & Venkatraman, 2018).”
From What role do data network effects play for multihoming complements? An empirical analysis of platform complementors’ strategies for consumer value creation (2025) · cites this paper as Cenamor, 2021
In the citing paper
“Greater software independence from the focal platform helps developers realize the benefits of learning from others (Cenamor, 2021).”
From What role do data network effects play for multihoming complements? An empirical analysis of platform complementors’ strategies for consumer value creation (2025) · cites this paper as Cenamor, 2021
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/154247603322493212 · Cited by 5,642
Towards a theory of ecosystems
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2904 · Cited by 3,724
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0322 · Cited by 2,964
Systems Competition and Network Effects
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1994) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.8.2.93 · Cited by 2,646
Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1986) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261409 · Cited by 2,622
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013 · Cited by 2,435
Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework
Gawer, A. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,869 · cited 2×
“Thus, besides the attempts to build a theory of platform ecosystems (Gawer, 2014; Jaco-bides et al., 2018; Thomas et al., 2014), there is still a need for a theoretical framework for the study of complementors that may serve as a solid basis for future research developments.”
BackgroundChoudary, S. P., Alstyne, M. V., & PARKER, G. G. (2016) · Cited by 1,818
The Digital Platform: A Research Agenda
de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3 · Cited by 1,681
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cusumano, 2019, How digital platforms have become double-edged swords, MIT Sloan Management Review.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A socio-technical view of platform ecosystems: Systematic review and research agenda
Kapoor, K. K., Bigdeli, A. Z., Dwivedi, Y. K., Schroeder, A., Beltagui, A., & Baines, T. S. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.060 · Cited by 207
Mobile apps for SME business sustainability during COVID-19 and onwards
Rakshit, S., Islam, N., Mondal, S., & Paul, T. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.005 · Cited by 152
Processes of ecosystem emergence
Thomas, L. D. W., Autio, E., & Gann, D. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102441 · Cited by 134
Zabel, C., O’Brien, D., & Natzel, J. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122562 · Cited by 85
Nayak, B., Bhattacharyya, S. S., & Krishnamoorthy, B. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.047 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Cenamor, J.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Cenamor, Javier
- ORCID
- Cenamor, Javier
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 122
- Pages
- 335-343
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3087237957
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 123
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 12.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Familjen Kamprads Stiftelse
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Keywords
- platform ecosystems, complementors, strategic decision-making, open innovation, platform adoption, ecosystem strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
