Cited by 287Attachment and Relationship DynamicsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumInfant Health and Development

State of the science of maternal–infant bonding: A principle-based concept analysis

Open access
Bicking Kinsey, Cara, Hupcey, Judith E.·2013·Midwifery

Abstract

Objective to provide a principle-based analysis of the concept of maternal-infant bonding.Design principle-based method of concept analysis for which the data set included 44 articles published in the last decade from Pubmed, CINAHL, and PyschINFO/PsychARTICLES.Setting literature inclusion criteria were English language, articles published in the last decade, peer-reviewed journal articles and commentary on published work, and human populations.Measurement and findings after a brief review of the history of maternal-infant bonding, a principle-based concept analysis was completed to examine the state of the science with regard to this concept. The concept was critically examined according to the clarity of definition (epistemological principle), applicability of the concept (pragmatic principle), consistency in use and meaning (linguistic principle), and differentiation of the concept from related concepts (logical principle). Analysis of the concept revealed: (1) Maternal-infant bonding describes maternal feelings and emotions towards her infant. Evidence that the concept encompasses behavioural or biological components was limited. (2) The concept is clearly operationalised in the affective domain. (3) Maternal-infant bonding is linguistically confused with attachment, although the boundaries between the concepts are clearly delineated.Key conclusion despite widespread use of the concept, maternal-infant bonding is at times superficially developed and subject to confusion with related concepts. Concept clarification is warranted. A theoretical definition of the concept of maternal-infant bonding was developed to aid in the clarification, but more research is necessary to further clarify and advance the concept.Implications for practice nurse midwives and other practitioners should use the theoretical definition of maternal-infant bonding as a preliminary guide to identification and understanding of the concept in clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.019

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results are consistent with attachment theory which suggests that the bond between caregiver and child strengthens over time.

    “Despite important conceptual and operational differences between maternal feelings of bonding and attachment representations (Bicking Kinsey and Hupcey 2013), results are consistent with attachment theory which suggests that the bond between caregiver and child strengthens over time (Bowlby 1969).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bicking Kinsey, C., & Hupcey, J. E.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
1314-1320
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045696407
Cited by
287
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (F31NR013303)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
maternal-infant bonding, conceptual analysis, conceptual clarification, attachment, affective domain, nursing theory, nurse-midwives
MeSH terms
Concept Formation, Female, Humans, Infant, Mother-Child Relations, Object Attachment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review