The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The curiosity and exploration inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics
Open accessAbstract
Given curiosity's fundamental role in motivation, learning, and well-being, we sought to refine the measurement of trait curiosity with an improved version of the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory (CEI; Kashdan, Rose, & Fincham, 2004). A preliminary pool of 36 items was administered to 311 undergraduate students, who also completed measures of emotion, emotion regulation, personality, and well-being. Factor analyses indicated a two factor model-motivation to seek out knowledge and new experiences (Stretching; 5 items) and a willingness to embrace the novel, uncertain, and unpredictable nature of everyday life (Embracing; 5 items). In two additional samples (ns = 150 and 119), we cross-validated this factor structure and provided initial evidence for construct validity. This includes positive correlations with personal growth, openness to experience, autonomy, purpose in life, self-acceptance, psychological flexibility, positive affect, and positive social relations, among others. Applying item response theory (IRT) to these samples (n = 578), we showed that the items have good discrimination and a desirable breadth of difficulty. The item information functions and test information function were centered near zero, indicating that the scale assesses the mid-range of the latent curiosity trait most reliably. The findings thus far provide good evidence for the psychometric properties of the 10-item CEI-II.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788 · cited 1×
“Current guidelines regarding model fit indices (Brown, 2006; Hu & Bentler, 1999; Kline, 2004) suggest that CFA/ NNFI values P.95, and RMSEA/SRMR values 6.08 indicate good model fit.”
BackgroundInfluentialRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599 · cited 1×
“…that are identical to curiosity: ''Perhaps no single phenomenon reflects the positive potential of human nature as much as intrinsic motivation, the inherent tendency to seek out novelty and challenges, to extend and exercise one's capacities, to explore, and to learn " (Ryan & Deci, 2000, p. 70).”
BackgroundPrinciples and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210 · cited 2×
“Besides the social benefits linked to curiosity, other psychological needs for autonomy and self-acceptance ([Deci and Ryan, 2000] and [Ryff, 1989]) were more likely to be satisfied for highly curious people.”
BackgroundDevelopment and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266 · cited 1×
“** p < .001. imation (RMSEA; Steiger & Lind, 1980), the standardized root mean residual (SRMR; Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1996), the non-normed fit index (NNFI; Bentler & Bonett, 1980), and the comparative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990).”
BackgroundSignificance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015 · cited 1×
“** p < .001. imation (RMSEA; Steiger & Lind, 1980), the standardized root mean residual (SRMR; Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1996), the non-normed fit index (NNFI; Bentler & Bonett, 1980), and the comparative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990).”
BackgroundConfirmatory factor analysis for applied research
Brown, T. A. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2769 · Cited by 15,621 · cited 3×
“Current guidelines regarding model fit indices (Brown, 2006; Hu & Bentler, 1999; Kline, 2004) suggest that CFA/ NNFI values P.95, and RMSEA/SRMR values 6.08 indicate good model fit.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Berlyne, 1967, Arousal and reinforcement, Vol. 15, 1
- Tomkins, 1962, Vol. 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 672
Fayn, K., Silvia, P. J., Erbaş, Y., Tiliopoulos, N., & Kuppens, P. (2017) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2017.1322554 · Cited by 49
“Large positive correlations between stretching, embracing, and total curiosity scales were observed, consistent with past work (Kashdan et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationNichter, B., Haller, M. M., Norman, S. B., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2019) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.11.008 · Cited by 45
Post, T., & van der Molen, J. H. W. (2018) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.03.005 · Cited by 43
Heinz, A. J., Freeman, M. A., Harpaz‐Rotem, I., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2017) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1037/mil0000195 · Cited by 42
“1 “strongly disagree,” 7 “strongly agree”; Scheier, Carver, & Bridges, 1994), Purpose in Life Test- Short Form (e.g., 4-items, “My personal existence is:” 1 “meaningless, without purpose,” 7 “purposeful, meaningful”; Schulenberg, Schnetzer, & Buchanan, 2011), Gratitude Questionnaire (single item, “I have so much in li…”
BackgroundInfluentialCuriosity may have killed the cat but it has the power to improve employee creativity
Zada, M., Khan, J., Saeed, I., Zada, S., & Jun, Z. Y. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-04171-y · Cited by 47
“A scale developed by Kashdan et al. (2009) with 10-items scale was used to measure curiosity.”
MethodMerino, M. D., & Privado, J. (2014) · Anales de Psicología · doi:10.6018/analesps.31.1.171081 · Cited by 52
Tsai, J., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2017) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.12800 · Cited by 50
“Sociodemographic characteristics Age, sex, race, highest level of education, household income Military characteristics Years served in military: report of number of years served in military Personality characteristics Score on extraversion subscale of the ten-item personality inventory (58) Score on agreeableness subs…”
Curiosity in Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda
Strzelecki, A., Jaciow, M., & Wolny, R. (2024) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.70001 · Cited by 48
Investigating Indonesian EFL Learners’ Learning and Acquiring English Vocabulary
Patahuddin, P., Syawal, S., & Bin-Tahir, S. Z. (2017) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v7n4p128 · Cited by 39
Big five personality factors and travel curiosity: are they related?
Jani, D. (2014) · Anatolia · doi:10.1080/13032917.2014.909366 · Cited by 38
“Kashdan et al. (2009) using two dimensions of stretching and embracing curiosity, noted the latter to have significant positive correlations with openness to experience, conscientiousness, and extraversions but negatively correlated with neuroticism.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialYe, S. S., Ng, T. K., Yim, K. H., & Jun, W. (2015) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1013546 · Cited by 43
“Based on previous empirical studies, researchers have developed various tools for measuring curiosity (e.g., Collins, Litman, & Spielberger, 2004; Kashdan et al., 2009; Kashdan, Rose, & Fincham, 2004; Litman & Silvia, 2006; Litman & Spielberger, 2003), among which is the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory (CEI) desig…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialGruber, M. J., Valji, A., & Ranganath, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316823279.018 · Cited by 55
Denneson, L. M., Smolenski, D. J., Bush, N. E., & Dobscha, S. K. (2017) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.018 · Cited by 40
“The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory (CEI-II) consists of two subscales measuring motivation to seek new knowledge and experiences (stretching) and comfort with novel and unpredictable nature of life (embracing) (Kashdan et al., 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialJeraj, M., & Antončić, B. (2013) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.843350 · Cited by 36
“Nevertheless, the study of curiosity has been plagued by inconsistent terminology, operational definitions, and measurement strategies (Kashdan et al., 2009).”
BackgroundGooding, D. C., Winston, T. M., Pflum, M. J., & Burgin, C. J. (2015) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.061 · Cited by 35
“Participants completed Kashdan et al. (2009) Curiosity and Exploration Inventory (CEI-II).”
Open to death: A moderating role of openness to experience in terror management
Boyd, P., Morris, K. L., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.003 · Cited by 39
“Openness is also positively associated with trait curiosity (Kashdan et al., 2009) and finding things interesting (e.g., poems, Silvia & Sanders, 2010), both of which are linked to greater psychological well-being (e.g., Kashdan et al., 2009; Park, Peterson, & Seligman, 2004; Silvia, 2006).”
BackgroundNg, V., Lee, P., Ho, M. R., Kuykendall, L. E., Stark, S. E., & Tay, L. (2020) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2020.1739056 · Cited by 35
“Convergent/Discriminant Validity Scales Eight scales were identified as measuring the same or similar broad character dimension and served as convergent validity scales for appreciation (The Gratitude Questionnaire or GQ; McCullough, Emmons, & Tsang, 2002), intellectual engagement (The Curiosity and Exploration Invent…”
BackgroundMale bisexual arousal: A matter of curiosity?
Rieger, G., Rosenthal, A. M., Cash, B. M., Linsenmeier, J. A. W., Bailey, J. M., & Savin‐Williams, R. C. (2013) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.09.007 · Cited by 35
Subjective well-being as a mediator for curiosity and depression
Kaczmarek, L. D., Bączkowski, B. M., Enko, J., Baran, B., & Theuns, P. (2014) · Polish Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.2478/ppb-2014-0025 · Cited by 41
“Additionally, existing studies showed positive associations between well-being and intrinsic motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2000), flow (Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi, 2005), or openness to experience (McCrae & Costa, 1999) which are all related to curiosity (Kashdan et al., 2009).”
BackgroundTan, C.-S., Hashim, I., Pheh, K., Pratt, C., Chung, M., & Setyowati, A. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01430-2 · Cited by 28
The development and validation of a measure of character: The CIVIC
Ng, V., Tay, L., & Kuykendall, L. E. (2017) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2017.1291850 · Cited by 38
Understanding the Role of Cultural Intelligence in Individual Creativity
Yunlu, D. G., Clapp‐Smith, R., & Shaffer, M. A. (2017) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2017.1360070 · Cited by 34
“Furthermore, curiosity denotes a high degree of receptivity and willingness to engage with novel stimuli (Kashdan et al., 2009).”
BackgroundThe generative role of curiosity in soft skills development for contemporary VUCA environments
Horstmeyer, A. (2020) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/jocm-08-2019-0250 · Cited by 40
Silvia, P. J. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55509-6_5 · Cited by 41
Self-citationRecognition of curiosity using eye movement analysis
Hoppe, S., Loetscher, T., Morey, S. A., & Bulling, A. (2015) · ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) · doi:10.1145/2800835.2800910 · Cited by 34
“Ground truth was established by common questionnaires [8, 6].”
BackgroundMethodAssociations between ADHD traits and self-reported strengths in the general population
Schippers, L. M., Greven, C. U., & Hoogman, M. (2024) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152461 · Cited by 44
SAHIN, S. H., & Sarıçam, H. (2015) · Educational Process International Journal · doi:10.12973/edupij.2015.412.1 · Cited by 33
“Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI): Curiosity level was measured by using CEI-II as developed by Kashdan et al. (2009), and consists of ten items (e.”
MethodNa, P., Tsai, J., Southwick, S., & Pietrzak, R. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine (1967) · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114409 · Cited by 27
Deep Learning Models for Serendipity Recommendations: A Survey and New Perspectives
Fu, Z., Niu, X., & Maher, M. L. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3605145 · Cited by 33
“They used the well-established Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II [103], which has 10 questions to evaluate users’ curiosity levels.”
MethodFrom Likert scales to images: Validating a novel creativity measure with image based response scales
Leutner, F., Yearsley, A., Codreanu, S., Borenstein, Y., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.007 · Cited by 39
“85, construct validity, discrimination, desirable breadth of difficulty (Kashdan et al., 2009), and predictive validity for task performance (Kashdan, Rose, & Fincham, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNichter, B., Stein, M. B., Monteith, L. L., Herzog, S., Holliday, R. P., Hill, M. L., Norman, S. B., Krystal, J. H., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2021) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12822 · Cited by 34
“…adapted from the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (Russell et al., 1980); α = 0.78 High perceived stigma about mental healthcare Perceived stigma about mental healthcare was assessed using the Perceived Stigma and Barriers to Care Scale (Britt et al., 2008 Kashdan et al., 2009), respectively.”
InfluentialStraus, E., Norman, S. B., Haller, M. M., Southwick, S. M., Hamblen, J. L., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2018) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.011 · Cited by 32
Potwarka, L. R., Snelgrove, R., Drewery, D., Bakhsh, J. T., & Wood, L. M. (2019) · Sport Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.smr.2019.03.002 · Cited by 32
Testing the Information‐Seeking Theory of Openness/Intellect
Jach, H. K., & Smillie, L. D. (2020) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2271 · Cited by 36
“High scorers on openness/intellect tend to be curious about the world (e.g., Kashdan et al., 2009; Kashdan et al., 2018; Kashdan, Rose, & Fincham, 2004; McCrae & Costa, 1997), creative (McCrae, 1987), artistic (Kaufman et al., 2016), intel- lectual (Mussel, 2013), and intelligent (DeYoung, Quilty,…”
BackgroundBuilding a Common Framework for IIR Evaluation
Hall, M. M., & Toms, E. G. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40802-1_3 · Cited by 32
“User-individual Differences: depending on the study objectives, there is a large variety of user characteristics that one might observe, control or test, such as Cognitive Style [20], Need for Cognition [3], Curiosity [9], and Openness to Experience [14].”
BackgroundJovanović, V., & Gavrilov‐Jerković, V. (2013) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.12084 · Cited by 32
Mussel, P., & Spengler, M. (2015) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.01.002 · Cited by 34
“Sojka and Deeter-Schmelz (2008) found need for cognition to significantly predict self-rated sales performance (.”
BackgroundInfluentialTullett, A. M., Hart, W., Feinberg, M., Fetterman, Z., & Gottlieb, S. (2016) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.018 · Cited by 31
“At this point, participants completed the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory II (Kashdan et al., 2009) and filled out demographic information.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Role of Curiosity and Interest in Learning and Motivation
Shin, D. D., Lee, H. J., Lee, G., & Kim, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316823279.020 · Cited by 31
Inside banks' information and control systems: Post-decision surprise and corporate disruption
Eastburn, R., & Boland, R. J. (2015) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2015.05.001 · Cited by 34
Open or opposed to unknowns: How do curious people think and feel about uncertainty?
Whitecross, W. M., & Smithson, M. J. (2023) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112210 · Cited by 34
Promoting Green Fashion Consumption Through Digital Nudges in Recommender Systems
Cossatin, A. G., Mauro, N., & Ardissono, L. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3349710 · Cited by 29
“H2 Users’ curiosity (CEI-II level [43]) positively impacts the user experience with the user interface.”
BackgroundHow hope measures up: Hope predicts school variables beyond growth mindset and school belonging
Dixson, D. D. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00975-y · Cited by 31
McGuire, A. P., Fogle, B. M., Tsai, J., Southwick, S. M., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.01.020 · Cited by 30
“Emotion, 8(2), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.281 McGuire et al., 2021 (Postprint) 13 McGuire et al., 2021 (Postprint) 14 Conscientiousness Score on Conscientiousness subscale of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory Emotional stability Score on Emotional Stability subscale of the Ten-Item Personality Inv…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe effect of information gap and uncertainty on curiosity and its resolution
Singh, A., & Manjaly, J. A. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2021.1908311 · Cited by 29
“Additional evidence of validity would require the inter-individual differences in Q press behaviour in missing letters task to be associated with participant scores on the trait curiosity scales (e.g. Kashdan et al., 2009; Litman & Jimerson, 2004).”
BackgroundBeing unconventional: The impact of unconventional packaging messages on impulsive purchases
Das, M., Balaji, M., Paul, S., & Saha, V. (2023) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21865 · Cited by 29
Smedegaard, C. V. (2022) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2022.741478 · Cited by 31
“Both early (Berlyne, 1960) and more contemporary research (Kashdan et al., 2009; Kashdan and Silvia, 2009) on curiosity denote the ambiguity of novelty as both an anxiety-inducing and interest-eliciting experience; while novelty [framed as the possibility to learn or experience something unknown…”
BackgroundApplying Silvia's model of interest to academic text: Is there a third appraisal?
Connelly, D. A. (2011) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.007 · Cited by 28
Straus, E., Norman, S. B., Tripp, J. C., Pitts, M., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2019) · Chronic Stress · doi:10.1177/2470547019872172 · Cited by 30
“39 ; (5) curiosity (i.e., “I frequently find myself looking for new opportunities to grow as a person [e.g., information, people, resources”]) 40 ; and (6) community integration (i.e., “I feel well integrated in my community”).”
Huck, J. T., Day, E. A., Lin, L., Jorgensen, A. G., Westlin, J., & Hardy, J. H. (2020) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878119895557 · Cited by 27
“Individuals with higher levels of EC experience more intense states of curiosity across a broader range of situations, which promote engagement and exploratory behavior (Kashdan et al., 2009; Naylor, 1981).”
BackgroundAftab, A., Lam, J. A., Thomas, M. L., Daly, R., Lee, E., & Jeste, D. V. (2022) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.06.023 · Cited by 28
Cossatin, A. G., Mauro, N., Ferrero, F., & Ardissono, L. (2025) · Information Technology & Tourism · doi:10.1007/s40558-025-00312-8 · Cited by 27
“4 Moreo-4 ver, they answered the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI-II) questionnaire (Kashdan et al. 2009), which we used to determine the impact of people’s curiosity on the user experience with the three user interfaces.”
Aghababaei, N., Wasserman, J. A., & Hatami, J. (2013) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2012.731026 · Cited by 27
“…a factor analysis of Persian translation of these measures replicated the discrete six-factor structure of the HEXACO-60 (Palahang et al., 2010) Curiosity and Exploration Inventory We used the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI-II) to measure trait curiosity (Kashdan et al., 2009).”
MethodApathy in aging: Are lack of interest and lack of initiative dissociable?
Esposito, F., Rochat, L., der Linden, A. J. V., Lekeu, F., Charnallet, A., & der Linden, M. V. (2013) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2013.09.002 · Cited by 27
Dimensions, Measures, and Contexts in Psychological Investigations of Curiosity: A Scoping Review
Yow, Y. J., Ramsay, J. E., Lin, P. K. F., & Marsh, N. V. (2022) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs12120493 · Cited by 30
“Prior work has shown that curiosity is linked to multiple positive outcomes, such as happiness, meaning in life, distress tolerance, and satisfying social relationships [1].”
BackgroundInfluentialWhitecross, W. M., & Smithson, M. J. (2023) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112310 · Cited by 30
Deprivation and discovery motives determine how it feels to be curious
Noordewier, M. K., & van Dijk, E. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.017 · Cited by 30
“These findings mimic trait curiosity scales that differentiate between curiosity as feeling interested versus curiosity as feeling deprived [1,19,21,22,26].”
Daily Stressor-Related Negative Mood and its Associations with Flourishing and Daily Curiosity
Drake, A., Doré, B., Falk, E. B., Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Lydon‐Staley, D. M. (2021) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-021-00404-2 · Cited by 27
Na, P. J., Norman, S. B., Nichter, B., Hill, M. L., Rosen, M. I., Petrakis, I. L., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2021) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108818 · Cited by 26
Cross-national cultural competency among Taiwanese international students.
Wang, L., Wang, K. T., Heppner, P. P., & Chuang, C.-C. (2016) · Journal of Diversity in Higher Education · doi:10.1037/dhe0000020 · Cited by 26
Wang, N., Chen, L., & Yang, Y. (2020) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3340631.3394863 · Cited by 25
“…given that curiosity has been found significantly correlated with users’ personality traits (such as openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, and neuroticism [14]), we also included the Big-Five factor model [10] to identify the five major personality traits’ respective influences.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialVracheva, V. P., Moussetis, R., & Abu-Rahma, A. (2019) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-019-00140-8 · Cited by 32
Psychometric of the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-Ii in Indonesia
Setyowati, A., Chung, M., Yusuf, A., & Haksama, S. (2020) · Journal of Public Health Research · doi:10.4081/jphr.2020.1745 · Cited by 24
Li, P., & Tuzhilin, A. (2023) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.0053 · Cited by 24
Curious people are less affected by social rejection
Kawamoto, T., Ura, M., & Hiraki, K. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.006 · Cited by 26
CURUMIM: A Serendipitous Recommender System for Tourism Based on Human Curiosity
dos Santos, A. M., Sebastiá, L., & Ferreira, R. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) · doi:10.1109/ictai.2017.00124 · Cited by 24
“2The average of the degree of curiosity in an adult is 33 [25] places belonging to UHI are automatically considered similar because they are at a distance equal to 0.”
BackgroundMethodCharacterization of Vulnerable and Resilient Spanish Adolescents in Their Developmental Contexts
Moreno, C., García‐Moya, I., Rivera, F., & Valverde, P. R. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00983 · Cited by 25
Ma, J. (2023) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104236 · Cited by 23
Rich, R. M., Ogden, J., & Morison, L. (2021) · International Journal of Workplace Health Management · doi:10.1108/ijwhm-04-2020-0046 · Cited by 22
Self-curiosity: Definition and measurement
Aschieri, F., Durosini, I., & Smith, J. D. (2018) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2018.1543728 · Cited by 22
“related to anger, depression, or anxiety (Kashdan et al., 2009; Litman & Jimerson, 2004).”
BackgroundCareer Decision Self‐Efficacy of Asian American Students: The Role of Curiosity and Ethnic Identity
Kim, Y. H., & Choi, N. (2019) · The Career Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/cdq.12161 · Cited by 22
CURIOSITY TOWARDS STEM EDUCATION: A QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS
Ahmad, J., & Siew, N. M. (2021) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/21.20.289 · Cited by 22
“The CQ-STEM instrument is the fine-tuned item of CEI-II adapted from Kashdan (2009) with STEM education element items constructed by researchers.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUser Bias in Beyond-Accuracy Measurement of Recommendation Algorithms
Wang, N., & Chen, L. (2021) · Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3460231.3474244 · Cited by 22
“…each participant was also asked to fill out some demographic information (i.e., gender and age) and answer two psychological inventories (i.e., Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) [14] for the big-five personality traits, and Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI-II) [21] for curiosity).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKwok, S. Y. C. L., Gu, M., & Kwok, K. (2022) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105629 · Cited by 22
Lavoie, R. V., & Main, K. (2022) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-05-2019-0415 · Cited by 25
Curiosity for information predicts wellbeing mediated by loneliness during COVID-19 pandemic
Vermeer, A. B. L., Muth, A.-K., Terenzi, D., & Park, S. Q. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11924-z · Cited by 30
AlShamsi, S. S. S., Ahmad, K. Z., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2022) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-05-2022-3267 · Cited by 28
Booker, J. A., & Perlin, J. D. (2020) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2020.1716048 · Cited by 23
“Participants completed the Curiosity and Exploration-II Inventory (Kashdan et al., 2009;M= 4.87, SD = 1.06; α = .88).”
MethodInfluentialExploring the Relationship between Mindfulness and Innovation in Engineering Students
Rieken, B., Schar, M., Shapiro, S. L., Gilmartin, S. K., & Sheppard, S. (2018) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--28341 · Cited by 21
“The four items represent the top four loading items of the five-item “embracing” subscale of the CEI-II, measuring “a willingness to embrace the novel, uncertain, and unpredictable nature of everyday life” (p. 955).”
MethodResultInfluentialTong, K., Chan, Y. N., Cheng, X., Cheon, B. K., Ellefson, M. R., Fauziana, R., Feng, S., Fischer, N. L., Gulyás, B. Z., Hoo, N. P., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286208 · Cited by 33
Curious and Persistent, but not Consistent: Self‐regulation Traits and Creativity
Lin, S., Ivčević, Z., Kashdan, T. B., & Kaufman, S. B. (2024) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.638 · Cited by 24
“…stimuli (Kashdan et al., 2018) and it can be described as a dimension in the personality domain of openness to experience (correlations between dimensions of curiosity and total openness range from .15 to .60 across studies; Kashdan et al., 2009, 2018; Mussel, Spengler, Litman, & Schuler, 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationUniversity Student Satisfaction and Skill Acquisition: Evidence from the Undergraduate Dissertation
Roget, F. M., Esparís, P. F., & Rozas, E. V. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10020029 · Cited by 21
“Curiosity can be considered as a affective personality dimension of learning [36] and as [33] points out “Among other adaptive outcomes, curiosity is suspected to play a role in the development of intelligence, wisdom, happiness, meaning in life, distress tolerance, and satisfying and engaging social relationships” (p.”
BackgroundMethodZainal, N. H., & Newman, M. G. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.001 · Cited by 23
Interested in Different Things or in Different Ways?
Fayn, K., Silvia, P. J., MacCann, C., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2017) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000243 · Cited by 20
“While theoretically tied with other measures of intellectual engagement (DeYoung, 2015), the measurement of intellect is different from measures that assess similar constructs such as the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory (Kashdan et al., 2009), Typical Intellectual Engagement (Goff & Ackerman, 1992), and another co…”
MethodSelf-citationKaczmarek, L. D., Kashdan, T. B., Drążkowski, D., Bujacz, A., & Goodman, F. R. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.032 · Cited by 21
“The 10-item Curiosity and Exploration Inventory–II (Kashdan et al., 2009) included five items assessing seeking out new knowledge and experiences (e.g., ‘‘Everywhere I go, I am out looking for new things or experiences’’) and five assessing the willingness to tolerate the novelty and uncertainty…”
InfluentialSelf-citationRisk management and managerial mindset
Eastburn, R., & Sharland, A. (2017) · The Journal of Risk Finance · doi:10.1108/jrf-09-2016-0114 · Cited by 28
People’s naïve belief about curiosity and interest: A qualitative study
Aslan, S., Fastrich, G. M., Donnellan, E., Jones, D. J. W., & Murayama, K. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256632 · Cited by 24
Design and Evaluation of a Public Installation of an Eye-Gaze System
Lin, C., Yang, H., Lay, Y., & Yang, S.-W. (2011) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2011.567370 · Cited by 20
“Previous research also has indicated that personality traits such as curiosity (Almeida, Kashdan, Coelho, Albino-Teixeira, & Soares-da-Silva, 2008; Kashdan & Steger, 2007; Kashdan et al., 2009) may increase a subject’s likelihood of participation.”
BackgroundSippel, L. M., Mota, N. P., Kachadourian, L. K., Krystal, J. H., Southwick, S. M., Harpaz‐Rotem, I., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2016) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.040 · Cited by 21
Thriving Teams and Change Agility: Leveraging a Collective State to Create Organization Agility
Keister, A. C. C. (2014) · Research in organizational change and development · doi:10.1108/s0897-301620140000022007 · Cited by 21
The Role of Openness and Entrepreneurial Curiosity in Company's Growth
Jeraj, M., Marič, M., Todorović, I., Čudanov, M., & Komazec, S. (2015) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 20
Green Workplace Behaviors: Can Employees Make the Difference?
Carbone, E., Feraco, T., Innocenti, I., Musicanti, M., Volpe, P., & Meneghetti, C. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su162411188 · Cited by 19
Partnering with AI for instrument development: Possibilities and pitfalls
Beghetto, R. A., Ross, W., Karwowski, M., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2024) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101121 · Cited by 19
Vela, J. C., Sparrow, G. S., Ikonomopoulos, J., Gonzalez, S. L., & Rodriguez, B. (2016) · Journal of Hispanic Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1538192716628958 · Cited by 19
“Finally, students were given a packet with the following survey instruments: Short Grit Scale (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009), CEI-II (Kashdan et al., 2009), LOT (Scheier & Carver, 1985), GQ-6 (McCullough et al., 2002), Pan-Hispanic Familism Scale (Villarreal et al., 2005), and SLWS (Diener et al., 2001).”
BackgroundMethodRoadmap of Designing Cognitive Metrics for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Hsiao, J. H.-W., Ngai, H. H. T., Qiu, L., Yang, Y., & Cao, C. C. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.01737 · Cited by 45
“Other subjective measures of curiosity include the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory (CEI; Kashdan et al., 2009) and the Perceptual Curiosity Scale”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExploratory preferences explain the human fascination for imaginary worlds in fictional stories
Dubourg, E., Thouzeau, V., de Dampierre, C., Mogoutov, A., & Baumard, N. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-35151-2 · Cited by 21
Raffaelli, Q., Malusa, R., de Stefano, N.-A., Andrews, E. S., Grilli, M. D., Mills, C., Zabelina, D. L., & Andrews‐Hanna, J. R. (2023) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2023.2227477 · Cited by 19
“Upon arrival, participants first completed the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II survey (see below for details about this and other tasks), along with other surveys not analyzed in this manuscript.”
Lee, S. A. (2024) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/10963480231220274 · Cited by 22
“Curiosity was triggered by novel stimuli (Kashdan et al., 2009), information from in-group posts (Thomas & Vinuales, 2017), and sensory information (Park et al., 2015).”
Vela, J. C., Sparrow, G. S., Whittenberg, J. F., & Rodriguez, B. (2018) · Journal of Employment Counseling · doi:10.1002/joec.12070 · Cited by 18
Jeraj, M., & Marič, M. (2013) · Organizacija · doi:10.2478/orga-2013-0027 · Cited by 25
“A growing number of recent findings (e.g. Gallagher and Lopez, 2007; Kashdan and Steger, 2007; Kashdan et al., 2009) demonstrated that curiosity was positively associated with various measures of subjective, psychological and social well-being (Jovanovic and Brdaric, 2012).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Kashdan, T. B., Gallagher, M. W., Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Breen, W. E., Terhar, D., & Steger, M. F.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- Colorado State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kashdan, Todd B.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 987-998
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2770180
- OpenAlex
- W2107615426
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 11.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH073937)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- trait curiosity, scale development, factor structure, construct validity, item response theory, psychological flexibility, positive affect, well-being, openness to experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review