Cited by 67Gastrointestinal motility and disordersDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Intervening on cognitions and behavior in irritable bowel syndrome: A feasibility trial using PDAs

Open access
Oerlemans, Simone, van Cranenburgh, Oda, Herremans, Pieter-Jan, Spreeuwenberg, Peter, van Dulmen, Sandra·2011·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common, chronic, and often disabling disorder. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in alleviating IBS symptoms. The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility and the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral e-intervention using personal digital assistants (PDAs) on the self-management of IBS patients.Methods A feasibility trial was conducted with 38 control group patients receiving standard care and 37 intervention group patients receiving standard care supplemented with a 4-week CBT intervention on PDAs. All patients fulfilled the diagnostic Rome III criteria for IBS. At baseline, 4-week, and 3-month follow-up, patients' abdominal pain, dysfunctional cognitions, IBS quality of life, and pain catastrophizing thoughts were assessed using written questionnaires.Results Between-group comparisons between baseline and 4 weeks showed more overall quality of life improvement, more improvement in catastrophizing thoughts, and more pain improvement in the intervention group. Only improvement in catastrophizing thoughts persisted in the long-term. No significant differences between groups were found for dysfunctional cognitions. As all 37 intervention group patients completed the intervention and completed diaries three times a day for 4 weeks, the e-health intervention seems feasible.Conclusions A cognitive-behavioral intervention on pocket-type computers appears feasible and efficacious for improving IBS-related complaints and cognitions in the short-term. The intervention group improved on several aspects, but most on catastrophizing thoughts, and these improvements even persisted after 3 months. Future studies should focus on unravelling the effective components of this innovative e-health intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.09.018

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oerlemans, S., van Cranenburgh, O., Herremans, P.-J., Spreeuwenberg, P., & van Dulmen, S.
Affiliations
Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
267-277
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043755040
Cited by
67
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, cognitive behavioral therapy, digital health interventions, personal digital assistants, self-management, pain catastrophizing, dysfunctional cognitions, abdominal pain, quality of life, feasibility, mobile health
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Behavior Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Computers, Handheld, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Catastrophization, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review