Cited by 47Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Spatial and vertical variations of perfluoroalkyl substances in sediments of the Haihe River, China

Zhao, Xiuli, Xia, Xinghui, Zhang, Shangwei, Wu, Qiong, Wang, Xuejun·2014·Journal of Environmental Sciences

Abstract

The levels of six perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in surface sediment and their vertical variations in dated sediment cores from the Haihe River were investigated; studied substances included perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnA), and perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA). Results showed that the total PFAS concentration in surface sediment ranged between 0.52 and 16.33 ng/g dry weight (dw) with an average of 3.47 ng/g dw, with PFOS and PFOA as the dominant PFASs. In general, the PFAS concentrations in the mainstream increased from the upper to the lower reaches, except that a drop occurred downstream of the Erdao dam. Although the PFASs in the sediment cores did not show a clear decreasing or increasing trend with depth, the three cores had a similar vertical variation. The PFAS levels were relatively low in the surface sediment, and reached the first high point at 8-20 cm as a result of the wide use of PFASs from 1990 to 2000. After that the PFAS levels decreased, and then increased to a second high point at about 40-48 cm, which might be caused by the leaching of PFASs in sediment. Because PFASs have hydrophilic groups and relatively high solubility, the PFASs will transfer from the upper to lower layers of sediment when water infiltration occurs, leading to the fluctuation of PFAS levels in sediment cores. This study suggests that both the temporal variation of sources and transfer processes of PFASs in sediments are important factors influencing the vertical variation of PFASs in sediment cores.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jes.2014.05.023

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, X., Xia, X., Zhang, S., Wu, Q., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xia, Xinghui
Venue
Journal of Environmental Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
1557-1566
ISSN
1001-0742 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049032225
Cited by
47
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Environmental Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, PFAS contamination, river sediments, sediment core, vertical distribution, surface sediments, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, perfluorodecanoic acid, sediment leaching, water infiltration, Haihe River
MeSH terms
China, Environmental Pollutants, Fluorocarbons, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Geologic Sediments, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review