Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 626

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Innocent Bystanders? Monetary policy and inequality

Open access
Coibion, Olivier, Gorodnichenko, Yuriy, Kueng, Lorenz, Silvia, John·2017·Journal of Monetary Economics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2017.05.005

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Aguiar, 2015, Has consumption inequality mirrored income inequality?, Am. Econ. Rev., 105, 2725, 10.1257/aer.20120599 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Albanesi, 2007, Inflation and inequality, J. Monetary Econ., 54, 1088, 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.02.009 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Attanasio, O., Battistin, E., Ichimura, H. 2004. What really happened to consumption inequality in the US? NBER Working Paper 10338. · doi:10.3386/w10338
  4. Boivin, 2006, Has U.S. monetary policy changed? Evidence from drifting coefficients and real-time data, J. Money, Credit Banking, 38, 1149, 10.1353/mcb.2006.0065 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Carpenter, 2004, The disparate labor market impacts of monetary policy, J. Policy Anal. Manage., 23, 813, 10.1002/pam.20048 · doi:10.1002/pam.20048
  6. Christiano, 1999, Monetary policy shocks: what have we learned and to what end?, 65, 10.1016/S1574-0048(99)01005-8 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Christiano, 2005, Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy, J. Political Econ., 113, 1, 10.1086/426038 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Clarida, 2000, Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: evidence and some theory, Q. J. Econ., 115, 147, 10.1162/003355300554692 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Coibion, 2011, Monetary policy, trend inflation and the great moderation: an alternative interpretation, Am. Econ. Rev., 101, 341, 10.1257/aer.101.1.341 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Coibion, 2012, What can survey forecasts tell us about information rigidities?, J. Political Econ., 120, 116, 10.1086/665662 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Coibion, 2012, Why are target interest rate changes so persistent?, Am. Econ. J., 4, 126
  12. Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., Koustas, D. 2017. Consumption inequality and the frequency of purchases, NBER Working Paper 23357. · doi:10.3386/w23357
  13. Doepke, 2006, Inflation and the redistribution of nominal wealth, J. Political Econ., 114, 1069, 10.1086/508379 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Erosa, 2002, On inflation as a regressive consumption tax, J. Monetary Economic, 49, 761, 10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00115-0 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Feenberg, 1993, An introduction to the TAXSIM model, J. Policy Anal. Manage., 12, 189, 10.2307/3325474 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Furceri, D., Loungani, P., Zdzienicka, A., 2016. The effects of monetary policy shocks on inequality, IMF Working Paper WP/16/245. · doi:10.5089/9781475563092.001
  17. Gorodnichenko, 2016, Are sticky prices costly? Evidence from the stock market, Am. Econ. Rev., 106, 165, 10.1257/aer.20131513 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Guvenen, 2014, The nature of countercyclical income risk, J. Political Econ., 122, 621, 10.1086/675535 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Heathcote, 2010, Unequal we stand: An empirical analysis of economic inequality in the U.S., 1967-2006, Rev. Econ. Dyn., 13, 15, 10.1016/j.red.2009.10.010 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Ireland, 2006, Changes in the federal reserve's inflation target: causes and consequences, J. Money Credit Banking, 39, 1851, 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00091.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Jordà, 2005, Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections, Am. Econ. Rev., 95, 161, 10.1257/0002828053828518 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kaplan, G., Moll, B., Violante, G.L., 2016. Monetary policy according to HANK, NBER Working Paper 21897. · DOI
  23. Kozicki, 2009, Perhaps the 1970s FOMC did what it said it did, J. Monetary Econ., 56, 842, 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.06.009 · DOI
  24. Krueger, 2005, Does income inequality lead to consumption inequality? Evidence and theory, Rev. Econ. Stud., 73, 163, 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2006.00373.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kumhof, 2015, Inequality, leverage, and crises, Am. Econ. Rev., 105, 1217, 10.1257/aer.20110683 · DOI · Paper page
  26. McKay, 2016, The role of automatic stabilizers in the U.S. business cycle, Econometrica, 84, 141, 10.3982/ECTA11574 · doi:10.3982/ecta11574
  27. Pagan, 1984, Econometric issues in the analysis of regressions with generated regressors, Int. Econ. Rev., 25, 221, 10.2307/2648877 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Parker, 1999, The reaction of household consumption to predictable changes in social security taxes, Am. Econ. Rev., 89, 959, 10.1257/aer.89.4.959 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Parker, 2009, Who bears aggregate fluctuations and how?, Am. Econ. Rev., 99, 399, 10.1257/aer.99.2.399 · doi:10.1257/aer.99.2.399
  30. Piketty, 2003, Income inequality in the United States, 1913-1998, Q. J. Econ., 118, 1, 10.1162/00335530360535135 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Romer, 2004, A new measure of monetary shocks: derivation and implications, Am. Econ. Rev., 94, 1055, 10.1257/0002828042002651 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Williamson, 2009, Monetary policy and distribution, J. Monetary Econ., 55, 1038, 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2008.07.001 · doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2008.07.001

Cited by

See all 626

Metadata

Authors
Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., Kueng, L., & Silvia, J.
Venue
Journal of Monetary Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
88
Pages
70-89
ISSN
0304-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2614629730
Cited by
626
References
4
FWCI
102.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innocent Bystanders? Monetary policy and inequality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2017.05.005
The paper
Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., Kueng, L., & Silvia, J. (2017). Innocent Bystanders? Monetary policy and inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2017.05.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.