Cited by 663Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

The ClosTron: a universal gene knock-out system for the genus Clostridium

Heap, John T., Pennington, Oliver J., Cartman, Stephen T., Carter, Glen P., Minton, Nigel P.·2007·Journal of Microbiological Methods

Abstract

Progress in exploiting clostridial genome information has been severely impeded by a general lack of effective methods for the directed inactivation of specific genes. Those few mutants that have been generated have been almost exclusively derived by single crossover integration of a replication-deficient or defective plasmid by homologous recombination. The mutants created are therefore unstable. Here we have adapted a mutagenesis system based on the mobile group II intron from the ltrB gene of Lactococcus lactis (Ll.ltrB) to function in clostridial hosts. Integrants are readily selected on the basis of acquisition of resistance to erythromycin, and are generated from start to finish in as little as 10 to 14 days. Unlike single crossover plasmid integrants, the mutants are extremely stable. The system has been used to make 6 mutants of Clostridium acetobutylicum and 5 of Clostridium difficile, exceeding the number of published mutants ever generated in these species. Genes have also been inactivated for the first time in Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium sporogenes, suggesting the system will be universally applicable to the genus. The procedure is highly efficient and reproducible, and should revolutionize functional genomic studies in clostridia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.05.021

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heap, J. T., Pennington, O. J., Cartman, S. T., Carter, G. P., & Minton, N. P.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Minton, Nigel P.
Venue
Journal of Microbiological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
452-464
ISSN
0167-7012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099047627
Cited by
663
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 47
FWCI
15.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Microbiological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/D522289/1, BB/D522797/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Keywords
Clostridium, gene inactivation, Clostridium acetobutylicum, Clostridium difficile, Clostridium botulinum, Clostridium sporogenes, mutant stability, functional genomics
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Base Sequence, Clostridium, Conjugation, Genetic, Introns, Isopropyl Thiogalactoside, Plasmids, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombination, Genetic, RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, Lactococcus lactis, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Gene Deletion, Retroelements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review