Cited by 325Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning Development

Face Perception in Children with Autism and Asperger's Syndrome

Davies, Susan, Bishop, Dorothy, Manstead, Antony S. R., Tantam, Digby·1994·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Children with diagnoses of either autism or Asperger's syndrome were matched on measures of verbal mental age with nonautistic control children. They were tested on their abilities to process both facial and nonfacial stimuli. There were no significant differences between the low ability autistic and control groups, but the high ability autistic and Asperger's children performed significantly worse than controls across all tests. Group averages masked substantial individual variation. The results are seen as indicating a general perceptual deficit that is not specific to faces or emotions. This appears to be a common correlate of autism and Asperger's syndrome, rather than a core symptom.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01808.x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are only a couple of studies which suggest that ASD populations may have problems with some types of object judgement.

    “There are only a couple of studies which suggest that ASD populations may have problems with some types of object judgement”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 1994

  • The object processing abilities of individuals with ASD are generally reported to be equivalent to those of control populations.

    “the object processing abilities of individuals with ASD are generally reported to be equivalent to those of control populations”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, S., Bishop, D., Manstead, A. S. R., & Tantam, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Tantam, Digby
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-09
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
1033-1057
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2078671228
Cited by
325
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
face perception, autism spectrum disorder, Asperger syndrome, perceptual deficits, face processing, emotion perception, high-functioning autism, individual differences
MeSH terms
Aptitude, Attention, Autistic Disorder, Child, Discrimination Learning, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Intellectual Disability, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review