Cited by 12Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingBone health and osteoporosis research

Predictive equation for assessing appendicular lean soft tissue mass using bioelectric impedance analysis in older adults: Effect of body fat distribution

Open access
Toselli, S., Campa, F., Matias, C.N., de Alencar Silva, Bruna Spolador, dos Santos, Vanessa Ribeiro, Maietta Latessa, P., Gobbo, L.A.·2021·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

Background Low muscle mass is associated with sarcopenia and increased mortality. Muscle mass, especially that of the limbs, is commonly estimated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or bioimpedance analysis (BIA). However, BIA-based predictive equations for estimating lean appendicular soft tissue mass (ALST) do not take into account body fat distribution, an important factor influencing DXA and BIA measurements.Objectives To develop and cross-validate a BIA-based equation for estimating ALST with DXA as criterion, and to compare our new formula to three previously published models.Methods One-hundred eighty-four older adults (140 women and 44 men) (age 71.5 ± 7.3 years, body mass index 27.9 ± 5.3 kg/m 2) were recruited. Participants were randomly split into validation (n = 118) and cross-validation groups (n = 66). Bioelectrical resistance was obtained with a phase-sensitive 50 kHz BIA device.Results A BIA-based model was developed for appendicular lean soft tissue mass [ALST (kg) = 5.982 + (0.188 × S 2 / resistance) + (0.014 × waist circumference) + (0.046 × Wt) + (3.881 × sex) - (0.053 × age), where sex is 0 if female or 1 if male, Wt is weight (kg), and S is stature (cm) (R 2 = 0.86, SEE = 1.35 kg)]. Cross validation revealed r 2 of 0.91 and no mean bias. Two of three previously published models showed a trend to significantly overestimate ALST in our sample (p < 0.01).Conclusions The new equation can be considered valid, with no observed bias and trend, thus affording practical means to quantify ALST mass in older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111393

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toselli, S., Campa, F., Matias, C. N., de Alencar Silva, B. S., dos Santos, V. R., Maietta Latessa, P., & Gobbo, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Universidade Lusófona (PT)
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Corresponding author
Campa, F.
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
150
Pages
111393
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3161601511
Cited by
12
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance analysis, prediction equations, body fat distribution, waist circumference, older adults, muscle mass assessment, sarcopenia
MeSH terms
Aged, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Absorptiometry, Photon, Body Mass Index, Electric Impedance, Body Fat Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review