Cited by 153DNA Repair MechanismsEffects of Radiation ExposureGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

A Role for the MRN Complex in ATR Activation via TOPBP1 Recruitment

Open access
Duursma, Anja M., Driscoll, Robert, Elias, Josh E., Cimprich, Karlene A.·2013·Molecular Cell

Abstract

The MRN (MRE11-RAD50-NBS1) complex has been implicated in many aspects of the DNA damage response. It has key roles in sensing and processing DNA double-strand breaks, as well as in activation of ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated). We reveal a function for MRN in ATR (ATM- and RAD3-related) activation by using defined ATR-activating DNA structures in Xenopus egg extracts. Strikingly, we demonstrate that MRN is required for recruitment of TOPBP1 to an ATR-activating structure that contains a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) junction and that this recruitment is necessary for phosphorylation of CHK1. We also show that the 911 (RAD9-RAD1-HUS1) complex is not required for TOPBP1 recruitment but is essential for TOPBP1 function. Thus, whereas MRN is required for TOPBP1 recruitment at an ssDNA-to-dsDNA junction, 911 is required for TOPBP1 "activation." These findings provide molecular insights into how ATR is activated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.006

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duursma, A. M., Driscoll, R., Elias, J. E., & Cimprich, K. A.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Cimprich, Karlene A.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
116-122
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993580403
Cited by
153
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 7
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES016486, R01ES016486)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
MRN complex, TopBP1, Chk1 phosphorylation, single-stranded DNA, DNA damage response, DNA double-strand breaks, ATM, Xenopus egg extracts
MeSH terms
Checkpoint Kinase 1, MRE11 Homologue Protein, Animals, Binding Sites, Carrier Proteins, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, DNA-Binding Proteins, DNA, Single-Stranded, Enzyme Activation, Humans, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Protein Kinases, Transfection, Xenopus laevis, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Cell Cycle Proteins, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Xenopus Proteins, RNA Interference, DNA Repair Enzymes, Cell Line, Tumor, Multiprotein Complexes, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review