Cited by 75Child Development and Digital TechnologyPhysical Activity and HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Screen-based sedentary behaviour and psychosocial well-being in childhood: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations

Allen, Mark S., Vella, Stewart A.·2015·Mental Health and Physical Activity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mhpa.2015.10.002

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, M. S., & Vella, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Allen, Mark S.
Venue
Mental Health and Physical Activity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
9
Pages
41-47
ISSN
1755-2966 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150031507
Cited by
75
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
11.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mental health and physical activity (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
screen time, video gaming, television viewing, hyperactivity, conduct problems, peer problems, emotional symptoms, prosocial behavior, early childhood, late childhood, household income, parental education, non-communicable diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review