The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 2×
“…see Buss & Craik, 1981), though it might be especially problematic here, since the FIRN model conceptualizations of the FFM domains tap into fundamental tendencies to respond to abstract situational stimuli that may be too subtle or complex for individuals to comment on (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977).”
BackgroundValidation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404 · cited 2×
“Third, extraversion has been linked to the motivational predisposition to experience social interactions as rewarding (Ashton & Lee, 2001; McCrae & Costa, 1987).”
BackgroundResultThe development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246 · Cited by 3,889
Cognitive consequences of forced compliance.
Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0041593 · Cited by 2,945
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 · Cited by 2,517
Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Advantages of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868306294907 · Cited by 2,171
A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Block, J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · Cited by 1,682 · cited 4×
“Although the FFM has become an increasingly accepted integrative framework for personality research, it has been criticized because of its primarily descriptive nature (e.g., Block, 1995; McAdams, 1992).”
BackgroundInfluentialFleeson, W. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011 · Cited by 1,436
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- Ackerman, 1996, A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge, Intelligence, 22, 227, 10.1016/S0160-2896(96)90016-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Ashton, 1998, Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 289, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<289::AID-JOB841>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI · Paper page
- Ashton, 2001, A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality, European Journal of Personality, 15, 327, 10.1002/per.417 · DOI · Paper page
- Ashton, 1998, Joint factor analysis of the Personality Research Form and the Jackson Personality Inventory: Comparisons with the Big Five, Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 243, 10.1006/jrpe.1998.2214 · DOI
- Ashton, 2002, What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 245, 10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.245 · DOI · Paper page
- Ashton, 2004, A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356, 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356 · DOI · Paper page
- Berzonsky, 1992, Social-cognitive aspects of identity style: Need for cognition, experimental openness, and introspection, Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 140, 10.1177/074355489272002 · DOI · Paper page
- Bolger, 1989, Effects of daily stress on negative mood, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 808, 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.808 · DOI · Paper page
- Buss, 1981, The act frequency analysis of interpersonal dispositions: Aloofness, gregariousness, dominance and submissiveness, Journal of Personality, 49, 175, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1981.tb00736.x · DOI
- Campbell, 2003, Putting personality in social context: Extraversion, emergent leadership, and the availability of rewards, Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1547, 10.1177/0146167203256920 · DOI
- Costa, 1988, From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 258, 10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.258 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.258 · Paper page
- Costa, 1995, Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: A reply to Block, Psychological Bulletin, 117, 216, 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.216 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.216 · Paper page
- Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (in press). Neuroticism predicts reactions to cues of social inclusion. European Journal of Personality.
- Goff, 1992, Personality–intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intellectual engagement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537, 10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.537 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.537 · Paper page
- Gosling, 2001, From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research?, Psychological Bulletin, 127, 45, 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.45 · DOI · Paper page
- Graziano, 1996, Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820, 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.820 · DOI · Paper page
- Gross, 1998, Relations between affect and personality: Support for the affect-level and affective-reactivity views, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 279, 10.1177/0146167298243005 · DOI · Paper page
- Heller, 2007, The dynamics of personality states, goals, and well-being, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 898, 10.1177/0146167207301010 · DOI
- Holmes, 2002, Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective, Personal Relationships, 9, 1, 10.1111/1475-6811.00001 · DOI · Paper page
- Koole, 2001, On the social nature of personality: Effects of extraversion, agreeableness, and feedback about collective resource use on cooperation in a resource dilemma, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 289, 10.1177/0146167201273003 · DOI
- Leary, 2000, The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory, Vol. 32, 1
- MacDonald, 1995, Evolution, the Five-Factor Model, and levels of personality, Journal of Personality, 63, 525, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00505.x · DOI · Paper page
- MacDonald, 1998, Evolution, culture, and the five-factor model, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 119, 10.1177/0022022198291007 · DOI
- Marco, 1993, Daily stress and the trajectory of mood: Spillover, contrast, and trait negative affectivity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1053, 10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.1053 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.1053
- Markon, 2005, Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139, 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139 · DOI · Paper page
- McAdams, 1992, The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal, Journal of Personality, 60, 329, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00976.x · DOI · Paper page
- McAdams, 2006, A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality, American Psychologist, 61, 204, 10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204 · DOI · Paper page
- Mischel, 1994, Personality psychology has two goals: Must it be two fields?, Psychological Inquiry, 5, 156, 10.1207/s15327965pli0502_15 · DOI
- Molenaar, 2004, A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology—this time forever, Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 201, 10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1 · DOI · Paper page
- Nettle, 2005, An evolutionary approach to the extraversion continuum, Evolution & Human Behavior, 26, 363, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Ozer, 2006, Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes, Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401, 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127 · DOI · Paper page
- Paulhus, 1998, Self-report measures of intelligence: Are they useful as proxy IQ tests?, Journal of Personality, 66, 525, 10.1111/1467-6494.00023 · DOI · Paper page
- Paunonen, 2003, Big Five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 411, 10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.411 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.411 · Paper page
- Penke, 2007, The evolutionary genetics of personality, European Journal of Personality, 21, 549, 10.1002/per.629 · DOI · Paper page
- Penke, 2007, Evolution, genes, and inter-disciplinary personality research, European Journal of Personality, 21, 639, 10.1002/per.657 · DOI
- Pytlik Zillig, 2002, What do we assess when we assess a Big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes represented in Big 5 personality inventories, Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 847, 10.1177/0146167202289013 · DOI · Paper page
- Revelle, 1995, Personality processes, Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 295, 10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.001455 · DOI · Paper page
- Roberts, 2000, Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: The intersection of personality traits and major life goals, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1284, 10.1177/0146167200262009 · DOI · Paper page
- Rusting, 1997, Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positive and negative affect: A test of two theoretical models, Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 607, 10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00246-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Sih, 2004, Behavioral syndromes: An integrative overview, The Quarterly Review of Biology, 79, 241, 10.1086/422893 · DOI · Paper page
- Snyder, 1985, Personality and social behavior, Vol. 2, 883
- Suls, 1998, Emotional reactivity to everyday problems, affective inertia, and neuroticism, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 127, 10.1177/0146167298242002 · DOI · Paper page
- van de Vijver, 2002, Structural equivalence in multilevel research, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 141, 10.1177/0022022102033002002 · DOI · Paper page
- van Lange, 1997, Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733, 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733 · DOI · Paper page
- van Lieshout, 2000, Lifespan personality development: Self-organising goal-oriented agents and developmental outcome, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 276, 10.1080/01650250050118259 · DOI
- Via, 1995, Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: Consensus and controversy, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 212, 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89061-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Watson, 1994, Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 18, 10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.18 · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.103.1.18 · Paper page
- Werner, 1986, The content of personality inventory items, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 622, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.622 · DOI
- Winter, 1998, Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research, Psychological Review, 105, 230, 10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.230 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
DeYoung, C. G. (2015) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004 · Cited by 1,057
Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.
Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000217 · Cited by 689
Dweck, C. S. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000082 · Cited by 683
The evolutionary genetics of personality
Penke, L., Denissen, J. J. A., & Miller, G. F. (2007) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.629 · Cited by 610
Self-citationGurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030841 · Cited by 415
“There are no a priori reasons for expecting a particular number of trait dimensions or within-trait and intertrait correlations, although post hoc explanations of empirical regularities have been made (e.g., Denissen & Penke, 2008; Nettle, 2010).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1285-1302
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160129390
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 16.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.002
- The paper
- Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.