CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,269Work-Family Balance ChallengesWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingEmployee Performance and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale

Carlson, Dawn S., Kacmar, K. Michele, Wayne, Julie Holliday, Grzywacz, Joseph G.·2006·Journal of Vocational Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 75 references

3 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Grzywacz, J. G. (2002). Toward a theory of work–family enrichment. Paper presentation, 34th Annual theory construction and research methodology workshop (November). Houston, TX
  2. Hammer, L. B. (2003). Work–family enrichment: An expansion of the work–family paradigm. In L. B. Hammer (Chair) Symposium. 18th Annual society for industrial and organizational psychology conference (April). Orlando, FL
  3. MacDermid, S. M., (2003). Discussant comments. In J. G. Grzywacz (Chair), Putting the family into work–family enrichment symposium. 65th Annual Conference of the National Council on Family Relations (November). Vancouver, BC
  4. Schwab, 1980, Construct validity in organizational behavior, Vol. 2, 3
  5. Wayne, J., Grzywacz, J., Carlson, & D., Kacmar, M. (2004, April). Work–family enrichment: A theoretical elaboration of the construct. In L. Eby (Chair), Coming of age: The new era of work–family research. Symposium conducted at the 19th annual meeting of the society of industrial/organizational psychology, Chicago, IL

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Carlson, Dawn S.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
131-164
ISSN
0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002
OpenAlex
W1986509704
Cited by
1,269
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 58
FWCI
69.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Vocational Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
work-family enrichment, work-family interface, scale development, work development, family development, factor structure invariance, convergent and discriminant validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review