Cited by 741Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlHealth Education and Validation

COMPASS 31: a refined and abbreviated composite autonomic symptom score

Open access
Sletten, David M., Suarez, Guillermo A., Low, Phillip A., Mandrekar, Jay, Singer, Wolfgang·2012·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Abstract

Objective To develop a concise and statistically robust instrument to assess autonomic symptoms that provides clinically relevant scores of autonomic symptom severity based on the well-established 169-item Autonomic Symptom Profile (ASP) and its validated 84-question scoring instrument, the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS).Patients and methods We assessed the internal consistency of COMPASS using Cronbach α coefficients based on the ASP of 405 healthy control subjects recruited and seen in the Mayo Clinic Autonomic Disorders Center between March 1, 1995, and March 31, 2010. Applying a simplified scoring algorithm, we then used exploratory factor analysis with orthogonal rotation and eigenvalue calculations to extract internally consistent domains and to reduce dimensionality. This analysis was followed by expert revisions to eliminate redundant content and to retain clinically important questions and final assessment of the new instrument.Results The new simplified scoring algorithm alone resulted in higher Cronbach α values in all domains. Factor analysis revealed 7 domains with a total of 54 questions retained. Expert revisions resulted in further reduction of questions and domains with a remaining total of 31 questions in 6 domains (COMPASS 31). Measures of internal consistency were much improved compared to those for COMPASS. Following appropriate weighting, this instrument provides an autonomic symptom score from 0 to 100.Conclusion COMPASS 31 is a refined, internally consistent, and markedly abbreviated quantitative measure of autonomic symptoms. It is based on the original ASP and COMPASS, applies a much simplified scoring algorithm, and is suitable for widespread use in autonomic research and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.10.013

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sletten, D. M., Suarez, G. A., Low, P. A., Mandrekar, J., & Singer, W.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Singer, Wolfgang
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
87
Issue
12
Pages
1196-1201
ISSN
0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054138854
Cited by
741
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 116 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ns032352-003)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS3 2352, P01NS044233, P50NS032352, NS-44233, N01 NS032352, U54NS065736, K23NS075141)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR24150, UL1RR024150)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
COMPASS-31, autonomic symptoms, autonomic dysfunction, symptom severity assessment, questionnaire reduction, internal consistency, factor analysis, scoring algorithm, autonomic disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Child, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Young Adult, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review