Cited by 13Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesSurface Treatment and Coatings

Preparation of bio-inspired polydopamine coating on hydrated tricalcium silicate substrate to accelerate hydroxyapatite mineralization

Wu, Meng, Wang, Tao, Wang, Qian, Huang, Weixing·2019·Materials Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.036

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, M., Wang, T., Wang, Q., & Huang, W.
Affiliations
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Tao
Venue
Materials Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
236
Pages
120-123
ISSN
0167-577X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897800007
Cited by
13
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (kfjj20170619)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Surface Treatment and Coatings
Keywords
polydopamine coating, hydroxyapatite mineralization, amorphous calcium phosphate, dip coating, simulated body fluid, biomimetic materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review