Cited by 69Face Recognition and PerceptionAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning Development

Atypical development of face and greeble recognition in autism

Open access
Suzanne Scherf, K., Behrmann, Marlene, Minshew, Nancy, Luna, Beatriz·2008·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impaired face processing is a widely documented deficit in autism. Although the origin of this deficit is unclear, several groups have suggested that a lack of perceptual expertise is contributory. We investigated whether individuals with autism develop expertise in visuoperceptual processing of faces and whether any deficiency in such processing is specific to faces, or extends to other objects, too. METHOD: Participants performed perceptual discrimination tasks, including a face inversion task and a classification-level task, which requires especially fine-grained discriminations, on three classes of stimuli: socially-laden faces, perceptually homogenous novel objects, greebles, and perceptually heterogeneous common objects. RESULTS: We found that children with autism develop typical levels of expertise for recognition of common objects. However, they evince poorer recognition for perceptually homogenous objects, including faces and, most especially, greebles. CONCLUSIONS: Documenting the atypical recognition abilities for greebles in children with autism has provided an important insight into the potential origin of the relatively poor face recognition skills. Our findings suggest that, throughout development, individuals with autism have a generalized deficit in visuoperceptual processing that may interfere with their ability to undertake configural processing, and that this, in turn, adversely impacts their recognition of within-class perceptually homogenous objects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01903.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Atypical face processing in ASD could arise from sociocognitive factors or reflect visual processing deficits more broadly.

    “Atypical face processing in ASD could arise from sociocognitive factors, or reflect visual processing deficits more broadly, such as distinguishing between both social and non-social stimuli that are visually complex or highly similar, including upright faces, inverted faces, and cars (Ewing et al., 2013); and poor ability to discriminate between novel, and perceptually similar objects (Greebles)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Carey S, Diamond R. Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children? Visual Cognition. 1994;1(2–3):253–274. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lopez B, Donnelly N, Hadwin JA, Leekam SR. Face prcessing in high-functioning adolescents with autism: Evidence for weak central coherence. Visual Cognition. 2004;11(6):673–688. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lord C, Rutter M, DiLavore PC, Risi S. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Lost Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  4. Nishimura M, Rutherford MD, Maurer D. Converging evidence of configural processing in high-functioning adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Visual Cognition. (in press) [Google Scholar]
  5. Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A. E-Prime User's Guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Tools, Inc; 2001. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suzanne Scherf, K., Behrmann, M., Minshew, N., & Luna, B.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07-28
Volume
49
Issue
8
Pages
838-847
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2149672898
Cited by
69
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01/U19 HD35469-07, T32HD049354, U19HD035469, P50HD055748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, face recognition (cognition), Greebles, perceptual expertise, configural processing, face inversion, object recognition
MeSH terms
Adult, Autistic Disorder, Child, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Perceptual Disorders, Visual Perception, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review