CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions

Perea, Manuel, Lupker, Stephen J·2004·Journal of Memory and Language
DOI 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Andrews, 1996, Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability, Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775, 10.1006/jmla.1996.0040 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Berent, 1995, A rose is a REEZ: The two cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English, Psychological Review, 102, 146, 10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.146 · DOI
  3. Berent, 2001, The effect of shared structure and content on reading nonwords: Evidence for a CV skeleton, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 27, 1042, 10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.1042 · DOI
  4. Bertoncini, 1988, An investigation of young infants’ perceptual representation of speech sounds, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 21, 10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.21 · DOI
  5. Boatman, 1997, Neuroperceptual differences in consonant and vowel discrimination: As revealed by direct cortical electrical interference, Cortex, 33, 83, 10.1016/S0010-9452(97)80006-8 · DOI
  6. Caramazza, 2000, Separable processing of consonants and vowels, Nature, 403, 428, 10.1038/35000206 · DOI
  7. Caramazza, 1990, The structure of graphemic representations, Cognition, 37, 243, 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90047-N · DOI
  8. Carr, 1985, Recognizing printed words: A look at current models, Vol. 5, 1
  9. Carreiras, 2004, Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency, Brain and Language, 90, 393, 10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.003 · DOI
  10. Colombo, 2003, The status of consonants and vowels in phonological assembly: Testing the two-cycles model with Italian, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 405, 10.1080/09541440303605 · DOI
  11. Coltheart, 2001, DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud, Psychological Review, 108, 204, 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chambers, 1979, Letter and order information in lexical access, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 225, 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90136-1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Cubelli, 1991, A selective deficit for writing vowels in acquired dysgraphia, Nature, 353, 258, 10.1038/353258a0 · DOI
  14. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales
  15. Drewnowski, 1980, Memory functions for vowels and consonants: A reinterpretation of acoustic similarity effects, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 176, 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90162-0 · DOI
  16. Ferreres, 2000, Alexia por alteración de la vı́a perilexical de lectura, Revista Neurológica Argentina, 25, 17
  17. Forster, 1984, Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 10, 680, 10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680 · DOI
  18. Forster, 1987, Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211, 10.1080/14640748708401785 · DOI
  19. Forster, 2003, DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116, 10.3758/BF03195503 · DOI
  20. Gafos, 1998, Eliminating long-distance consonantal spreading, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 223, 10.1023/A:1005968600965 · DOI
  21. Hino, 2003, Masked repetition priming and word frequency effects across different types of Japanese scripts: An examination of the lexical activation account, Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 33, 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00500-4 · DOI
  22. Lane, 1987, PsychLib: A library of machine language routines for controlling psychology experiments on the Apple Macintosh computer, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 19, 246, 10.3758/BF03203793 · DOI
  23. Lee, 2001, The relative contribution of consonants and vowels to word identification during reading, Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 189, 10.1006/jmla.2000.2725 · DOI
  24. Lee, 2002, The processing of consonants and vowels in reading: Evidence from the fast priming paradigm, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 766, 10.3758/BF03196333 · DOI
  25. Mewhort, 1981, Identification, localization, and “iconic memory”: An evaluation of the bar-probe task, Memory & Cognition, 9, 50, 10.3758/BF03196951 · DOI
  26. Monaghan, 2003, Connectionist modeling of the separable processing of consonants and vowels, Brain and Language, 86, 83, 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00536-9 · DOI
  27. Nespor, 2003, On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition, Lingue e Linguaggio, 2, 221
  28. O’Connor, 1981, Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition, Memory & Cognition, 9, 78, 10.3758/BF03196953 · DOI
  29. Perea, 1998, Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 134, 10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.134 · DOI
  30. Perea, 2003, Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming, Memory & Cognition, 31, 829, 10.3758/BF03196438 · DOI
  31. Perea, 2000, Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus-onset asynchrony, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 668, 10.3758/BF03213005 · DOI
  32. Peressotti, 1995, Letter-position coding in random consonant arrays, Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 875, 10.3758/BF03206802 · DOI
  33. Peressotti, 1999, The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming, Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 691, 10.3758/BF03205539 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Ratcliff, 1981, A theory of order relations in perceptual matching, Psychological Review, 88, 552, 10.1037/0033-295X.88.6.552 · DOI
  35. Rumelhart, 1982, An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model, Psychological Review, 89, 60, 10.1037/0033-295X.89.1.60 · DOI
  36. Schoonbaert, 2004, Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters, Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333, 10.1080/01690960344000198 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Sears, 1995, Neighborhood frequency and neighborhood size effects in word recognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 876, 10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.876 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Siakaluk, 2002, Orthographic neighborhood effects in lexical decision: The effects of nonword orthographic neighborhood size, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 661, 10.1037/0096-1523.28.3.661 · DOI
  39. Tainturier, 1996, The status of double letters in graphemic representations, Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 53, 10.1006/jmla.1996.0003 · DOI
  40. Westall, 1986, Accurate millisecond timing on the Apple Macintosh using Drexler’s Millitimer, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 18, 307, 10.3758/BF03204405 · DOI
  41. Whitney, 1999, A new model of letter string encoding: Simulating right neglect dyslexia, Vol. 121, 143
  42. Whitney, 2001, How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221, 10.3758/BF03196158 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J.
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
231-246
ISSN
0749-596X
DOI
10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
Cited by
312
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review