Cited by 57Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

An evaluation of mindfulness-based childbirth and parenting courses for pregnant women and prospective fathers/partners within the UK NHS (MBCP-4-NHS)

Warriner, Sian, Crane, Catherine, Dymond, Maret, Krusche, Adele·2018·Midwifery

Abstract

An evaluation of mindfulness-based childbirth and parenting courses for pregnant women and prospective fathers/partners within the UK NHS (MBCP-4-NHS).Objective To explore the usefulness within the National Health Service (NHS) of a brief (four week, ten hour) course based upon the Mindfulness Based Childbirth and Parenting (MBCP) programme (Duncan and Bardacke, 2010) described here as MBCP-4-NHS.Background The National Maternity Review (2016) and report of The Independent Mental Health Taskforce to the NHS (2016a, 2016b) in England highlight the need for significant investment into perinatal mental health services, with the Government pledging funding to improve such services through a range of measures. Whilst the field of mindfulness during the perinatal period is in need of well controlled trials and studies exploring the mechanisms of action (Hall et al., 2016) the limited research to date supports the potential for mindfulness based interventions in pregnancy and the need for further scientific study in this area (Dhillon et al., 2017; Shi and Macbeth, 2017). Particularly because it may broaden women's repertoire of coping strategies with the potential to improve the developmental trajectory of both parents and infants (Dunn et al., 2012; Duncan and Bardacke, 2010; Vieten and Astin, 2008). However, most of the studies to date have involved lengthy courses of around 8-9 weeks (24 h) duration, which may not be feasible or economical within a UK NHS setting and therefore, would be unlikely to be adopted as routine practice.Design An initial pilot study to discover if MBCP-4-NHS is acceptable and feasible within NHS maternity services, comparing maternal and paternal pre and post intervention self-report measures of mental health to begin to explore the effectiveness of this intervention.Setting NHS antenatal education classes held in children's centres for expectant parents across Oxfordshire.Participants All expectant parents receiving Oxfordshire maternity services between October 2014 and January 2015 were invited to self-refer into the intervention, of which 155 individuals (86 women and 69 men) took part.Intervention 'MBCP-4-NHS' - A brief (four week, ten hour) course developed from the nine week Mindfulness Based Childbirth and Parenting (MBCP) intervention.Measures Self-report measures of mental health including low mood/depression, mindfulness, stress, anxiety, pregnancy related distress and experiences.Findings The results showed a significant increase in both maternal and paternal mental health with women demonstrating a significant improvement in symptoms of stress, anxiety, depression, pregnancy-related distress, labour worry and positive and negative pregnancy experiences; and men improving significantly in symptoms of anxiety, depression and showing a trend for improvement in self-reported symptoms of perceived stress.Conclusions This is a promising antenatal intervention that can be feasibly implemented within NHS which might have the potential to impact upon parental mental health and, therefore, possibly also the health of next generation. However, caution is needed interpreting these findings given that this study did not include an active control group.Implications for practice This research provides a clear rationale and justification for a large randomised control trial of this intervention within the NHS, which should include a more diverse population, across multiple centres and should explore both the potential health benefits for parents and infants/children as well as potential economic costs/benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.004

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bränström, R., Duncan, L.G., (2014) Mindfulness and balanced happiness. In: Gruber J, Moskowitz JT (Eds.) The light and dark side of positive emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Krusche, A.; Dymond, M.; Murphy, S.E. & Crane, C. (2017). Mindfulness for pregnancy: An exploratory randomised controlled study of online mindfulness training during pregnancy. PhD thesis; The University of Oxford; ( in preparation for press )
  3. Larke, J. (2017). The impact of a mindfulness course on birthing experiences. MSc dissertation; Oxford Brookes University; ( in preparation for press ).
  4. McMillan, A.S., Barlow, J., Redshaw, M., (2009) Birth and Beyond: A Review of the Evidence about Antenatal Education. The Stationery Office, London
  5. Sedgfield, A.; Dymond, M.; Kucharska & Marczak, M. (2014). ''Getting Closer to Really Living'': Parents' experiences of mindfulness one year after attending the Mindfulness-Based Childbirth and Parenting (MBCP) programme. D.Clin.Psy. thesis; Universities of Coventry and Warwick; ( in preparation for press ).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warriner, S., Crane, C., Dymond, M., & Krusche, A.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Warriner, Sian
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
64
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803476295
Cited by
57
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
childbirth preparation, parenting courses, perinatal mental health, prenatal education, pregnant women, paternal mental health, maternal mental health, brief mindfulness intervention, NHS maternity services, intervention feasibility and acceptability, Oxfordshire, National Health Service
MeSH terms
Adult, Fathers, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, State Medicine, Parenting, Parturition, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women, Prenatal Education, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review