Cited by 374Psychological and Educational Research StudiesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Measuring emotions during epistemic activities: the Epistemically-Related Emotion Scales

Pekrun, Reinhard, Vogl, Elisabeth, Muis, Krista R., Sinatra, Gale M.·2017·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

Measurement instruments assessing multiple emotions during epistemic activities are largely lacking. We describe the construction and validation of the Epistemically-Related Emotion Scales, which measure surprise, curiosity, enjoyment, confusion, anxiety, frustration, and boredom occurring during epistemic cognitive activities. The instrument was tested in a multinational study of emotions during learning from conflicting texts (N = 438 university students from the United States, Canada, and Germany). The findings document the reliability, internal validity, and external validity of the instrument. A seven-factor model best fit the data, suggesting that epistemically-related emotions should be conceptualised in terms of discrete emotion categories, and the scales showed metric invariance across the North American and German samples. Furthermore, emotion scores changed over time as a function of conflicting task information and related significantly to perceived task value and use of cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2016.1204989

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Predicting has repeatedly been shown to reliably induce both curiosity and surprise.

    “predicting has repeatedly been shown to reliably induce both curiosity and surprise, which can be classified as epistemic emotions (Pekrun et al., 2017).”

    From Predicting as a learning strategy (2021) · cites this paper as Pekrun et al., 2017

  • Control-value theory describes how academic emotions codetermine achievement behaviors.

    “Control-value theory (Pekrun, 2006;Pekrun et al., 2017) describes how such emotions codetermine what are termed achievement behaviors-behaviors that are conducive to the achievement of academic goals.”

    From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Pekrun et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pekrun, R., Vogl, E., Muis, K. R., & Sinatra, G. M.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Pekrun, Reinhard
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2016-07-22
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1268-1276
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2484079420
Cited by
373
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
23.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Munich (VII.1-H172.10)
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC 410-2011-0182)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
emotion measurement, surprise, curiosity, enjoyment, confusion, anxiety, frustration, boredom, metacognitive strategies, cognitive strategies, perceived task value, metric invariance, scale validation
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review