Cited by 26Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning Development

Reevaluating the selectivity of face-processing difficulties in children and adolescents with autism

Ewing, Louise, Pellicano, Elizabeth, Rhodes, Gillian·2013·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

There are few direct examinations of whether face-processing difficulties in autism are disproportionate to difficulties with other complex non-face stimuli. Here we examined discrimination ability and memory for faces, cars, and inverted faces in children and adolescents with and without autism. Results showed that, relative to typical children, the difficulties of children and adolescents with autism were not limited to, or disproportionately severe for, faces. Rather, these participants demonstrated significant difficulties in remembering and discriminating between faces and cars. This lack of face selectivity is inconsistent with prominent theories that attribute face-processing difficulties in autism to fundamental problems with social motivation or social attention. Instead, our results are consistent with a more pervasive perceptual atypicality that may affect autistic processing of non-face stimuli as well as face stimuli.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.01.009

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Atypical face processing in ASD could arise from sociocognitive factors or reflect visual processing deficits more broadly.

    “Atypical face processing in ASD could arise from sociocognitive factors, or reflect visual processing deficits more broadly, such as distinguishing between both social and non-social stimuli that are visually complex or highly similar, including upright faces, inverted faces, and cars (Ewing et al., 2013); and poor ability to discriminate between novel, and perceptually similar objects (Greebles)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ewing, L., Pellicano, E., & Rhodes, G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ewing, Louise
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
115
Issue
2
Pages
342-355
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067791528
Cited by
26
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, face processing, face selectivity, face discrimination, face memory, inverted faces, social motivation, social attention, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Child, Discrimination, Psychological, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Case-Control Studies, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review