Cited by 74Education, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Mutual relationships between the levels of and changes in interest, self-efficacy, and perceived difficulty during task engagement

Open access
Nuutila, Katariina, Tapola, Anna, Tuominen, Heta, Molnár, Gyöngyvér, Niemivirta, Markku·2021·Learning and Individual Differences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

This study examined how students' interest, self-efficacy, and perceived difficulty change during a task, how those changes relate to each other, and how they predict performance. Sixth-graders (N = 1024) rated their interest, self-efficacy, and perceived difficulty repeatedly during a dynamic problem-solving task. Results from the estimated non-linear and piecewise latent growth curve models showed interest and self-efficacy to decrease, and perceived difficulty first to increase, and then to decrease, over time. The levels of and changes in interest and self-efficacy correlated positively with each other, but negatively with perceived difficulty. Task performance was positively predicted by initial interest and less negative change in self-efficacy, and negatively by initial perceived difficulty and steeper increase in it. The results suggest perceived difficulty to have a distinctive role in the dynamics of task-specific motivation, and on-task changes to be relatively independent of more general motivation and competence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102090

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mindful decentering intervention being perceived as easier may have impacted participants' feelings of self-efficacy regarding management of their anxiety or the extent to which they were able to engage in the intervention.

    “The mindful decentering intervention being perceived as easier may have impacted the participants' feelings of self-efficacy regarding the management of their anxiety or the extent to which participants were able to engage in the intervention (Bandura, 1988; Nuutila et al., 2021; Power et al., 2020).”

    From Mindfulness Effects on Anxiety: Disentangling the Role of Decentering and Treatment Expectations (2024) · cites this paper as Nuutila et al., 2021

    In “On-task changes in students’ motivation” (page unavailable), the paper reports that increases in perceived difficulty were associated with decreases in self-efficacy, and suggests that high difficulty might reduce effort and engagement. These findings concern students doing a task, not a mindful decentering intervention or participants’ confidence in managing anxiety; that application is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ainley, M., & Hidi, S. (2002). Dynamic measures for studying interest and learning. In R. P. Pintrich & L. M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: New directions in measures and methods (Vol. 12, pp. 43-76). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  2. Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146).
  3. Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The educational psychology series. Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89-115).
  4. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2020). Mplus user's guide (8th ed.).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuutila, K., Tapola, A., Tuominen, H., Molnár, G., & Niemivirta, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Szeged (HU)
Corresponding author
Nuutila, Katariina
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
92
Pages
102090
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3208893823
Cited by
74
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alfred Kordelinin Säätiö
  • Academy of Finland (#279742)
  • Suomen Kulttuurirahasto (190760)
  • Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA K135727, K135727)
  • Suomalainen Konkordia-liitto
  • Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap (OTKA K135727)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
interest, self-efficacy, perceived difficulty, task engagement, task performance, sixth grade students, dynamic problem solving, growth curve models, motivation dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review