Cited by 577Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchGenomics and Rare Diseases

The impact of next-generation sequencing on genomics

Open access
Zhang, Jun, Chiodini, Rod, Badr, Ahmed, Zhang, Genfa·2011·Journal of Genetics and Genomics

Abstract

This article reviews basic concepts, general applications, and the potential impact of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies on genomics, with particular reference to currently available and possible future platforms and bioinformatics. NGS technologies have demonstrated the capacity to sequence DNA at unprecedented speed, thereby enabling previously unimaginable scientific achievements and novel biological applications. But, the massive data produced by NGS also presents a significant challenge for data storage, analyses, and management solutions. Advanced bioinformatic tools are essential for the successful application of NGS technology. As evidenced throughout this review, NGS technologies will have a striking impact on genomic research and the entire biological field. With its ability to tackle the unsolved challenges unconquered by previous genomic technologies, NGS is likely to unravel the complexity of the human genome in terms of genetic variations, some of which may be confined to susceptible loci for some common human conditions. The impact of NGS technologies on genomics will be far reaching and likely change the field for years to come.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jgg.2011.02.003

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., Chiodini, R., Badr, A., & Zhang, G.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Jun
Venue
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
95-109
ISSN
  • 1873-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1673-8527
OpenAlex
W2083854815
Cited by
577
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 64
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of genetics and genomics/Journal of Genetics and Genomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS061191)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
next-generation sequencing, genomics, sequencing platforms, bioinformatics software, genomic data storage, genetic variation, human genome, sequencing data analysis
MeSH terms
Humans, Software, Genetic Variation, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Computational Biology, Genomics, Nanotechnology, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review