Cited by 75Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

A systematic review of the literature on plastic pollution in the Laurentian Great Lakes and its effects on freshwater biota

Earn, Arielle, Bucci, Kennedy, Rochman, Chelsea M.·2021·Journal of Great Lakes Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jglr.2020.11.001

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Earn, A., Bucci, K., & Rochman, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Rochman, Chelsea M.
Venue
Journal of Great Lakes Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
120-133
ISSN
0380-1330 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3107687046
Cited by
75
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Great Lakes Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Environment and Climate Change Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
plastic pollution, Great Lakes, microplastics, macroplastics, freshwater organisms, benthic sediments, citizen science, particle size and shape, freshwater ecosystems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review