Cited by 105Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Mindfulness and perinatal mental health: A systematic review

Open access
Hall, Helen G., Beattie, Jill, Lau, Rosalind, East, Christine, Anne Biro, Mary·2016·Women and Birth

Abstract

Background Perinatal stress is associated with adverse maternal and infant outcomes. Mindfulness training may offer a safe and acceptable strategy to support perinatal mental health.Aim To critically appraise and synthesise the best available evidence regarding the effectiveness of mindfulness training during pregnancy to support perinatal mental health.Methods The search for relevant studies was conducted in six electronic databases and in the grey literature. Eligible studies were assessed for methodological quality according to standardised critical appraisal instruments. Data were extracted and recorded on a pre-designed form and then entered into Review Manager.Findings Nine studies were included in the data synthesis. It was not appropriate to combine the study results because of the variation in methodologies and the interventions tested. Statistically significant improvements were found in small studies of women undertaking mindfulness awareness training in one study for stress (mean difference (MD) -5.28, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -10.4 to -0.42, n=22), two for depression (for example MD -5.48, 95% CI -8.96 to -2.0, n=46) and four for anxiety (for example, MD -6.50, 95% CI -10.95 to -2.05, n=32). However the findings of this review are limited by significant methodological issues within the current research studies.Conclusion There is insufficient evidence from high quality research on which to base recommendations about the effectiveness of mindfulness to promote perinatal mental health. The limited positive findings support the design and conduct of adequately powered, longitudinal randomised controlled trials, with active controls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.08.006

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hall, H. G., Beattie, J., Lau, R., East, C., & Anne Biro, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Monash Medical Centre (AU)
Corresponding author
Hall, Helen G.
Venue
Women and Birth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
62-71
ISSN
1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1897667819
Cited by
105
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Women and Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
mindfulness training, perinatal mental health, perinatal stress, depression, anxiety, pregnancy, mindfulness-based interventions, maternal mental health, infant outcomes
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Pregnancy, Perinatal Care, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review