Cited by 418CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

The ClosTron: mutagenesis in Clostridium refined and streamlined

Heap, John T., Kuehne, Sarah A., Ehsaan, Muhammad, Cartman, Stephen T., Cooksley, Clare M., Scott, Jamie C., Minton, Nigel P.·2010·Journal of Microbiological Methods

Abstract

The recent development of the ClosTron Group II intron directed mutagenesis tool for Clostridium has advanced genetics in this genus, and here we present several significant improvements. We have shown how marker re-cycling can be used to construct strains with multiple mutations, demonstrated using FLP/FRT in Clostridium acetobutylicum; tested the capacity of the system for the delivery of transgenes to the chromosome of Clostridium sporogenes, which proved feasible for 1.0kbp transgenes in addition to a marker; and extended the host range of the system, constructing mutants in Clostridium beijerinckii and, for the first time, in a B1/NAP1/027 'epidemic' strain of Clostridium difficile. Automated intron design bioinformatics are now available free-of-charge at our website http://clostron.com; the out-sourced construction of re-targeted intron plasmids has become cost-effective as well as rapid; and the combination of constitutive intron expression with direct selection for intron insertions has made mutant isolation trivial. These developments mean mutants can now be constructed with very little time and effort for the researcher. Those who prefer to construct plasmids in-house are no longer reliant on a commercial kit, as a mixture of two new plasmids provides unlimited template for intron re-targeting by Splicing by Overlap Extension (SOE) PCR. The new ClosTron plasmids also offer blue-white screening and other options for identification of recombinant plasmids. The improved ClosTron system supersedes the prototype plasmid pMTL007 and the original method, and exploits the potential of Group II introns more fully.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.10.018

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ClosTron technique is reproducible and has been widely applied to various clostridia including acetogen C. autoethanogenum.

    “Thanks to these properties, this technique is reproducible and has been widely applied to various clostridia (Heap et al., 2007, 2010; Camiade et al., 2010) including acetogen C. autoethanogenum (Mock et al., 2015; Marcellin et al., 2016).”
  • The ClosTron technique was further optimized to generate multiple insertional mutations in the same strain by recycling of marker through the actions of FLP recombinase, and delivery of cargo sequence of up to 1 kb was successfully demonstrated in C. sporogenes.

    “This technique was further optimized to generate multiple insertional mutations in the same strain by recycling of marker through the actions of FLP recombinase, and the delivery of cargo sequence of up to 1 kb was successfully demonstrated in C. sporogenes (Heap et al., 2010).”
  • By incorporating a clostridial retro-transposition activating marker based on the ermB gene of the Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pAMβ1, positive selection for the desired integration can be made by the bacteria's acquisition of erythromycin resistance.

    “By incorporating a clostridial retro-transposition activating marker (RAM) based on the ermB gene of the Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pAMβ1, positive selection for the desired integration can be conveniently made by the bacteria's acquisition of erythromycin resistance (Heap et al., 2007, 2010; Kuehne and Minton, 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heap, J. T., Kuehne, S. A., Ehsaan, M., Cartman, S. T., Cooksley, C. M., Scott, J. C., & Minton, N. P.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Minton, Nigel P.
Venue
Journal of Microbiological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
49-55
ISSN
0167-7012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076243547
Cited by
418
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 35
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Microbiological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/D522289/1, BB/D522797/1, B/D522289/1, BB/G016224/1, BB/E021271/1, BB/F003390/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
Clostridium, FLP/FRT recombination, transgene delivery, Clostridium acetobutylicum, Clostridium sporogenes, Clostridium beijerinckii, Clostridium difficile, mutant isolation, blue-white screening, plasmid design
MeSH terms
Clostridium, Genetic Techniques, Introns, Plasmids, Mutagenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review