Cited by 66Sports Analytics and PerformanceSport Psychology and PerformanceExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Confidence enhanced performance? – The causal effects of success on future performance in professional golf tournaments

Rosenqvist, Olof, Skans, Oskar Nordström·2015·Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.06.020

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenqvist, O., & Skans, O. N.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Skans, Oskar Nordström
Venue
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
117
Pages
281-295
ISSN
0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108789206
Cited by
66
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
future performance, professional golf, tournament performance, regression discontinuity design, prize money

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review