Cited by 298COVID-19 and Mental HealthSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Treatment and Access

Abuse, self-harm and suicidal ideation in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Open access
Iob, Eleonora, Steptoe, Andrew, Fancourt, Daisy·2020·The British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Summary: This study explored patterns of abuse, self-harm and thoughts of suicide/self-harm in the UK during the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic using data from the COVID-19 Social Study ( n =44 775), a non-probability sample weighted to population proportions. The reported frequency of abuse, self-harm and thoughts of suicide/self-harm was higher among women, Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) groups and people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, unemployment, disability, chronic physical illnesses, mental disorders and COVID-19 diagnosis. Psychiatric medications were the most common type of support being used, but fewer than half of those affected were accessing formal or informal support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.2020.130

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportional consequences for patients suffering from mental health disorders, including potentially increased suicide risk and increased adversities.

    “So far, data clearly indicate disproportional consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic (16–18), even a potentially increased suicide risk (18), and an increase of adversities (19) in patients suffering from mental health disorders.”

    From Radical Acceptance of Reality: Putting DBT®-A Skill Groups Online During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study (2022) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Abstract and Discussion report that abuse, self-harm, and suicidal or self-harm thoughts during the first month of UK lockdown were more common among people with mental disorders. But the Discussion says comparisons with usual prevalence are challenging, so the paper does not establish the cited increase in adversities over pre-pandemic levels. The sentence cites a different source for potentially increased suicide risk. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a general population sample that included people who reported having been diagnosed with COVID-19, Iob et al. (2020) found suicide/self-harm thoughts were more common in those with a COVID-19 diagnosis than in those not affected (33% vs 17%), and likewise for suicide attempts (14% vs 5%).

    “In a general population sample that included people who reported having been diagnosed with COVID-19, Iob et al. (2020) found suicide/self-harm thoughts were more common in those with a COVID-19 diagnosis than in those not affected (33% vs 17%); likewise for suicide attempts (14% vs. 5%).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 7 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iob, E., Steptoe, A., & Fancourt, D.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Fancourt, Daisy
Venue
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2020-07-13
Volume
217
Issue
4
Pages
543-546
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W3041917899
Cited by
297
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 16
FWCI
25.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (WEL/FR-000022583, 221400/Z/20/Z, 205407/Z/16/Z, ES/S002588/1, 205407)
  • UK Research and Innovation (WEL/FR-000022583, 205407/Z/16/Z, [ES/S002588/1, 221400/Z/20/Z)
  • Nuffield Foundation (WEL/FR000022583, ES/S002588/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/S002588/1, 1907703)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, abuse, self-harm, suicidal ideation, domestic violence, socioeconomic deprivation, mental illness, psychiatric medication, help-seeking, COVID-19 diagnosis, disability, unemployment, chronic physical illness
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Support Systems, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Suicide Prevention, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Risk Factors, Social Isolation, Suicide, Prevalence, Self-Injurious Behavior, Domestic Violence, Coronavirus Infections, Risk Assessment, Pandemics, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review