The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The curiosity and exploration inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics
Open accessAbstract
Given curiosity's fundamental role in motivation, learning, and well-being, we sought to refine the measurement of trait curiosity with an improved version of the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory (CEI; Kashdan, Rose, & Fincham, 2004). A preliminary pool of 36 items was administered to 311 undergraduate students, who also completed measures of emotion, emotion regulation, personality, and well-being. Factor analyses indicated a two factor model-motivation to seek out knowledge and new experiences (Stretching; 5 items) and a willingness to embrace the novel, uncertain, and unpredictable nature of everyday life (Embracing; 5 items). In two additional samples (ns = 150 and 119), we cross-validated this factor structure and provided initial evidence for construct validity. This includes positive correlations with personal growth, openness to experience, autonomy, purpose in life, self-acceptance, psychological flexibility, positive affect, and positive social relations, among others. Applying item response theory (IRT) to these samples (n = 578), we showed that the items have good discrimination and a desirable breadth of difficulty. The item information functions and test information function were centered near zero, indicating that the scale assesses the mid-range of the latent curiosity trait most reliably. The findings thus far provide good evidence for the psychometric properties of the 10-item CEI-II.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788 · cited 1×
“Current guidelines regarding model fit indices (Brown, 2006; Hu & Bentler, 1999; Kline, 2004) suggest that CFA/ NNFI values P.95, and RMSEA/SRMR values 6.08 indicate good model fit.”
BackgroundInfluentialRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599 · cited 1×
“…that are identical to curiosity: ''Perhaps no single phenomenon reflects the positive potential of human nature as much as intrinsic motivation, the inherent tendency to seek out novelty and challenges, to extend and exercise one's capacities, to explore, and to learn " (Ryan & Deci, 2000, p. 70).”
BackgroundPrinciples and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210 · cited 2×
“Besides the social benefits linked to curiosity, other psychological needs for autonomy and self-acceptance ([Deci and Ryan, 2000] and [Ryff, 1989]) were more likely to be satisfied for highly curious people.”
BackgroundDevelopment and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266 · cited 1×
“** p < .001. imation (RMSEA; Steiger & Lind, 1980), the standardized root mean residual (SRMR; Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1996), the non-normed fit index (NNFI; Bentler & Bonett, 1980), and the comparative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990).”
BackgroundSignificance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015 · cited 1×
“** p < .001. imation (RMSEA; Steiger & Lind, 1980), the standardized root mean residual (SRMR; Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1996), the non-normed fit index (NNFI; Bentler & Bonett, 1980), and the comparative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990).”
BackgroundConfirmatory factor analysis for applied research
Brown, T. A. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2769 · Cited by 15,621 · cited 3×
“Current guidelines regarding model fit indices (Brown, 2006; Hu & Bentler, 1999; Kline, 2004) suggest that CFA/ NNFI values P.95, and RMSEA/SRMR values 6.08 indicate good model fit.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Berlyne, 1967, Arousal and reinforcement, Vol. 15, 1
- Tomkins, 1962, Vol. 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Into the unknown: A review and synthesis of contemporary models involving uncertainty
Carleton, R. N. (2016) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,104
Kashdan, T. B., Stiksma, M. C., Disabato, D. J., McKnight, P. E., Bekier, J., Kaji, J., & Lazarus, R. (2017) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.011 · Cited by 544
“…psychometric properties of measures such as the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II - the embracing of stress in novel and challenging situations subscale had smaller correlations with distress and healthy emotion regulation strategies than the stretching subscale; Kashdan et al., 2009).”
InfluentialSelf-citationDifferent types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being
Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Short, J. L., & Jarden, A. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000209 · Cited by 583
“Despite the popularity of the hedonia–eudaimonia distinction within the well-being literature, there is skepticism about its empirical support and theoretical utility (Coyne, 2013; Kashdan et al., 2008, Kashdan et al., 2009; Sheldon, 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Light vs. Dark Triad of Personality: Contrasting Two Very Different Profiles of Human Nature
Kaufman, S. B., Yaden, D. B., Hyde, E., & Tsukayama, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00467 · Cited by 446
Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Routledge, C., Arndt, J., Hepper, E. G., & Zhou, X. (2015) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2014.10.001 · Cited by 348
“…ordinary) event condition reported greater growth-related self-perceptions (i.e., self-expansion, curiosity, inclination toward new experiences; Kashdan et al., 2009) and stronger growth-related behavioral intentions (i.e., to engage in novel, self-expansive activities; Luke, Sedikides, &…”
BackgroundGrossnickle, E. M. (2014) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9294-y · Cited by 365
“In a few definitions, the need for knowledge or information was described as not just an identification of the gap, but also a propensity toward seeking such gaps (Kashdan et al. 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPosttraumatic Stress Disorder in the US Veteran Population
Wisco, B. E., Marx, B. P., Wolf, E. J., Miller, M. W., Southwick, S. M., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2014) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.14m09328 · Cited by 322
Process Account of Curiosity and Interest: A Reward-Learning Perspective
Murayama, K., FitzGibbon, L., & Sakaki, M. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09499-9 · Cited by 334
“As indicated in our paper, there are a number of trait-level scales that aimed to understand the individual differences in different aspects of curiosity and interest (Kashdan et al. 2009; Litman 2008).”
BackgroundUnderstanding the need for novelty from the perspective of self-determination theory
González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, Á., Sierra, A. C., Ferriz, R., & Hagger, M. S. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.036 · Cited by 301
Metacognitive model of mindfulness
Jankowski, T., & Holas, P. (2014) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.005 · Cited by 276
“Both researchers studying mindfulness and psychologists exploring curiosity associate these two phenomena (Bishop et al., 2004; Kashdan et al., 2009).”
BackgroundDigital-only banking experience: Insights from gen Y and gen Z
Windasari, N. A., Kusumawati, N., Larasati, N. A., & Amelia, R. P. (2022) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2022.100170 · Cited by 275
Kashdan, T. B., Weeks, J. W., & Savostyanova, A. A. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.012 · Cited by 258
Self-citationLinks between intellectual humility and acquiring knowledge
Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., Haggard, M. C., LaBouff, J. P., & Rowatt, W. C. (2020) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2019.1579359 · Cited by 239
“The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (Kashdan et al., 2009) was used to assess trait”
MethodBluth, K., & Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A. (2017) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.04.001 · Cited by 296
Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., & Kashdan, T. B. (2018) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12382 · Cited by 243
Self-citationKarwowski, M. (2012) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v8i4.513 · Cited by 221
“Kashdan and Silvia (2009) defined curiosity as follows: Curiosity can be defined as the recognition, pursuit, and intense desire to explore novel, challenging, and uncertain events.”
InfluentialPietrzak, R. H., & Cook, J. M. (2013) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22083 · Cited by 215
“Score on single-item measure of curiosity/exploration from Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II;[66] “I frequently find myself looking for new opportunities to grow as a person (e.”
BackgroundAn IRT analysis of motive questionnaires: The Unified Motive Scales
Schönbrodt, F., & Gerstenberg, F. (2012) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.08.010 · Cited by 183
“…with strangers than with familiar people”) had a uniqueness of .85 and did not load substantially on any factor, which could point to a distinct curiosity motive beyond the five motives represented by the factor solution (Gubler & Bischof, 1991; Kashdan et al., 2009; Schneider & Schmalt, 2000).”
BackgroundConner, T. S., Brookie, K. L., Carr, A. C., Mainvil, L. A., & Vissers, M. C. M. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171206 · Cited by 207
Kashdan, T. B., Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., & McKnight, P. E. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109836 · Cited by 234
Self-citationKrejtz, K., Duchowski, A. T., Szmidt, T., Krejtz, I., Perilli, F. G., Pires, A. C., Vilaró, A., & Villalobos, N. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Applied Perception · doi:10.1145/2834121 · Cited by 205
“The curiosity score (CEI-II) was tested as a between-subject factor and stimuli as a within-subject factor.”
MethodInfluentialEye Movements During Everyday Behavior Predict Personality Traits
Hoppe, S., Loetscher, T., Morey, S. A., & Bulling, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00105 · Cited by 186
“, 2004); and 3) the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory (CEI-II), a 10-item questionnaire assessing trait curiosity (Kashdan et al., 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-Compassion: A Potential Path to Adolescent Resilience and Positive Exploration
Bluth, K., Mullarkey, M. C., & Lathren, C. (2018) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1125-1 · Cited by 231
“Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for total score is .86; the stretching subscale α= .80 and embracing subscale α= .79 (Kashdan et al. 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialSyed, I., Butler, J. C., Smith, R. M., & Cao, X. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109758 · Cited by 172
Contributing high quantity and quality knowledge to online Q & A communities
Lou, J., Fang, Y., Lim, K. H., & Peng, J. Z. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22750 · Cited by 176
Conner, T. S., Brookie, K. L., Richardson, A. C., & Polak, M. (2014) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12113 · Cited by 183
Introducing the construct curiosity for predicting job performance
Mussel, P. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1809 · Cited by 181
“Furthermore, epistemic curiosity is uncorrelated with anger and depression and uncorrelated or slightly negatively correlated with anxiety (Kashdan et al., 2009; Litman & Spielberger, 2003; Litman & Jimerson, 2004; Litman & Pezzo, 2007).”
BackgroundAllying with AI? Reactions toward human-based, AI/ML-based, and augmented hiring processes
Gonzalez, M. F., Liu, W., Shirase, L., Tomczak, D. L., Lobbe, C. E., Justenhoven, R. T., & Martin, N. R. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107179 · Cited by 180
How Serendipity Improves User Satisfaction with Recommendations? A Large-Scale User Evaluation
Chen, L., Yang, Y., Wang, N., Yang, K., & Yuan, Q. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313469 · Cited by 146
“Thus, in our survey, we asked the participants to respond to a popular curiosity instrument, Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI-II) [16] (an improved version of the original Curiosity and Exploration Inventory (CEI) [17]), because it was proven capable of assessing individual differences…”
BackgroundMethodClifton, J. D. W., Baker, J. D., Park, C. L., Yaden, D. B., Clifton, A. B. W., Terni, P., Miller, J. L., Zeng, G., Giorgi, S., Schwartz, H. A., et al. (2018) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000639 · Cited by 155
“Following primals items, 562 participants completed measures of BIG 5 personality traits (44-item BFI; John, Donahue, & Kentle, 1991); life satisfaction (5-item SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985); depression, anxiety, and stress (21-item DASS-21; Antony, Bieling, Cox, Enns, & Swinson, 1998); positive emoti…”
Eye movements reveal epistemic curiosity in human observers
Baranès, A., Oudeyer, P., & Gottlieb, J. P. (2015) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2015.10.009 · Cited by 136
“The second questionnaire was the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory II (Kashdan et al., 2009) which measures curiosity and exploration using 2 dimensions: interest for novelty, challenge and absorption (full engagement in specific activities).”
MethodCiarrochi, J., Atkins, P. W. B., Hayes, L. L., Sahdra, B. K., & Parker, P. D. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01561 · Cited by 169
“…discoverer skill can be roughly mapped to adaptive expressions of openness to experience (Headey and Wearing, 1989; Davey et al., 2003; Heaven and Ciarrochi, 2012) and curiosity (Kashdan et al., 2009), and low discoverer skill can be mapped to maladaptive forms of sensation seeking (Roberti, 2004).”
BackgroundIntellect: A theoretical framework for personality traits related to intellectual achievements.
Mussel, P. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031918 · Cited by 133
“Similar conceptualizations have been made by Kashdan et al. (2009), who proposed a two-factor model, one related to seeking out knowledge and new experiences and the other related to a willingness to manage and embrace the tension that often arises when confronting novelty and uncertainty.”
BackgroundCuriosity in old age: A possible key to achieving adaptive aging
Sakaki, M., Yagi, A., & Murayama, K. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.007 · Cited by 147
Curious eyes: Individual differences in personality predict eye movement behavior in scene-viewing
Risko, E. F., Anderson, N., Lanthier, S. N., & Kingstone, A. F. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.014 · Cited by 127
Early childhood curiosity and kindergarten reading and math academic achievement
Shah, P., Weeks, H. M., Richards, B. J., & Kaciroti, N. (2018) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/s41390-018-0039-3 · Cited by 152
“While curiosity traits are thought to be highly heritable (20) and include an openness to experiences, desire for novelty, and willingness to embrace the unexpected (21), the expression of curiosity is also thought to be situational (i.”
BackgroundSilvia, P. J., & Christensen, A. P. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.013 · Cited by 120
Self-citationConnections between curiosity, flow and creativity
Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109555 · Cited by 119
Brief assessment of schizotypy: Developing short forms of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales
Winterstein, B. P., Silvia, P. J., Kwapil, T. R., Kaufman, J. C., Reiter‐Palmon, R., & Wigert, B. G. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.027 · Cited by 117
“…complement the HEXACO, we included several narrow traits, particularly measures of trait curiosity (the revised Curiosity and Exploration Inventory; Kashdan et al., 2009), sensation seeking (a brief scale developed by Hoyle, Stephenson, Palmgreen, Lorch, & Donohew, 2002), and hypomania (the…”
Self-citationEntropy-based statistical analysis of eye movement transitions
Krejtz, K., Szmidt, T., Duchowski, A. T., & Krejtz, I. (2014) · ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA) · doi:10.1145/2578153.2578176 · Cited by 114
“The main independent variables were experimental condition (positive vs. neutral mood), curiosity factor based on median split of the CEI-II scores, and subjective attractiveness of the artwork (low vs. high— answers from 1 to 3 were coded as ’low’ and answers from 4 to 5 as ’high’ attractiveness).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCultivating an understanding of curiosity as a seed for creativity
Gross, M. E., Zedelius, C. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.015 · Cited by 114
“General curiosity was measured using the curiosity and exploration inventory-II [54]; creative self-efficacy was measured using the short scale of creative self (SSCS; Karwowski, [1 ]); and creative imagination was measured using the Imagination index [55].”
MethodMeasures of curiosity: A literature review
Wagstaff, M. F., Flores, G. L., Ahmed, R., & Villanueva, S. (2020) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.21417 · Cited by 124
Exploring nostalgia's influence on psychological growth
Baldwin, M., & Landau, M. J. (2014) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2013.772320 · Cited by 106
“Second, we included the Exploration Inventory (EI; Green & Campbell, 2000) to assess growth-oriented behavioral intentions.”
MethodFrom relief to surprise: Dual control of epistemic curiosity in the human brain
Ligneul, R., Mermillod, M., & Morisseau, T. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.038 · Cited by 105
“trade-off varies greatly across individuals and recent studies have suggested that tolerance to uncertainty is a key personality trait underlying this variability (Kashdan et al., 2009; Litman, 2010).”
A Meta‐Analysis of the Relationship between Curiosity and Creativity
Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2019) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.421 · Cited by 104
Personality and boredom proneness in the prediction of creativity and curiosity
Hunter, J. A., Abraham, E. H., Hunter, A. G., Goldberg, L. C., & Eastwood, J. D. (2016) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.08.002 · Cited by 101
Isaacs, K. H., Mota, N. P., Tsai, J., Harpaz‐Rotem, I., Cook, J. M., Kirwin, P. D., Krystal, J. H., Southwick, S. M., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2016) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.10.017 · Cited by 106
“…1994) rating 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree .729 Score on single-item measure of curiosity/exploratin from Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (Kashdan et al., 2009); “I frequently find myself looking for new opportunities to grow as a person (e.g., information, people, resources”)…”
BackgroundKashdan, T. B., Sherman, R. A., Yarbro, J., & Funder, D. C. (2012) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00796.x · Cited by 101
Self-citationThe motivational potency of nostalgia: The future is called yesterday
Sedikides, C., & Wildschut, T. (2019) · Advances in motivation science · doi:10.1016/bs.adms.2019.05.001 · Cited by 104
Elnadi, M., & Gheith, M. H. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101236 · Cited by 116
Personality, Effective Goal-Striving, and Enhanced Well-Being
Sheldon, K. M., Jose, P. E., Kashdan, T. B., & Jarden, A. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215573211 · Cited by 100
“This research has shown that psychologically healthy and well-adapted individuals are higher in Grit, defined as manifesting goal-perseverance and resilience in the face of adversity (Duckworth, Peterson, Matthews, & Kelly, 2007); Gratitude, the disposition and ability to feel appreciative of benefits received (Emmons…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSilvia, P. J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0010 · Cited by 96
Self-citationPlayful work design: Conceptualization, measurement, and validity
Scharp, Y. S., Bakker, A. B., Breevaart, K., Kruup, K., & Uusberg, A. (2021) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267211070996 · Cited by 115
“Curiosity describes the pursuit, recognition, and desire to explore novel, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous events (Kashdan et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodHill, P. L., Turiano, N. A., Mroczek, D. K., & Roberts, B. W. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611433888 · Cited by 100
“Past work has suggested that creative individuals score higher on social contribution (Kashdan et al., 2009).”
Within‐person variability in curiosity during daily life and associations with well‐being
Lydon‐Staley, D. M., Zurn, P., & Bassett, D. S. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12515 · Cited by 84
“Trait Curiosity was measured using the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory‐II (CEI‐II; Kashdan et al., 2009).”
Fanning, J. R., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.07.015 · Cited by 97
“(1994) Curiosity and exploration “I frequently find myself looking for new opportunities to grow as a person” 1 Kashdan et al. (2009)”
BackgroundAn Exploration of Some Antecedents and Consequences of Creative Self‐Efficacy among College Students
Puente‐Díaz, R., & Cavazos‐Arroyo, J. (2016) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.149 · Cited by 90
How serious is the ‘carelessness’ problem on Mechanical Turk?
Aruguete, M. S., Huynh, H. P., Browne, B. L., Jurs, B. S., Flint, E., & McCutcheon, L. E. (2019) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2018.1563966 · Cited by 89
“We did something similar on the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI-II; Kashdan et al., 2009).”
MethodWork curiosity: A new lens for understanding employee creativity
Chang, Y.-Y., & Shih, H.-Y. (2019) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.10.005 · Cited by 88
Puente‐Díaz, R., & Cavazos‐Arroyo, J. (2017) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2017.1360067 · Cited by 88
“For this investigation, the total trait curiosity score was sued, which has shown to be reliable (α = .83) and valid (Kashdan et al., 2009).”
MethodInfluentialDecius, J., Schaper, N., & Seifert, A. (2021) · Vocations and Learning · doi:10.1007/s12186-021-09265-5 · Cited by 122
Anderson, C. L., Dixson, D. D., Monroy, M., & Keltner, D. J. (2019) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12524 · Cited by 91
Koerner, N., Mejia, T., & Kusec, A. (2017) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2016.1211172 · Cited by 81
“…Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI-II; Kashdan et al., 2009) is a self-report measure that assesses individual differences in trait curiosity, in particular a person’s general tendency to embrace everyday novel or uncertain situations and to seek out new experiences (Kashdan et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDaume, J., & Hüttl‐Maack, V. (2019) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1633163 · Cited by 82
“…curiosity has been used to describe both the desire of exploration resulting from an inherent trait, which suggests a rather stable tendency to be curious (ie trait curiosity; Day 1971; Kashdan et al. 2009), and a specific state invoked from an external environmental trigger (Grossnickle 2016).”
Peng, M. Y., Xu, Y., & Xu, C. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13302 · Cited by 81
Kashdan, T. B., DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. S., Silvia, P. J., Lambert, N. M., Fincham, F. D., Farmer, A. S., & Keller, P. S. (2012) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00783.x · Cited by 85
“The CEI-II contains two 5-item factors: stretching (e.g., “I actively seek as much information as I can in new situations”; α = .88; M = 3.38, SD = 0.94) and embracing (e.g., “Everywhere I go, I am out looking for new things or experiences”; α = .84; M = 3.00, SD = 0.91).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationPersonality Strengths as Resilience: A One‐Year Multiwave Study
Goodman, F. R., Disabato, D. J., Kashdan, T. B., & Machell, K. A. (2016) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12250 · Cited by 80
“The 10-item Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI-II; Kashdan et al., 2009) measures tendencies to seek out new knowledge and experience.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationDid curiosity kill the cat? Evidence from subjective well-being in adolescents
Jovanović, V., & Brdarić, D. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.043 · Cited by 87
“The findings that curiosity has more robust associations with positive aspects of functioning than with the measures of emotional distress, and that positive well-being was more strongly associated with the stretching dimension of curiosity as opposed to the embracing are consistent with previous research (Kashdan et…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialCuriosity enhances the role of mindfulness in reducing defensive responses to existential threat
Kashdan, T. B., Afram, A., Brown, K. W., Birnbeck, M., & Drvoshanov, M. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.015 · Cited by 86
Self-citationHill, M. L., Nichter, B., Na, P. J., Norman, S. B., Morland, L. A., Krystal, J. H., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721002361 · Cited by 79
“Veterans have greater exposure to childhood adversity and combat trauma (Katon et al., 2015), which are known to sensitize individuals to the negative effects of later stressors (Bandoli et al., 2017; Nichter, Hill, Norman, Haller, & Pietrzak, 2020a; Smid et al., 2015).”
BackgroundWang, Y., & Wei-ning, Z. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3342055 · Cited by 75
Food for Hope: The Role of Personal Resources in Farmers’ Adoption of Green Technology
Bukchin‐Peles, S., & Kerret, D. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10051615 · Cited by 76
“Grateful and curious individuals experience more positive emotions [65,76].”
BackgroundHope into action: How clusters of hope relate to success‐oriented behavior in school
Dixson, D. D. (2019) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22299 · Cited by 72
Measuring Information Preferences
Ho, E., Hagmann, D., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3543 · Cited by 73
Stepping back to see the big picture: When obstacles elicit global processing.
Marguc, J., Förster, J., & Kleef, G. A. V. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025013 · Cited by 77
Epistemic Curiosity and Situational Interest: Distant Cousins or Identical Twins?
Schmidt, H. G., & Rotgans, J. I. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09539-9 · Cited by 71
Paradowski, M. B., & Jelińska, M. (2023) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2023.2192762 · Cited by 100
“Kashdan et al. (2009) propose that curiosity can be defined as the recognition, acceptance and pursuit of knowledge and new experiences, and identify its two components: the motivation to seek knowledge and new experiences ( stretching ) and the willingness to accept new and unpredictable…”
Weible, J., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1186853 · Cited by 71
“We conducted an exploratory factor analysis (Fabrigar, Wegener, MacCallum, & Strahan, 1999) in SPSS using maximum-likelihood estimation with Promax rotation; this procedure has been used to validate other attitudinal scales in psychology and education (e.g. Kashdan et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThomas, V. L., & Vinuales, G. (2017) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21029 · Cited by 68
Bosmans, G. (2016) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-016-0212-3 · Cited by 68
A Case for Domain-Specific Curiosity in Mathematics
Peterson, E. G., & Cohen, J. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09501-4 · Cited by 69
“Trait curiosity describes the habits of mind, affect, and behavior displayed by individuals considered to have generally curious personalities (Kashdan et al. 2009; Silvia 2008).”
BackgroundShin, E., & Lee, J. E. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.022 · Cited by 66
Smith, N. B., Mota, N. P., Tsai, J., Monteith, L. L., Harpaz‐Rotem, I., Southwick, S. M., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.069 · Cited by 66
Curiosity and time: from not knowing to almost knowing
Noordewier, M. K., & van Dijk, E. (2015) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2015.1122577 · Cited by 69
“In Experiment 3, we aimed to replicate Experiment 2 and for exploratory purposes, we tested potential effects of individual differences in curiosity, measured with the Curiosity Exploration Inventory (CEI-II; Kashdan et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAcademic engagement: A diary study on the mediating role of academic support
Tamayo, M. R., Blanco‐Donoso, L. M., Román, F. J., Carmona‐Cobo, I., Jiménez, B. M., & Garrosa, E. (2020) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101887 · Cited by 79
“, 2017), and depression and anxiety (Kashdan et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPawlak, M., Csizér, K., Kruk, M., & Zawodniak, J. (2022) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688221105775 · Cited by 75
“Using the Grit-O Scale (Duckworth et al., 2007), the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (Kashdan et al., 2009), positive L2 self-measures and L2 motivational measures, the researcher demonstrated that grittier students were more likely to passionately devote their time and energy to learning…”
Legault, L., Ray, K., Hudgins, A., Pelosi, M., & Shannon, W. (2017) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-016-9593-3 · Cited by 58
Religion Explained? : The Cognitive Science of Religion after Twenty-Five Years
Dubourg, E., & Baumard, N. (2017) · Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781350032491 · Cited by 59
Tuck, N.-J., Farrow, C. V., & Thomas, J. M. (2019) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqz080 · Cited by 55
Confused or curious? Openness/intellect predicts more positive interest-confusion relations.
Fayn, K., Silvia, P. J., Dejonckheere, E., Verdonck, S., & Kuppens, P. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000257 · Cited by 60
Self-citationHunt, C. A., Hoffman, M. A., Mohr, J. J., & Williams, A.-L. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01308-7 · Cited by 52
Does job stress affect innovative behaviors? Evidence from dubai five-star hotels
Bani‐Melhem, S., Abukhait, R., & Shamsudin, F. M. (2020) · Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism · doi:10.1080/15332845.2020.1737769 · Cited by 67
A Review of the Measures Designed to Assess DSM-5 Personality Disorders
Furnham, A. F., Milner, R., Akhtar, R., & Fruyt, F. D. (2014) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2014.514175 · Cited by 59
“The scales correlated with the HEXACO-60 (Ashton & Lee, 2009), measures of curiosity (Kashdan et al., 2009), sensation seeking (Hoyle, Stephenson, Palmgreen, Lorch, & Donohew, 2002) and hypomania (Eckblad & Chapman, 1986).”
MethodExpression of Curiosity in Social Robots
Ceha, J., Chhibber, N., Goh, J., McDonald, C., Oudeyer, P., Kulić, D., & Law, E. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300636 · Cited by 65
“Session 1—Post-Free Period After the free period, participants filled out the PERTS Growth Mindset Assessment [32] and the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI-II) [21], both measuring trait curiosity–the characteristic of always having an interest in learning or obtaining new information.”
MethodResearch on the effect of uncertain rewards on impulsive purchase intention of blind box products
Zhang, Y., Zhou, H., & Qin, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2022.946337 · Cited by 51
Kaczmarek, L. D., Kashdan, T. B., Kleiman, E. M., Bączkowski, B. M., Enko, J., Siebers, A., Szäefer, A., Król, M., & Baran, B. (2013) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.013 · Cited by 51
“The 10-item Curiosity and Exploration Inventory–II (CEI-II; Kashdan et al., 2009) included five items for stretching, assessing the degree to which people tend to seek out new knowledge and experiences (e.g., ‘Everywhere I go, I am out looking for new things or experiences’) and five for embracing, assessing the willi…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMENGUKUR RASA INGIN TAHU SISWA [MEASURING STUDENTS' CURIOSITY]
Raharja, S., Wibhawa, M. R., & Lukas, S. (2018) · Polyglot Jurnal Ilmiah · doi:10.19166/pji.v14i2.832 · Cited by 51
Na, P. J., Tsai, J., Hill, M. L., Nichter, B., Norman, S. B., Southwick, S. M., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.03.021 · Cited by 47
Reading interest in a digital age
Putro, N. H. P. S., & Lee, J. (2017) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702711.2017.1341966 · Cited by 59
“, 2004), (11) exploration (Kashdan et al., 2009), and (12) experiences of competence (Manfredo et al.”
BackgroundGouveia, R., Cruz, V. T., & Almeida, L. (2022) · BMJ Open Quality · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002044 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Kashdan, T. B., Gallagher, M. W., Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Breen, W. E., Terhar, D., & Steger, M. F.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- Colorado State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kashdan, Todd B.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 987-998
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2770180
- OpenAlex
- W2107615426
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 11.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH073937)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- trait curiosity, scale development, factor structure, construct validity, item response theory, psychological flexibility, positive affect, well-being, openness to experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review